pachyderm
macrumors G5
Yeah. They're never going to say no to money.Too much money for Liberty Media and the FIA to cut back!
God I hate them.
Yeah. They're never going to say no to money.Too much money for Liberty Media and the FIA to cut back!
Haven’t watched the race, just saw the results, I said reliability would be a factor this season…. But I am finding this whole 50% battery 50% engine idea utterly stupid anyway. Only reason they’ve done it is to appease the climate change fanatics, if F1 wanted to do that properly they should stop flying the parade all around the globe every year as I expect that produces FAR more CO2’s then any race does.
Blah bring back the V10’
I just hope this year is not a repeat of the Hamilton / Rosberg era where it was simply a question of who was finishing first and who’d be second. Those were boring seasons.
But I am finding this whole 50% battery 50% engine idea utterly stupid anyway. Only reason they’ve done it is to appease the climate change fanatics...Blah bring back the V10’s..
So having watched the VOD of the Chinese Grand Prix this morning, my thoughts:
- Four DNS, including both McLarens. Three of the four had Mercedes PUs, so are they strong, but fragile?
Good luck with that. The Mercedes is on a completely different level than any other package at this point in the season.
Incredible to see McLaren not start the race. Never thought I’d see that.
Time for balance of performance tweaks? 😉
So having watched the VOD of the Chinese Grand Prix this morning, my thoughts:
- Four DNS, including both McLarens. Three of the four had Mercedes PUs, so are they strong, but fragile?
- I’ll take “Yo-Yo Passing” over “DRS Trains” any Sunday.
- Toto was throwing shade when he claimed the higher-compression ratio of the Mercedes ICE was “a handful of HP”. The speculation it is good for an extra 20-30HP is probably conservative considering how they just romped past both Ferrari’s on the back straight.
- While I was pulling my hair out at Charles and Lewis racing each other instead of Kimi and George, the fact is that at this point they are racing for third place so as long as they do not take each other out or let someone else past them into third, let em race and have fun.
Maybe McLaren tried to use some Mercedes Mapping Settings and got nerfed by Mercedes? Covert Operations? Some OTA intervention……. 😉
wow!
What happened to JPM? Is he not part of the regular team?
Also, this commentator crew is pretty horrible.
Good luck with that. The Mercedes is on a completely different level than any other package at this point in the season. The other PU OEMs now have to wait until Barcelona before they can bring upgrades (technically Monaco, but I don't expect anyone to do so).
They did it to attract Audi and Audi is adamant they do not want to go back to naturally-aspirated engines - especially engines like V10s that have zero relevance to their commercial vehicles.
The race was kind of entertaining with Ferrari giving us the most action, with honourable mentions to Bearman, Ocon, and Gasly. Great to see Kimi (Antonelli, not Raikkonen Mr Announcer) win his first Grand Prix. Loved him telling Lewis he was just one years old when Lewis won the Canadian GP back in 2007, ouch lol.
Lots of fans unhappy with the performance gaps and many won't remember the late 80's and early 90's when some teams were as much as 3 seconds a lap quicker. I got called a 'new fan' yesterday for that observation despite obviously being on that forum since 1998, and by a guy who had joined in 2022 lol. I do hope the gaps close and we get more than two teams capable of wins, but with such a lame set of regulations, we knew Mercedes were rumoured to be unbeatable going into this season. Many also don't seem to understand that F1 has close ties with the automotive sector and is used as an R&D category developing technologies that are eventually used in road cars. The regs suit the likes of Honda, Ford, Mercedes, and even Ferrari to a point. Without this relationship, most of the major players would be absent, although Honda, Renault and Ford come and go at the drop of a hat.
I think Lewis would have been 10 seconds adrift, rather than 25 seconds had he not battled with Charles. At least it spiced up what could have been an extremely dull race. Increasing the split would hopefully reduce the amount of lift and coast drivers are having to do and bring it a bit closer to the old 80/20 split in the old regs. We may see reliability of the PU's coming into the mix if they are suddenly expected to operate at a 10% increase. I think Max will be even more frustrated seeing as the Ford PU is rumoured to be rather fragile.The reason the people at the back end were so far behind was because of Ferrari, the more they squabbled the further down the track Kimi went and the further behind everyone else became, if they didn't do that and instead concentrated on getting to the front and taking positions then the gap wouldn't have been so big.
FYI folks they is SOME talk amongst the FIA of potentially changing the balance of the cars to a 60/40 split with 40 being the battery power, so they nay be realising the mistake they've made.....
I think Lewis would have been 10 seconds adrift, rather than 25 seconds had he not battled with Charles. At least it spiced up what could have been an extremely dull race. Increasing the split would hopefully reduce the amount of lift and coast drivers are having to do and bring it a bit closer to the old 80/20 split in the old regs. We may see reliability of the PU's coming into the mix if they are suddenly expected to operate at a 10% increase. I think Max will be even more frustrated seeing as the Ford PU is rumoured to be rather fragile.
We may see reliability of the PU's coming into the mix if they are suddenly expected to operate at a 10% increase.