Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That was my experience, even after a week of usage. I've returned it for now (using my 2019, which is also not hot at all) and am waiting on an i3 MBA. I'll post a review in the user reviews thread to see how I go with that from a heat/battery life perspective, mostly for web browsing.
So what I read this far it might be quality control problem. And I read i3 and i5 is same temperature as well. I just feel stupid to return my 2019 macbook air by now the keyboard wasnt that different :(
[automerge]1587504780[/automerge]
And I changed the fan speed to go full blast 8000 rpm, it doesnt change the temperature at all, which is crazy
 
Last edited:
I agree with you. Don't get me wrong, when I saw Iris G7 graphics and a quad core i5, I immediately started thinking 'finally, a Macbook Air I can game on.' When I read up more about the machine, it looks like the games will have to be very old or graphically lightweight.

It sucks, but unless there's a breakthrough with Apple ARM notebooks in the future, passsively cooled Macs just aren't going to be useful as gaming machines. If even the modern MB Pros struggle, the Air doesn't really have much of a chance.

Trying to game on any Mac, let alone an air is like a three legged sack race.

You're stacking the odds of success against you severely due to the included hardware (even the GPU in a base model Mac Pro is pretty laughable from a gaming perspective), non-gaming focused OS, and form factor.

No matter what intel CPU comes out - no thin/light machine like an Air will ever be a good gaming machine because gaming focused machines will ALWAYS make trade-offs in terms of size/weight/power consumption for higher performance. Thin light hardware simply doesn't have the power or thermal headroom to game well. Whether its a DELL or a Mac or whatever.

As time moves on, the performance will continue to get higher on those machines, but the size won't change much because it will always be "as large as people will accept for portable gaming", which is already trying to fit desktop class performance into a portable.

So any thin and light will only ever be good for previous generation "e-sports" style games with low system requirements, because the high end games are a moving target.

Even my high end desktop machine will struggle with some modern titles with all the details turned on, and the video card and CPU in it were AMD's top tier gaming parts from only 2 years ago. And this machine has a CPU+GPU power budget of over 400 watts with cooling to match (I took out the second Vega 64 because multi-GPU sucks these days - spend more time tweaking settings to fix glitches than playing the game). There's simply no way you'll get anywhere close with a power/cooling budget of 12-20 watts. Or even 100 watts in a 16" MacBook Pro for that matter.

Thin/light will always be 5-10 years behind current AAA game performance.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RiaKoobcam
After 2 days of usage of i5/8/256.
Idle temp is around 50*C and no fan.
In regular usage - up to 70*C and up to 3000 rpm (no audible). Not reached 8000 rpm so far, max 5000 rpm on short period.

1587538571015.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpn and throAU
Trying to game on any Mac, let alone an air is like a three legged sack race.

You're stacking the odds of success against you severely due to the included hardware (even the GPU in a base model Mac Pro is pretty laughable from a gaming perspective), non-gaming focused OS, and form factor.

No matter what intel CPU comes out - no thin/light machine like an Air will ever be a good gaming machine because gaming focused machines will ALWAYS make trade-offs in terms of size/weight/power consumption for higher performance. Thin light hardware simply doesn't have the power or thermal headroom to game well. Whether its a DELL or a Mac or whatever.

As time moves on, the performance will continue to get higher on those machines, but the size won't change much because it will always be "as large as people will accept for portable gaming", which is already trying to fit desktop class performance into a portable.

So any thin and light will only ever be good for previous generation "e-sports" style games with low system requirements, because the high end games are a moving target.

Even my high end desktop machine will struggle with some modern titles with all the details turned on, and the video card and CPU in it were AMD's top tier gaming parts from only 2 years ago. And this machine has a CPU+GPU power budget of over 400 watts with cooling to match (I took out the second Vega 64 because multi-GPU sucks these days - spend more time tweaking settings to fix glitches than playing the game). There's simply no way you'll get anywhere close with a power/cooling budget of 12-20 watts. Or even 100 watts in a 16" MacBook Pro for that matter.

Thin/light will always be 5-10 years behind current AAA game performance.
Maybe in Mac world this is true, but there’s a few pc gaming laptops that I would consider thin/light like this One That should be able to play recent titles and not just e sports.
 
About 7-8 hours on whole day usage.

It seems the higher power 10W processor eats up more battery than the previous 2019 Air with the 7W processor. Well that makes sense.

Apple added a bigger batter to the 13" Pro when it moved from dual core to quad core.

The MBA was the king of battery life for all ultra portables. I'm not even sure if its the best battery life of all Mac notebooks now.
 
It seems the higher power 10W processor eats up more battery than the previous 2019 Air with the 7W processor. Well that makes sense.

Apple added a bigger batter to the 13" Pro when it moved from dual core to quad core.

The MBA was the king of battery life for all ultra portables. I'm not even sure if its the best battery life of all Mac notebooks now.

Yeah I just had a look at the specs and the battery specs - 4379mah on the 2019, 4379mah on the 2020. So if you get either of the quad core processors it's going to chew through it.

It'd be interesting to get battery life reports on the i3. Mine's arriving next week so I'll post if my battery life's any better when testing that - got 5-6 hours on the i5 in my week with it.
 
It seems the higher power 10W processor eats up more battery than the previous 2019 Air with the 7W processor. Well that makes sense.

Apple added a bigger batter to the 13" Pro when it moved from dual core to quad core.

The MBA was the king of battery life for all ultra portables. I'm not even sure if its the best battery life of all Mac notebooks now.
I think it used to be king of battery life mostly in the last gen before retina was added. That horrible TN screen sipped power.
 
I think it used to be king of battery life mostly in the last gen before retina was added. That horrible TN screen sipped power.
Yup. ... though with today's USBC charging I find "battery life" to be less important than when you had to find a 120V outlet. $34 gets you a 10000mah/38Wh USB-PD powerbank that'll substantially extend your usage time.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: magbarn
Yup. ... though with today's USBC charging I find "battery life" to be less important than when you had to find a 120V outlet. $34 gets you a 10000mah/38Wh USB-PD powerbank that'll substantially extend your usage time.
Yeah I used to do crazy stuff like buying MagSafe cables from broken adapters and soldering a connector so I can connect a 5 cell lipo To them so I can recharge without an outlet. 😂
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: deeddawg
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.