Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
AVP is an incredible bit of kit, but the market for it just isn’t there (IMHO).

I tried it in the store and loved it, but my first and last thoughts were “If I still lived alone this would be amazing” - nobody wants to sit around the house in this thing with lots of other people around, let alone on a train, plane, bus etc.
I haven’t been on a train or a bus, but I use it all the time whenever flying. I have a travel router, a power bank and a 2 TB SSD drive filled with movies strapped together in my backpack, connect Vision Pro to it and watch a movie or two to pass time. Best entertainment device ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
I haven’t been on a train or a bus, but I use it all the time whenever flying. I have a travel router, a power bank and a 2 TB SSD drive filled with movies strapped together in my backpack, connect Vision Pro to it and watch a movie or two to pass time. Best entertainment device ever.
I do totally get the use cases. I’d love one for certain situations but (for me) a device at this price point just isn’t worth the limited use cases that I’d feel comfortable using it in.
 
I live alone and love it. but even if I lived with others it would be a great way to escape them when I needed to. Also if other people were sleeping and ya wanted to watch a movie at full size with surround sound this is the only way unless ya have a soundproof home theater in your home.
As a father of two who loved our quiet house before the kids arrived I hear you. 😂
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Rychiar
Uhhh you do realize the smart glasses will be running vision os, soooooooooo why wouldn't you develop for the AVP knowing full well it is heading to a mass market product? I feel like you kind of defeated your own point or fail to look more then 3 feet in front of you.
The smart glasses won't be running VisionOS. Nothing developed for the Vision Pro will carry over to the smart glasses. You'd be better off developing apps for the Apple Watch in preparation for the smart glasses launch.
 
The smart glasses won't be running VisionOS. Nothing developed for the Vision Pro will carry over to the smart glasses. You'd be better off developing apps for the Apple Watch in preparation for the smart glasses launch.
Based on what? META even copied the UI for their new glasses. Apple has routinely said and been rumored to be using vision OS in glasses
 
I haven’t been on a train or a bus, but I use it all the time whenever flying. I have a travel router, a power bank and a 2 TB SSD drive filled with movies strapped together in my backpack, connect Vision Pro to it and watch a movie or two to pass time. Best entertainment device ever.
Wait you can use it with external SSD, how?
 
Wait you can use it with external SSD, how?
I did a search on “travel router” which led me to devices like this one. I know nothing about this company and am not trying to promote it, but I think it answers your question.

 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Based on what? META even copied the UI for their new glasses. Apple has routinely said and been rumored to be using vision OS in glasses
How has Meta copied the VisionOS UI for the Meta Ray-Ban Display? All the screenshots I've seen look more like what I'd see on a smartwatch.

Displays on smart glasses aren't big enough to support a spatial interface, and their hardware isn't powerful enough to run VisionOS-class apps. It won't have enough sensors to run a spatial interface.

The reason the Vision Pro is as big and heavy as it is is because it needs that to run VisionOS at acceptable performance and usability. (I mean, I'm sure it could be cut back some, but not enough to fit in moderately normal looking glasses)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Varmann and Kr0019
It’s still way more powerful and better than the new Samsung VR I think that’s why Apple randomly updated it
 
Wait you can use it with external SSD, how?
Most routers have USB port where you can connect a hard drive or SSD to use as network storage device. You just have to enable DLNA in the router settings.
I did a search on “travel router” which led me to devices like this one. I know nothing about this company and am not trying to promote it, but I think it answers your question.

Yes, it’s a great company and makes great routers. I have their MT-3000 travel router.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
As a father of two who loved our quiet house before the kids arrived I hear you. 😂
I do totally get the use cases. I’d love one for certain situations but (for me) a device at this price point just isn’t worth the limited use cases that I’d feel comfortable using it in.
I agree with you that it’s not for everyone at this price point.

I have four Rugrats at home. It is great that while they are watching TV or more like taken over my TV, I can put on my Vision Pro to surf the net or watch TV or do other things while at the same time watching them.
 
Because we are on the 2nd gen AVP now and it's going to be discontinued to make smart glasses anyhow.
You know the difference between hardware and software right? It won’t matter if the hardware is an AVP or smart glasses, both will need the same app development. So tell us how developing for different hardware will make it DOA? I’m trying to understand your simple thinking here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: richinaus
it's the only apple product I find exciting anymore 🤷‍♂️
Same. I’ve said this before, but a lot of other things that were once exciting peaked. Smartphones stopped being exciting years ago and now we have such marginal improvements the everyday person can’t tell the difference. Same with smart watches and iPads.

The Apple vision? We are at the very beginning of a new computing platform that’s straight out of a sci-fi movie. People don’t like to wait for progress to happen. They see the first version and are like “ew it’s heavy and expensive and blah blah blah” not even realizing that this is just how the progression of technology works. At some point it’s going to be half the size and half the price. We are all early adopters. This is like brick phones before the first iPhone. Innovative. Amazing. But very first gen and early to the game
 
You know the difference between hardware and software right? It won’t matter if the hardware is an AVP or smart glasses, both will need the same app development. So tell us how developing for different hardware will make it DOA? I’m trying to understand your simple thinking here.
Which 3rd-party VisionOS apps do you imagine running on the iGlasses?
 
okay which one of you little freakers is actually buying this? I've been told people actually buy/use these but never seen one irl.... who are you!?!?!
I have never seen one in the wild. I have never even touched one. I know absolutely no one who owns one. Pretty crazy when you think about it considering it’s an apple product and the ‘future of computing’
 
The smart glasses won't be running VisionOS. Nothing developed for the Vision Pro will carry over to the smart glasses. You'd be better off developing apps for the Apple Watch in preparation for the smart glasses launch.
Why not? Its the same technology using less power.
 
And you know this how?
Because there are almost no apps specially designed for it. Just iPad apps.

The idea of strapping a 3500 dollar iPad to your face to check Carrot Weather is beyond ridiculous.

This thing might be great for niche markets though.
 
I live alone and love it. but even if I lived with others it would be a great way to escape them when I needed to. Also if other people were sleeping and ya wanted to watch a movie at full size with surround sound this is the only way unless ya have a soundproof home theater in your home.
I don’t know why people keep talking like Apple Vision Pro is intended to isolate you from the world. One of the fundamental design principles, as emphasized in the keynote, is that you can see others and they can see you. Yes, it’s still early days and implementation is crude - it’s a bulky device and the EyeSight feature is a bit low res - but the core idea of the AVP is to NOT to isolate, unlike the headsets that came before it. AVP killed the metaverse idea. Yet people continue to mislabel it a VR device because it has an environments feature where you can go into immersion when needed. But the default is that you can see your environment and people can see you eyes - that’s the whole point. The size and weight and realism of seeing your face will increase over time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vantelimus
Overall the new Vision Pro looks like a nice improvement over the previous gen. Would like to see the current version in more countries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
okay which one of you little freakers is actually buying this? I've been told people actually buy/use these but never seen one irl.... who are you!?!?!
Owners , at least the non-dorky ones, don't usually walk in the street wearing VR headsets . They're used at home or inside architects/industrial designers offices ( in the case of the VP).
 
  • Like
Reactions: dmi and Rychiar
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.