Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don‘t know how old the Air 1 is, but all the upgrades that the Air 2 got in terms of chassis, display etc were undone when they decided to use the whole Air 1 design for the current-gen iPads except for the processor and modem. So besides speed, it IS a very dated design.

It’s still not five years old. The design is not new, but it’s going to be peppy and a good experience in a way a 5 year old device wouldn’t be.
 
It’s still not five years old. The design is not new, but it’s going to be peppy and a good experience in a way a 5 year old device wouldn’t be.

The design wouldn't be new either if they used the Air 2 design. And I now looked it up, the iPad Air 1 launched in October 2013. Hmm!

I agree, it's not by definition a bad design, it's the least expensive design in terms of all components to provide a certain target group with a relatively fast tablet providing most of the typical iPad experience. But calling it up to date seems wrong because the only thing up to date is a processor which is 2 years behind and is, on top, reduced to the iPhone version (iPad processors were always pimped compared to their identical iPhone counterpart until the split of Pro and normal iPad).
Right now, the product fragmentations means that if you want a better chassis, you automatically have to buy into the Pro line, no matter if you need the extra RAM or CPU speed. That is something I would call upsell.
 
Will Apple release an iPhone Xi just for China?
Lol, this is hysterical!
[doublepost=1541283161][/doublepost]I have the 1st gen 12.9” iPad Pro with 4 GB RAM. It’s disappointing that 3 years later, most models will still have the same amount.

Interestingly, this is making me waffle between choosing a 2018 model with 256GB vs 1TB. The 512GB model seems like it would be an inefficient use of money.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: sracer
Interestingly, this is making me waffle between choosing a 2018 model with 256GB vs 1TB. The 512GB model seems like it would be an inefficient use of money.
i agree. In buying the 512GB one is overpaying for only the added storage, but at least with the 1TB model, one is overpaying for the storage but getting additional RAM as a bonus.
 
Just cancelled my 512GB iPad Pro 11 and get a 256GB instead.
No 6GB ram mean no future proof
I just did the exact same thing. Why would I spend $1500+ dollars and not be able to use it for many years to come? I figure this just replaces my existing IPP with full screen etc. This isnt a laptop replacement - no way, no how. It does look quite sick tho - still just an ipad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sracer and VMMan
While I agree that most pro users will want more storage and no doubt buy a higher capacity machine, I think there is a set of users that will find 64gb meets their needs. Some of them are the ones still quite happily using 5 or 6 year old iPads with the base storage configuration who simply want a newer faster model with a much better screen, for example.

The biggest storage hog, in my anecdotal experience, are photos. I know a number of people who max out their phones with their selfies, group shots, etc. For some reason, they want to store years worth of photos on their phones, thus driving the constant need for more storage. As phone cameras get more complex and produce higher resolution and larger file sizes the need for storage just grows as well.

In my case, I'll probably opt for the 256GB model to replace my Gen1 12.9" Pro. It follows my philosophy of doubling the storage with each succeeding computer; even if I have not maxed out the current storage. I however, do use my machine as a replacement for my Mac at times and thus store a lot of stuff on it I would not have if I didn't do that.



Oh yea, been there, got the t-shirt.

As for winning, he did say America would get tired of it; he just didn't say why.
Yeah, 256GB is the minimum storage I would purchase. That will be more than satisfactory. I move most photos off of my phone pretty quickly, because I don't want them all there taking up space and I like them backed up on my computer & external HDDs. It's also much easier when it is upgrade time! I always buy the middle-model. Whatever it is. Because 1) the base model on any Apple phone or tablet costs more than many higher end models on other platforms and you generally get less storage, and 2) for only $100-150 more (when talking a phone or tablet) you get something which is better than just 'adequate' and has decent storage. That used to be 128GB as the middle model. Now it's 256 -- which I don't mind at all. Though they have tacked on another $50 to the upgrade. Of course. :)) I do like to keep my tech for a while, though, so these are all still reasonable costs for me.
[doublepost=1541727911][/doublepost]
Something tells me the full Photoshop version for iPad is going to need the 1TB 6GB model and will have acceptable performance on the 4GB models. The demonstrator said no lag in UX during the keynote, however I noticed there was lag with the abrupt scrolling stop on the layers window, zoom-in/out. It’s possible that the version demoed is a beta version and I will revisit my thoughts on it when it is finally released.

Her hand was shaking during the demo not due to nervousness, rather that she was balancing the iPad in one hand while making adjustments with the Pencil.
Some of us as we get older...also have neurological conditions which cause faint trembling when exerting force with our hands. It's weird, for me it is only my hands where I have this problem. And of course it is only noticeable if I'm trying to hold my hands very still. I did have severe carpal tunnel a few years ago. Which cleared up with physical therapy and a brace I wore while sleeping. I'm not saying the demonstrator has a similar problem, just that it is possible.
[doublepost=1541728678][/doublepost]
Something tells me the full Photoshop version for iPad is going to need the 1TB 6GB model and will have acceptable performance on the 4GB models. The demonstrator said no lag in UX during the keynote, however I noticed there was lag with the abrupt scrolling stop on the layers window, zoom-in/out. It’s possible that the version demoed is a beta version and I will revisit my thoughts on it when it is finally released.

Her hand was shaking during the demo not due to nervousness, rather that she was balancing the iPad in one hand while making adjustments with the Pencil.

My other problem with iPads as part of my workflow is that transferring files to a traditional computer (an iMac, in my case) has always been a pain, slow, and tedious. For instance, there's generally no way to simply 'select all,' depending upon which app I'm using. While I would love to work on images on an iPad with a Pencil, as it does sound simple and intuitive, I would definitely wait to see how well Photoshop really works on the new iPad Pro. Another reason I can't move more workflow to an iPad is that there's no InDesign touch application. Which would be nice to have. Or at least I think it would be. One error Apple does often make is underestimating RAM needed in a device. Particularly when they've just made a major revision and therefore have new and higher costs. You'r probably right that 4GB will be fine in most instances. I also agree that complex and/or large files may need more than that. We will see. In the meantime...I have to plan as to just when I'll upgrade. My Gen1 12.9" is still very fast and meets all of my needs for a tablet which I don't use for most work, just some email when I'm not at my computer, web browsing, reading, and some video consumption. But, the new models are so beautiful...!
 
That's not okay. There are lots of reasons to want 6GB of RAM in one of these, very few reasons to need 1TB of storage.

Why do people always say this stuff?

I ran out of space on my 512GB iPad. People do different things, and a 5TB model could be fully used by someone.

I mean, solely based on NEED, we don’t need anything from Apple.

Besides the fleeting self-esteem boost that comes from taunting people that can’t afford them.

Let’s face it, it’s easier than earning that self-esteem through doing something special or having a respected talent.
[doublepost=1541973639][/doublepost]
To the people complaining: Do you do anything on your iPad that would warrant 6GB over 4GB? Personally it’s not an issue for me, but just really wondering about others.

Yes. While it’s interesting that you do not need it, I suppose, I’m not you and therefore almost certainly have different usage patterns.

The 8GB I have on my cellphone makes a monumental difference, and significantly cuts down on the need of the device to utilize main storage, which is orders of magnitude slower than RAM. It will also extend the life of the storage, although the battery will die long before the storage.

Remember, some of the RAM in these devices is shard with the graphics subsystem, so the initial 4GB of memory is not free, clear, and usable by the user. a 4GB device has about 3GB that’s usable by user programs, so a jump from 4GB to 6GB is really more like a jump from 3GB to 5GB, or a 66% increase.

I also notice a huge different between 8GB and 16GB in my MacBook as well.

6GB is signigficant, and you don’t really have to believe me, Apple engineers themselves clearly thought this was a benefit as well.
 
Why do people always say this stuff?

I ran out of space on my 512GB iPad. People do different things, and a 5TB model could be fully used by someone.

I mean, solely based on NEED, we don’t need anything from Apple.

Besides the fleeting self-esteem boost that comes from taunting people that can’t afford them.

Let’s face it, it’s easier than earning that self-esteem through doing something special or having a respected talent.
[doublepost=1541973639][/doublepost]

Yes. While it’s interesting that you do not need it, I suppose, I’m not you and therefore almost certainly have different usage patterns.

The 8GB I have on my cellphone makes a monumental difference, and significantly cuts down on the need of the device to utilize main storage, which is orders of magnitude slower than RAM. It will also extend the life of the storage, although the battery will die long before the storage.

Remember, some of the RAM in these devices is shard with the graphics subsystem, so the initial 4GB of memory is not free, clear, and usable by the user. a 4GB device has about 3GB that’s usable by user programs, so a jump from 4GB to 6GB is really more like a jump from 3GB to 5GB, or a 66% increase.

I also notice a huge different between 8GB and 16GB in my MacBook as well.

6GB is signigficant, and you don’t really have to believe me, Apple engineers themselves clearly thought this was a benefit as well.

To be honest with you, I have no idea whyyy I said that lmao. I wasn’t thinking clearly. I should’ve deleted it Lol.

I do wish I could have the extra RAM, but definitely don’t want to shell out money for a 1TB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
Here's my take on the 4 vs 6 debate:

The decision depends on how much memory you realistically expect to use. In my case, I have the original 128GB 12.9 Pro; and use about 2/3 of it. That means at least 256GB since 64 would definitely be a step back. To go to 6GB memory I need to spend $600 more. If the argument for 6GB is longer life, a fair comparison is what would a new iPad cost when the 4GB model is EOL'd. For argument's sake, let's assume the old one retains 1/4 of its value, so you'd get ~300 in trade from Apple. Let's also assume iPad prices stay relatively constant, which IIRC my original Pro retailed around $1000. So if a new one sells for say $1300, you'd pay a delta of $400 for a new model with higher specs than the 2018 model.

Complicating it is there is no reason to suspect Apple will not EOL all iPads at the same date.

Obviously, we each have our own needs and wants when it comes to what we buy. Personally, 256 is at the right price point for me. I am just presenting an alternative way to look at the situation beyond "6GB gives me a longer lifespan for my iPad..."
 
Should be 128GB standard (in end of 2018, previous gen was 64 already), then 256/512/1tb as an option. For 99$ extra for each step. All with 6 gb. But no, they are greedy. And don't bend it !
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
Woa, a logical level-headed comment. Odd to find here. Seriously, I agree.

Though, anecdotally, I remember the opposite too. I had a buddy in middle school circa 1998 from a wealthy family who build his gaming PC with 512MB of RAM using 8x64MB DIMMS - using a very expensive mobo with that many slots. He spent a small fortune on that PC. He assured everyone that he had so much RAM he wouldn't need more for a decade. Then RAM prices came crashing down a few years later and 1GB or 2GB was base spec.

I’d say 512MB of ram was a lot in 1998’ lol I remember my mom buying us a desktop in 2002 and it was $499 in Walmart as a gift, this desktop had 128MB of ram. It worked great for for about 2 years after that around 2004 I became an enthusiast..

Your friend was right! He overbuilt his system, and he didn’t need more ram for years.

I started building computers in 2004, 1-2GB of high performance CAS Latency 2 or 3 DDR 400Mhz was the performance standard for the enthusiast in the PC world. Well, if he had 512MB in 1998 he was doing pretty darn good.

Computers last a long time! In 2013 I was usually running 16GB of memory it was plenty! And the same is true 6 years later in 2019! 16GB is plenty! Even for a high end 4K gaming PC pushing 60fps. Unless your doing some serious stuff in Adobe premier pro CC, or similar applications.

Either way, I don’t see anyone’s ram amount as a power measurement in a computer. Ram can be increased anytime easily. It’s the cpu, gpu that counts the most to me anyways.
 
I’d say 512MB of ram was a lot in 1998’ lol I remember my mom buying us a desktop in 2002 and it was $499 in Walmart as a gift, this desktop had 128MB of ram. It worked great for for about 2 years after that around 2004 I became an enthusiast..

Your friend was right! He overbuilt his system, and he didn’t need more ram for years.

I started building computers in 2004, 1-2GB of high performance CAS Latency 2 or 3 DDR 400Mhz was the performance standard for the enthusiast in the PC world. Well, if he had 512MB in 1998 he was doing pretty darn good.

Computers last a long time! In 2013 I was usually running 16GB of memory it was plenty! And the same is true 6 years later in 2019! 16GB is plenty! Even for a high end 4K gaming PC pushing 60fps. Unless your doing some serious stuff in Adobe premier pro CC, or similar applications.

Either way, I don’t see anyone’s ram amount as a power measurement in a computer. Ram can be increased anytime easily. It’s the cpu, gpu that counts the most to me anyways.

Depends on what you use it for. If you do online trading a trading platform requires a lot of RAM for all the tickers,indexes,news,videos,etc..
If at the same time you have a bunch of Safari tabs open along with a few other apps then RAM will be important..
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Depends on what you use it for. If you do online trading a trading platform requires a lot of RAM for all the tickers,indexes,news,videos,etc..
If at the same time you have a bunch of Safari tabs open along with a few other apps then RAM will be important..

Right, so even 16GB is going to be plenty for that. 32GB is absolute overkill for anyone using a high end desktop but not that expensive to incorporate when building a PC either.

If you need more than 32GB of DDR4 memory, then you are running like several virtual machines and things like that.

High end performance DDR4 ram kits are usually,

16GB $150
32GB $300
64GB $600
128GB $1,200
 
Right, so even 16GB is going to be plenty for that. 32GB is absolute overkill for anyone using a high end desktop but not that expensive to incorporate when building a PC either.

If you need more than 32GB of DDR4 memory, then you are running like several virtual machines and things like that.

High end performance DDR4 ram kits are usually,

16GB $150
32GB $300
64GB $600
128GB $1,200

My MacBook Pro has 16GB of RAM which has been enough for me so far but iPhone 8 Plus and iPas Pro 10.5” could use more RAM to be honest
 
My MacBook Pro has 16GB of RAM which has been enough for me so far but iPhone 8 Plus and iPas Pro 10.5” could use more RAM to be honest


Yea that’s why I’m hoping the 1TB iPad Pro with 6GB that is on the way will be everything I expect it to be.

With my iPad Pro 11” that I sold, it only had 4GB of ram like most. If I minimized one game, and opened another game I could feel the micro stuttering, and see it. After a few seconds it would go away. But, that game wouldn’t be 100% smooth unless I closed the other game in the background. I could clearly see it was the memory running very thin or either depleted completely.

The above symptoms can be recreated with Ark Survival running on maximum settings, and GTA San Andreas running in the back ground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stylinexpat
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.