Seems odd ... 475 posts almost 30,000 views and there's no consistency to peoples feedback even when doing what seems like similar tasks.
Started using my 11" i7/8GB/256GB about 3 hours ago on a full charge. Brightness at about 50%, running Chrome with 6 tabs open, Messages, Xcode and the iphone simulator. I've been using Xcode almost continuously, and an app running in the iPhone simulator the whole time. Battery is at 80% now and shows ~9 hours left, and the laptop is cool to the touch with no audible fans (not sure if they are even running). I do not regret getting the i7 at all, the battery life is amazing!![]()
Seems odd ... 475 posts almost 30,000 views and there's no consistency to peoples feedback even when doing what seems like similar tasks.
Started using my 11" i7/8GB/256GB about 3 hours ago on a full charge. Brightness at about 50%, running Chrome with 6 tabs open, Messages, Xcode and the iphone simulator. I've been using Xcode almost continuously, and an app running in the iPhone simulator the whole time. Battery is at 80% now and shows ~9 hours left, and the laptop is cool to the touch with no audible fans (not sure if they are even running). I do not regret getting the i7 at all, the battery life is amazing!![]()
The i7 doesn't run much faster by default than the i5, but it can turbo a higher clock speed than the Core i5.
If you're running a high CPU workload that never lets up in a continuous loop, the i7 is going to die quicker than the i5. Active power is greater at higher frequencies (assuming everything else remains the same) and with no chance to get to sleep the i7 will eat through the battery faster than the i5.
Where the i7 stands a chance however is in workloads where you aren't running the CPU at full tilt all of the time. The i7 needs tiny, tiny, tiny fractions of a second of idle time to throttle down and go to sleep. It's in these sleep states that it'll draw very little power and avoid being a major consumer of the battery. From the CPU's perspective, it wants to finish its work as quickly as possible so it can get back into its really low power idle states.
For workloads with balanced periods of load and idle time, the i7 should be able to at least equal the battery life of the i5. Short bursts of instructions can execute up to 25% faster on the i7, allowing it to go back to sleep that much quicker. Any energy expended from running at higher clock could be saved by spending more time at idle.
The other advantage is the larger cache. A larger cache means a higher likelihood of finding data in that cache, which saves trips to main memory. Anytime you go off-chip for data the power penalty is tremendous. You have to fire up a powerful memory interface, drive requests back and forth over a high speed bus and actually pull the data from DRAM. The entire process is far more power intensive than just grabbing data from the CPU's on-die cache.
Personally, I'll be going for the i7/8/256 varient of the MBA11". Battery life varies depending on how the CPU is used. Asking others how the battery life fares for them will not give any indication of what you will receive yourself. The i7, although using more power, should, in theory, finish the task quicker, and hence go back into its low power idle state quicker then the i5, thus saving power. The battery life for both models should, in theory, be more or less equal unless you throttle the i7 at its high clock speed for long periods of time.
Its actually VERY PATHETIC because this is a 11' discussion and not 13Is this normal?![]()
Probably not, but i have to admit i loved seeing this for the 5 mins it was there
View attachment 420748
Just wanted to share my experience with the difference in battery life on my base 11" when going from Mountain Lion to Mavericks.
I have until today been using Mountain Lion and have been getting between 7-9 hours of battery life with screen brightness on half and doing pretty basic stuff, like Safari open with 3 tabs, Mail, and Twitter.
Today I decided to try the Developer Preview for Mavericks as I have been hearing good things on the stability of it and so on. I got finished installing it a couple of hours ago and have been playing around with it since then (I love it).
The system seems to have settled and now I'm getting some pretty ridiculous battery estimates. With 94% battery left the estimation says 13:35 hours left! Insane. If it comes close to that I'm incredibly happy I upgraded.![]()
Its actually VERY PATHETIC because this is a 11' discussion and not 13
whats a couple of inches between friends?![]()
Thanks for sharing! I've been pretty excited to see how Mavericks affects battery life on these things. Just goes to show, efficient software is just as important as high-capacity batteries and power-sipping CPUs .![]()
whats a couple of inches between friends?![]()
Guys, i am at 60% after 6th recycle of battery and currently have 3 different browsers open (safari/chrome/mozilla) and excel, word documents and a netflix HD video ==> pretty normal usage if you are me...and the battery life remaining shows a pathetic 2 hours only....!
I know that it all depends on the usage but come-on 2 hours for gulping in 60% of battery with my current usage...this is![]()
![]()
beyond crap
Istat is also reporting same numbers![]()
No. Sort by CPU and post a screenshot.My story is pretty heart-breaking as this mac is crying at 4% battery now since i last reported at 60% and 4 hours remaining, overall i would say it barely managed to last till 5.5 hours only and thats a PATHETIC battery life ---> and i don't know what my options now should be ?
I am in the 14 day window but i need to see some other people like me 1st:
1. Who watched a 1 hour Netflix HD video (90% volume) and 60% brightness
2. Who had 3 different browsers (mozilla/safari/chrome): an average of 7 windows per browser open
3. Word and excel files open - editing and emailing
4. Skype (not talking just online) and Mac Mail running
5. Downloading and installing applications like: PDF converter, Divvy, etc
6. have Mint/Cleaner/Dropbox/Evernote always running in background
This is my typical normal usage and some may term it as a heavy user but guys i did NOT spend 1600+$ to send 1 email or surf 3-4 pages on the web at a time.
Please advise as i have to take some quick action pretty soon and as i am typing this battery is dying at 2% now
Is I-7 my best bet? Or is it a classified too much usage of this machine and i don't deserve a 8 hour minimum battery life with this usage?
I stat reported exhaust at 2100 once but i never heard a fan noise, it did become more than WARM when HD netflix was ON...after that became all cold and normal...so does it mean that we can forget about watching videos on this machine...huh ? No porn = epic fail lol..!
Thanks for helping out !
----------
& before anyone suggest me to look at activity monitor ..here are the numbers and my machine specs are : 11 inches/i5/8GB RAM/512 SSD
safari web content 955MB
Safari 340 MB
Mail 264 MB
MS WORD 264MB --> 3 word files
Firefox Plugin (Silver light --> the netflix) = 225MB
Firefox - 213MB
Finder 164MB
Excel 107MB (Shame on the machine --> it's just 1 excel file)
Skype 102MB
evernote 97mb
google chrome worker 92mb
dropbox 66mb
dock 56mb
systemuiserver 46mb
workflow service 43mb
mint 41mb
and more...irrelevant lesser mb things
total processes: 131