Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Renault F1 Engine

I want to record the audio from this clip and use it as my alarm sound on my iPhone. Any idea how to do that?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2iBbwocYZw

Edit: I figured it out. Had to use Garageband to record the audio, then iTunes to create a ringtone out of it and then sync it to the iPhone. Boy iTunes sure doesn't make it easy to make a ringtone.
 
Last edited:
Give Massa a car that is not designed for Alonso's ridiculous drying style (understeering like a moron), and Massa will give him a run for his money.

Vettel should easily dominate Webber, and if not for some seriously bad luck, Vettel would have outscored Webber by a mile.

Hamilton, if given a consistent car that doesn't have its wheel fall off on the final lap of the Spanish GP, when he's comfortably in 2nd place and about to score a load of points, should win the WDC.

I hope that Failonso cries foul when Massa starts beating him.
 
Give Massa a car that is not designed for Alonso's ridiculous drying style (understeering like a moron), and Massa will give him a run for his money.

Vettel should easily dominate Webber, and if not for some seriously bad luck, Vettel would have outscored Webber by a mile.

Hamilton, if given a consistent car that doesn't have its wheel fall off on the final lap of the Spanish GP, when he's comfortably in 2nd place and about to score a load of points, should win the WDC.

I hope that Failonso cries foul when Massa starts beating him.

I think Hamilton has a chance - only thing is that McLaren haven't really produced a car that's good to go straight from the off since the recent era of regulations came into force. Red Bull have to be favourites for next year though - last year should have been a cakewalk for them with the car they had and their implementation of the revolution of the year [the blown diffuser], but they still managed to almost lose it.
 
I think Vettel is the clear favorite, but the new rules and tyres could change things quite a bit. We don't know how good the RB will be with KERS, whereas McLaren has proven that it can produce a winning KERS car (roughly 3/4 of the way into the season!).

Unlike 2010, I expect Alonso to be the driver under the most threat from his teammate, while Vettel should have an easier time against Webber. No offense to Webber, he's a good chap and all, just a bit outclassed.
 
Unlike 2010, I expect Alonso to be the driver under the most threat from his teammate, while Vettel should have an easier time against Webber. No offense to Webber, he's a good chap and all, just a bit outclassed.

I wonder what the end of this past season would have been like if Webber hadn't broken his shoulder. He was pressing and/or uncomfortable. If not for the injury he could have easily been world champion.
 
Give Massa a car that is not designed for Alonso's ridiculous drying style (understeering like a moron), and Massa will give him a run for his money.

It'll be interesting to see whether Maasa's struggles were entirely down to this seasons tyre characteristics, that even Ross Brawn has stated were somewhat unusual in their performance or whether he's still suffering from the physio/physiological side-effects of his accident last season, in the Richard Hammond Meets Stirling Moss programme earlier this year, they mentioned that Prof Sid Watkins thought that Moss should've waited 2 years after his crash before attempting a comeback, with the severity of the head injury that Massa suffered, maybe he returned too soon.

and if not for some seriously bad luck, Vettel would have outscored Webber by a mile.

Indeed, that's why I remain of the opinion that Vettel was the more deserving of the two, Webber was far too incident prone (and whinged far too much) despite receiving the more reliable equipment of the two.

I think Hamilton has a chance

Almost always, I think he's probably the absolute-fastest out there right now, if he can just cut out the clumsy errors, though to be fair all of the main WDC contenders had their fair share of howlers this season.

but they still managed to almost lose it.

AKA "Doing a Button" given how hard he made it for himself in 2009. :p

If not for the injury he could have easily been world champion.

Would've, could've, should've, if not for the countless mistakes he could also easily have been world champion, for what it's worth Webber himself has said that the shoulder injury was not an issue, hence why he didn't feel the need to tell his team.

I suppose one could question why he's felt the need to say anything at all then? Though I suppose if he'd said anything at the time, it would've been construed as being an excuse when he simply wasn't getting the job done whilst his teammate was.
 
I suppose one could question why he's felt the need to say anything at all then? Though I suppose if he'd said anything at the time, it would've been construed as being an excuse when he simply wasn't getting the job done whilst his teammate was.

especially since this talking about it afterwards and not telling the team about the injury at all ... i suspect that part of the story wont be forgotten and sure didn't help his position in the team for the next year


for red bull in general though it's remarkable that it's the only team AFAIK where the car designer is actually having a higher salery per year than the drivers... and Newey sure was worth every penny
 
AKA "Doing a Button" given how hard he made it for himself in 2009. :p

I think Brawn did a better job than Red Bull. Red Bull were only not pole in Canada, Singapore and Monza I believe, and were 1-2 for much of the season yet arguably only won because Ferrari made a tactical mistake. Brawn had the fastest car for the first 6 races, but didn't develop to the same extent nor have the cool weather pace to match the RBRs from Britain onwards
 
for red bull in general though it's remarkable that it's the only team AFAIK where the car designer is actually having a higher salery per year than the drivers... and Newey sure was worth every penny

And what a lot of pennies it is too. :eek:

I think Brawn did a better job than Red Bull.

But both made unnecessarily hard work of winning the Championship. Button especially so.

For those, like me, who are struggling to envisage what all the rule changes mean to the shape/appearance of the cars this might help.

Excellent link, short of the introduction of the moveable rear wing and the banning of the double-diffuser and F-Duct I didn't realise the changes were quite so extensive.

Not entirely convinced that the moveable rear wing, as is going to be implemented, is really the right way to go, can't help but think they'd be better off re-introducing ground effects and sorting out the aero/mechanical grip balance.
 
Excellent link, short of the introduction of the moveable rear wing and the banning of the double-diffuser and F-Duct I didn't realise the changes were quite so extensive.

Not entirely convinced that the moveable rear wing, as is going to be implemented, is really the right way to go, can't help but think they'd be better off re-introducing ground effects and sorting out the aero/mechanical grip balance.

I would have liked to see this season without the movable wing initially, if only because with the double diffuser (and therefore the blown diffuser) gone, the rear end changes from 2009 will actually been in effect, and the aerodynamic changes made for that year could actually have an effect. We'll see!:D
 
I would have liked to see this season without the movable wing initially, if only because with the double diffuser (and therefore the blown diffuser) gone, the rear end changes from 2009 will actually been in effect, and the aerodynamic changes made for that year could actually have an effect. We'll see!:D

I'm not against the moveable wing idea in itself, just the way it's going to be implemented, that the following car will be able to make use of it, whilst the car in front won't, nor will they be able to immediately use of it once the other car has passed, I can't help but think that the overtaking's going to be entirely artificial.

As Imola '05 & '06 showed, you don't actually need successful overtaking manoeuvres themselves to create exciting and tense racing. Just the ability for cars to race closely together.

can't help but think they'd be better off re-introducing ground effects and sorting out the aero/mechanical grip balance.

If only I'd waited another day, seems like they're addressing that for 2013.

BBC Sport said:
* Much smaller front and rear wings;

* A far greater proportion of the total downforce of the cars will be created by the underfloor, compared to the wings;

* A major reduction in the amount of total downforce created by the car;

* To achieve this, the underfloor of the cars will be shaped along its length to generate downforce for the first time since the 1982 season - currently cars have bottoms that are flat between the wheels;

* The average proportion of a lap that a driver is able to spend on full throttle to be cut from 70% in 2010 to 50% in 2013;

* Tyres will remain large and chunky to ensure cornering speeds remain high.

I do wonder what they mean by this? Especially if the cars are going to be slower anyway.
 
How will they manage that at Monza where they are on full throttle for 73% of the lap? :confused:

I know I'm being dim, it's one of those problems that I have trouble getting my head around, a bit like how do they build those tall cranes without the help of a tall crane? :confused:

In my, admittedly illogical mind, the slower the car, the longer you can spend on full throttle. Surely?
 
I know I'm being dim, it's one of those problems that I have trouble getting my head around, a bit like how do they build those tall cranes without the help of a tall crane? :confused:

In my, admittedly illogical mind, the slower the car, the longer you can spend on full throttle. Surely?

It depends why it's slow. If it goes into a massive oversteer and chucks you off the track every time you floor the pedal you would probably stay off it. If the car's handling is perfectly balanced you can probably use it to the max. :)

I can't remember which track it was but some of the in car footage last season showed the Red Bull's taking some of the really high speed corners flat while Hamilton and Alonso were having to lift slightly.
 
In my, admittedly illogical mind, the slower the car, the longer you can spend on full throttle. Surely?

How do they implement it anyway? can you use up all of your "full throttle" early in the race and then be laughably slow at the end? I'm confused.
 
Brundle and Coulthard to commentate in 2011. I have to say, I'm not that enamoured with this choice. I thought Coulthard was the most boring member of the team, and certainly didn't seem any more insightful than Brundle. I was hoping for one of the Radio 5 guys to get the gig, but we'll see.

I'm glad that Legard is gone, (it always came across as if he was constantly watching the timing screens and missing the race) though I would rather have David Croft instead of Coulthard, especially after the Leroy Jenkins mention.
 
Sky Deuschland announced they are showing all 20 races this year in HD.

This will be the first year Formula 1 is shot in high definition. Can a Speed TV announcement be far behind? I've been waiting to see F1 in HD on my 67" 1080p DLP for years. :)
 
I wonder if this means we'll get F1 in HD on BBC HD too?! :confused:
Formula 1 has stated that everyone who has a TV deal will be provided the HD feed. It should be a reasonably safe assumption that any broadcaster capable of HD will use it.
 
Yay that means it'll be on iPlayer in HD as well, on catchup and watch live hopefully.
 
What chances do you guys think does Mercedes GP have this season? Do you think they'll be able to fight for the championship?
My guess is yes. Brawn still is a genius and they had much time to prepare for the new year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.