CWallace
macrumors G5
The general consensus seems to be the AMG and RBFPT PUs will offer two or three tenths advantage per lap due to the higher compression ratio.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
2026 Formula One Season Thread
- Thread starter The-Real-Deal82
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
The general consensus seems to be the AMG and RBFPT PUs will offer two or three tenths advantage per lap due to the higher compression ratio.
Glideslope
macrumors G3
Battery deployment and regeneration and how it’s managed by each driver will be the big story this season. Managing deployment on the straights will be critical IMO. Incredibly high straight line speed, but not too fast.
Engine modes will be more complex as well with deployment. The battery deployment will be controlled by the accelerator. Each engine mode will determine when, and how much battery energy to deploy according to pedal travel. The amount of tweaking with this will be interesting.
pachyderm
macrumors G5
I do have an Apple TV account, US based, and a regualr F1 account... gotta wonder if I'm going to be able to watch any races.
I was able to link my AppleTV subscription and regular F1 account to activate the F1 TV Premium features. I don’t remember the website where I did it. I do remember it took time to find it.
CWallace
macrumors G5
So it sounds like Red Bull have joined Honda, Ferrari and Audi protesting the higher compression "trick" they and Mercedes are employing in their PU which now gives them the majority necessary to engage the FIA and FOM for an immediate rules change to the engines that could take effect prior to the Australian Grand Prix.
www.the-race.com
Mercedes rivals plotting F1 engine rule change for Melbourne
Mercedes’ rivals are hoping to pull together a proposal to change Formula 1’s engine compression ratio rules in time for the start of the season in Australia, The Race has learned
www.the-race.com
When losing becomes unbearable, the only option left is rule-changing.So it sounds like Red Bull have joined Honda, Ferrari and Audi protesting the higher compression "trick" they and Mercedes are employing in their PU which now gives them the majority necessary to engage the FIA and FOM for an immediate rules change to the engines that could take effect prior to the Australian Grand Prix.
Mercedes rivals plotting F1 engine rule change for Melbourne
Mercedes’ rivals are hoping to pull together a proposal to change Formula 1’s engine compression ratio rules in time for the start of the season in Australia, The Race has learned
Apple fanboy
macrumors Ivy Bridge
The trouble is at this late stage changing the rules gives Mercedes a disadvantage. Not changing the rules gives Mercedes an advantage.
So what do you do? One team always interprets the rules better than others. It’s always been the way with F1. Always will be.
So what do you do? One team always interprets the rules better than others. It’s always been the way with F1. Always will be.
pachyderm
macrumors G5
Glideslope
macrumors G3
Absolutely. Nothing new here other than the changing cast of characters.
Glideslope
macrumors G3
So it sounds like Red Bull have joined Honda, Ferrari and Audi protesting the higher compression "trick" they and Mercedes are employing in their PU which now gives them the majority necessary to engage the FIA and FOM for an immediate rules change to the engines that could take effect prior to the Australian Grand Prix.
Mercedes rivals plotting F1 engine rule change for Melbourne
Mercedes’ rivals are hoping to pull together a proposal to change Formula 1’s engine compression ratio rules in time for the start of the season in Australia, The Race has learned
It’s interesting since RBPT has such a large number of former AMG PU Engineers. AMG must have made significant advances. Personally I believe this is advanced metallurgy.
CWallace
macrumors G5
I see two options for the FIA:
Option One is to treat this like they did blown diffusers in 2009 and just tell the teams that don't have variable compression ratios to just develop it under the existing Additional Development and Update Opportunities (ADUO) rules and accept they will be spending some of the ADUO allowances in developing the technology rather than general performance reliability upgrades.
Option Two is for the FIA to rule it illegal for 2027 and the advantage AMG and RBFPT have in 2026 might be offset in 2027 by needing to spend ADUO money on removing it rather than general performance reliability upgrades.
My guess will depend on how the first quarter to third of the season works out. If Mercedes and other AMG PU teams run away with the championship due to the engine advantage, they will probably choose Option Two because you know there will be much howling from the F1 fanbase about how "boring" it is that one team (or PU) is dominating.
If the non-VCR teams are able to stay competitive for other reasons (better aerodynamics, better electrical energy strategy, more tracks not favoring VCR) then I could see them doing Option One.
Option One is to treat this like they did blown diffusers in 2009 and just tell the teams that don't have variable compression ratios to just develop it under the existing Additional Development and Update Opportunities (ADUO) rules and accept they will be spending some of the ADUO allowances in developing the technology rather than general performance reliability upgrades.
Option Two is for the FIA to rule it illegal for 2027 and the advantage AMG and RBFPT have in 2026 might be offset in 2027 by needing to spend ADUO money on removing it rather than general performance reliability upgrades.
My guess will depend on how the first quarter to third of the season works out. If Mercedes and other AMG PU teams run away with the championship due to the engine advantage, they will probably choose Option Two because you know there will be much howling from the F1 fanbase about how "boring" it is that one team (or PU) is dominating.
If the non-VCR teams are able to stay competitive for other reasons (better aerodynamics, better electrical energy strategy, more tracks not favoring VCR) then I could see them doing Option One.
pachyderm
macrumors G5
headlessmike
macrumors 68000
I kind of like it. Beats just a simple black and white car. Makes me wish teams were allowed to use different liveries for their two cars. For reference.
pachyderm
macrumors G5
CWallace
macrumors G5
Cadillac did a far better job of integrating two liveries.
And the final BAR 01 livery was in no small part the team giving the middle finger to Bernie and the FIA for not letting them run the two separate liveries.
Glideslope
macrumors G3
headlessmike
macrumors 68000
I remember that. It’s a similar idea but much more jarring if you ask me. A prime example of why it would’ve been better to let them run different liveries.
pachyderm
macrumors G5
You have 11 teams in F1, within the 11 teams, across all 11 teams, 90% all went to the same sort of university, had the same education, same access to software, so why do we have teams that really should be in F5, and the rest in maybe F2,5? Where is the real F1 teams?
Will 2026 be a year full of excuses "New regs..blah blah.." plenty of verbage, but nothing much to say??
So should we scrap 2026, whoever wins, is not a true winner, we should really start saying F1 champs from year 3? So 2029 is the 1st real year of proper F1 under new regs???
Will 2026 be a year full of excuses "New regs..blah blah.." plenty of verbage, but nothing much to say??
So should we scrap 2026, whoever wins, is not a true winner, we should really start saying F1 champs from year 3? So 2029 is the 1st real year of proper F1 under new regs???
Madonepro
macrumors 65816
I'm used to your remarks, but this one has me 'perplexed', to extrapolate your argument, perhaps you could formulate a table, with where each driver went to university, what they studied etc...
Last edited: