Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
All teams should run their own power, customer run a 2nd tier championship...
F1 should be about you race what you develop, buying PU from a competitor should be banned.. It is cheating.. It is making F1 into a F2+ championship, we have so many shared parts now.. Why not just have a 1 PU for all cars? Right we have that in F2 to F99...

NO customer engines from 2027.. But no we cannot have nice things...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Paul1964
All teams should run their own power, customer run a 2nd tier championship...
F1 should be about you race what you develop, buying PU from a competitor should be banned.. It is cheating.. It is making F1 into a F2+ championship, we have so many shared parts now.. Why not just have a 1 PU for all cars? Right we have that in F2 to F99...

NO customer engines from 2027.. But no we cannot have nice things...
So you would have disallowed ALL the wins posted by the single winningest engine in F1 history? I refer to the mighty Cosworth DFV. Neither Cosworth, nor the block supplier Ford ever entered the CC. Genius,
sheer genius. Have any more ill considered notions?
 
Toto has paid visits to Lawrence Stroll at Barcelona and Zandvort and now rumors are starting up that Aston Martin may return to Mercedes PUs in 2028 if Honda is unable to close the gap through 2027.


Don’t rule out RBPT yet for the AMR28.
I don’t see Honda being able to recover. They simply no longer have skin in the game. Very hard to watch. At least for me.
 
All teams should run their own power, customer run a 2nd tier championship...
F1 should be about you race what you develop, buying PU from a competitor should be banned.. It is cheating.. It is making F1 into a F2+ championship, we have so many shared parts now.. Why not just have a 1 PU for all cars? Right we have that in F2 to F99...

NO customer engines from 2027.. But no we cannot have nice things...
F1 exists to promote and test the latest motoring innovations. We suckers just watch and pay for it.
 
F1 should be 100% you develop, you race, if not then what is the point? F1 is heading rapidly towards being a F2+ formula.. If you cannot build an engine, then fire the team that you hired and try again..

Change the regs to ensure that that engines can be built, so that you have 10-12 teams, with 2 cars per, and 24/36 engines per season per team...

Buying in engines is a short cut, a cheat code.. And you expect full points for taking a lazy way to a win???

What was done in the past is irrelevant, F1 should never have allowed customer engines, all in house engineering, if you cannot in house an engine, you have no business being in F1..

F1 is testing nothing now relevant to motoring, that was maybe when Liz was a child.. when we thought straw bales was the greatest in hi tech safety..
 
Speaking of the F1 driver market, The Race had an article on the "death" of the driver market and what "killed" it.

With Leclerc, Norris and Verstappen now signed through (at least) 2030, this likely locks out Ferrari, McLaren, Mercedes and Red Bull through the end of the decade when you consider it is likely that Hamilton, Piastri, Antonelli, Russell and Hadjar have safe seats through that period, as well.

This should be an area of concern not just with the top teams, but also the mid-field, as it means the number of seats available each year for rookies is shrinking and shrinking dramatically. For 2027, only two of 24 seats are believed to be "available" - Esteban Ocon's at Haas and Liam Lawson's at Racing Bulls. And Lawson may yet eke out another year considering how he has been performing and Yuki Tsunoda continues to be discussed for Ocon's seat.

But even if both Ocon and Lawson are released and Haas and Racing Bulls promote rookies rather than sign former F1 drivers, there are a lot of rookies looking to move up. If Tsolov wins the F2 Championship this year, he will join last year's champion Leonardo Fornaroli looking for a seat. Fornaroli is currently McLaren's reserve driver, but Norris is now signed through 2030 and Piastri is likely doing enough to keep his seat, at least for 2027. Rafael Câmara has won the F3 championship and will be able to compete in F2 for a second year in 2027 if he cannot land Ocon's seat at Haas. But if Nikola Tsolov wins the 2026 F2 championship, he will have to move on. As a Red Bull Junior, replacing Lawson at Racing Bulls would be best for him (if not Liam), but if Lawson is retained for 2027, he could then be promoted to a reserve and test driver position at either Red Bull or Racing Bulls (especially if Yuki either goes to Haas or is released, though Racing Bulls could also release Ayumu Iwasa). So you have two (potential) F2 champions and an F3 champion who could end up "warming the bench" at three F1 teams because there are no open seats at any of them.

Since the 1990s, driver turnover in F1 has been on a steady decline as driver contracts in general have grown longer. And with the top four teams (Ferrari, Mercedes, Red Bull and McLaren) this trend is even more pronounced. Verstappen and Norris will likely drive their entire careers at Red Bull* and McLaren and Leclerc effectively will be a lifer at Ferrari since he has driven for them since his second year in the sport and his current contract takes him into the 2030s.

The Race points to the current cost cap as a major reason for this. Before the cap, the top teams spent upwards of a half-billion a year. With the cap more than halving that, they now have hundreds of millions of "free" money available and with driver salaries not part of the cap, that money can be diverted to hiring - and retaining - top talent.

That cost cap also prevents the midfield from improving their positions. Look at Aston Martin and Williams - they are both spending right up to the cap on new facilities, but they are still playing catch-up to teams like Mercedes and Ferrari who were able to fully kit out their factory and development infrastructure before the cap. Even Red Bull is having to wait years for their new wind tunnel to come online - partly because of the complexity of building one, but partly because they are super expensive and the team needs to spread out the spend over years to stay within the cap.



* - Yes, Max started with Toro Rosso, but they are part of the Red Bull family.
 
Regardless of anything, having a fixed or floating budget, we will still have 12 v 12 drivers max in F1, in effect 10 to 12 teams, competing with and against themselves...

You will never get Merc/RB/Mclaren to allow 50/50 equal, share and share alike.. One driver will be 100% and the other 0%, Max will never accept the 2nd seat gets more than 0% support, Pies knows he is a salaryman, a driver there to warm the seat, meat in the seat to meet regulations..

For some teams this makes sense.. Ferrari and Charles, that makes no sense.. But then neither does hiring a pensioner, when there are 17 to 19 yr olds that are faster and cheaper, that think faster, that might not whine as much..

If you are building for the post 2030, then you hire 2 noobs, 2x 17 to 19 yr olds, that by the 2031 season are really in to the team, seasoned, over 100 events each, dialed in.. Keeping the almost and post 40 yr olds..for 2031--> makes no sense, as soon as the new regs kick in, they are older and more useless than 3 yr old expired milk..
 
They bring in the sponsor money, however, and in the end, that is arguably the most-important line item on their CV.

For example, next time Lando and Piastri are standing in front of their sponsor wall, look how many corporate logos are present.

Lewis is a pensioner, but that monthly check is not paid out of Ferrari's bank. It is paid out of all the Tier One sponsors he brought with him from Mercedes. And while Kimi looks to be a generational talent who in 5-10 years will having tens of millions of Euro worth of sponsorship deals tied to him, I doubt that is anywhere near the case now. And maybe having Kimi and not Lewis means Mercedes is winning more races, it might also explain why Toto says they cannot afford to develop the car to the level Ferrari can.
 
Fred Vasseur is evidently doing a full-court press on Haas to put Rafael Câmara into Ocon's seat next year. Personally, I think he has the inside shot since Fornaroli is part of McLaren's stable so if something happens to Lando or Oscar, he would be called back and leave Haas in the lurch. There are "no beds at the inn" for Ferrari until at least 2028 and possibly 2029 and Bearman may decide he doesn't want to wait and jump ship to another opportunity if it becomes available. So having Câmara in Haas, as well, gives Ferrari some insurance. I know Toyota wants Ryō Hirakawa in the seat, but at 32...
 
Lando Norris is following Max Verstappen in becoming a team owner, founding a new junior single-seater team that will compete in multiple sports. Initially, it will be in FIA Formula 3, Italian Formula 4 and FRECA, but they are working to add FIA Formula 2 and British Formula 4, as well.

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.