Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Of course no design changes as that would require some kind of innovation which Apple has not been able to do lately. In all fairness however, what more could they really do to the design to make it better? Make it smaller? Give it cool lights?
 
Apple just seems to be phoning it in, design-wise, when it comes to Mac mini updates, but I suspect there’s a pretty good reason behind it: drop-in rack/collocation server compatibility.
Agreed, but as asked before: what real company is using Mac Minis as servers in 2023? There's a whole NAS market for that now.
 
Given how small and functional it is — or even how likely it is to sit in a rack beneath a desk — it’s fine. It’s not an ugly device, and it’s hella practical. Besides, leaving it the same = discount. I’d rather upgrade for less and have the same design, working with the same desk accessories, than paying more for something I barely look at with a new “flashy” design.

It also seems to have the least fail rates, because they’ve been building that exact design for several generations now, just changing out the “guts” slightly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn and Tagbert
Tim leaked this info to make sure there's no fence sitters holding out for an M3 mini
 
I'd genuinely be keen to see how a spec'd up M2 Mac mini measures up in the real world against the base Mac Studio because the UK price difference is something like £150 for additional monitor support and a load of extra ports.
 
I'd genuinely be keen to see how a spec'd up M2 Mac mini measures up in the real world against the base Mac Studio because the UK price difference is something like £150 for additional monitor support and a load of extra ports.
A spec'd up mini has the same ports
 
I think this machine is pretty perfect as is right now; clean and elegant as is typical of Apple products.

For those of you that want an appearance change, there's skins available that'll give it that extra pizazz you may be looking for.

But I think that at least for the foreseeable future, this is a mature product.

It won't (and doesn't need to) change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn and Tagbert
I seriously doubt we'll see a new Mini in 2024 when they were just updated today and are on a 2 year update cycle. Maybe in 2025.
I tend to agree, but a December 2024 update would be almost two years from the current January 2023 update, so it's not impossible.
 
While I do think that configuration should probably be cheaper than it is, I personally have a base M1 Air and it never fails me at anything. It works just as well as my 14” MBP for a lot of tasks. A lot of people will be perfectly happy with 8GB and 256GB.
My 89-year-old dad is one of them. He surfs the web, watches YouTube videos, answers email, and listens to music. He's been using Mac minis for years. The last version of macOS on his 2012 i5 Mac mini stopped getting security updates, so I gave him my 2015 MBP as a replacement. He uses it in clamshell mode with his external keyboard, monitor, and mouse. If he didn't have my MBP, the base-model 2023 Mac mini would be perfect for him.
 
I don't think the Mac Mini will ever change its design at this point, not until it becomes an entirely new product. The current design is the most functional.
Also, the design variant is the Mac Studio which is already on the market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Just realised, Apple has moved past making products thinner now. With exception to the M1 iMac, they seem determined not to repeat the mistakes of 2013-2020 by making enclosures too thin and thermal throttle. As has been discovered, the M2 Pro Mini weighs more than the M2 base, probably because there's another fan inside. This indicates that they don't want to sacrifice the space in future, in case more cooling/larger chips are needed some day (i.e. M3/M4).
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwdsail
Just realised, Apple has moved past making products thinner now. With exception to the M1 iMac, they seem determined not to repeat the mistakes of 2013-2020 by making enclosures too thin and thermal throttle. As has been discovered, the M2 Pro Mini weighs more than the M2 base, probably because there's another fan inside. This indicates that they don't want to sacrifice the space in future, in case more cooling/larger chips are needed some day (i.e. M3/M4).

I want to believe....
 
Sorry for getting off the design topic here, but . . .

I currently have a late 2015 5k iMac w/24gb and 2tb Fusion drive (almost 1tb full - I have a lot of music and will add more). Here are the replacement options since I'm giving up on seeing another 27" iMac:

M2 Mini with 16gb and 2tb = $1419
M2 Pro with 16gb and 2tb = $1739
Studio Display refurbished = $1359

I'm a teacher, I don't do any graphics, photo editing, etc. The only reason for considering the M2 Pro is to make it more future proof. My current iMac actually still does everything I need it for, but the fan is starting to rev up a lot more, spinning beachball a little more often and it can't be upgraded to Ventura.

I've thought about getting the Mini with 1tb and adding a Satechi hub with SSD enclosure, but these are $100 and then adding a 1tb SSD is another $75, which is half the $360 Apple charges but it's one more thing and the ports on the Satechi can't be used for charging.

So, is the M2 Pro worth the extra $320 considering I'll have it for 5+ years?

Appreciate any input.
Yes, definitely. You’ll get a much longer life out of your Mini…
 
The Mini with the M2 Pro SOC has 4 fully independent thunderbolt 4 ports. What else are you looking for?
More ports, like I said. We use them as mobile media management stations. The more card readers we can connect, the faster we can relax.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.