It's a shame they don't offer any SSD or Fusion Drive option for the base 21". That will mean that the cheapest config with the fusion drive will be at least $1750.
It's really simple.IMHO is impossible to agree with Apple. Since ever, iMac accept upgrades for RAM or HD and it has no impact for design or price. It's not aways easy to buy an iMac with a RAM upgrade, sometimes you just buy what the store has in stock and some people wants to have the right to upgrade things.
Apple is moving to fast through the direction to unify all the lines. The same lack of possibilities to upgrades that you find in iPad, iPhone and iPod is coming on the computers.
Has anyone found out if the new iMacs use 3.5" or 2.5" hard drives?
I keep thinking they might have switched to 2.5" drives to make them thinner...
I'm glad to hear that the 27 inch model is upgradable the second I saw the new design I was thinking... "Oh crap... no upgradable ram?"
I'm still on last years 27 inch though and I'm poor now, so I shall be sticking with my Fat 27inch iMac.
I wonder if they'll upgrade the Thunderbolt monitor to look this sexy...
When they upgrade the Mac Pro next year, it'll be the second thing they do. Imagine it being as thin as this iMac, but actually thin and not ugly as from the back![]()
Of course, Apple's "ExpressCache" it's not as innovative as they say. Actually it's pretty outdated. I would hope this approach in the new MBPro retina.
IMHO is impossible to agree with Apple. Since ever, iMac accept upgrades for RAM or HD and it has no impact for design or price
It's really simple.
If Apple sees a lot of complaints combined with a dip in sales, they will reconsider.
All I want to do it upgrade my 5 year old iMac with the cheap 21.5" model. But since I need it to edit HD video, I can't use the 5400RPM HD unless I buy a $400 TB external, which is about the same price as buying the 27" faster model, which I both dont want a screen that large or spend that much money. Bad spot. Spend too much money on an iMac or build a Hackentosh? Urgh.
Optical media is now obsolete, just like when Apple killed the floppy drive for the same reason. It is time to let go of old legacy technology and embrace new technology.
As Phil Schiller stated during the keynote, the external optical drive is for "those living in the past".
----------
Sure. Welcome to the future where we avoid 1080P content and are happy with sub standard 720P or nothing. The future were we actually embrace our past.
----------
This new iMac I believe is Jony Ivey gone wild. From what we have read so far, I don't think anyone can really say NO to Jony as per Steve's biography. So Jony did the design and asked the hardware guys to fit their stuff in there. And this is the best the hardware guys can do. (A guess of course which seems very probable)
Need someone with common sense than design sense to balance the equation.
Who will that be at Apple?
For one thing, there IS already the possibility of doing 1080p video content with mechanisms other than reading it from optical discs.
Blu-Ray, like standard DVD movies that came before them, inherently suck because they're encrypted with keys the movie industry demands royalties be paid on by everyone building hardware or software to play them back. There are plenty of ways to encode a movie digitally. The industry just arbitrarily picked a format and locked it down so they could milk extra profits from it for as long as people kept using it.
I know most consumers don't care, as long as they can stick the disc in a drive and watch the movie. But Apple is really right, IMO. The format needs to go away, and digital distribution is probably the one viable thing right now that will push it towards obsolescence.
I mean ... consider the fact that NOBODY running a free, open-source operating system can legally watch a DVD movie using it, simply because the decoders out there all illegally decrypt the content (refused to pay the licensing fee on code they give away absolutely free in the first place!). You're literally breaking federal law every time you use Linux to watch a DVD movie you bought at the store! How stupid is that??
Optical media is now obsolete, just like when Apple killed the floppy drive for the same reason. It is time to let go of old legacy technology and embrace new technology.
----------
It might be obsolete, but I still have friends and family that stiill want CDs and DVDs, I still buy DVDs that I rip to watch on Apple TV or iPad and CDs still sound better than iTunes purposes. I would guess that the majority of iMac users still use their optical drives, it's still useful technology.
For one thing, there IS already the possibility of doing 1080p video content with mechanisms other than reading it from optical discs.
Blu-Ray, like standard DVD movies that came before them, inherently suck because they're encrypted with keys the movie industry demands royalties be paid on by everyone building hardware or software to play them back. There are plenty of ways to encode a movie digitally. The industry just arbitrarily picked a format and locked it down so they could milk extra profits from it for as long as people kept using it.
I know most consumers don't care, as long as they can stick the disc in a drive and watch the movie. But Apple is really right, IMO. The format needs to go away, and digital distribution is probably the one viable thing right now that will push it towards obsolescence.
I mean ... consider the fact that NOBODY running a free, open-source operating system can legally watch a DVD movie using it, simply because the decoders out there all illegally decrypt the content (refused to pay the licensing fee on code they give away absolutely free in the first place!). You're literally breaking federal law every time you use Linux to watch a DVD movie you bought at the store! How stupid is that??
I'll keep my 2011 21.5" iMac thanks. I get a 7200 RPM drive and can upgrade the RAM myself up to 32GB. I don't care if my computer is thin, I care if it's functional. Apple is going too far with their drive for thinness.
I was going to buy, but with the 21.5 model coming with a 5400 rpm drive, it's a no sale. Even with Fusion Drive, it's still a 5400 rpm drive. There are 7200 rpm drives available Apple. I'd rather you just made it a 128GB SSD and let it be. I'll be sticking with my iMac mid 2010 for the foreseeable future. Hopefully they change their tune in 2013. 27" is way too big and certainly too expensive for my needs. If this continues in 2013, I'll move to Windows 8, along with the rest of my devices. If this is how they want to play it, then let's play the game.
For one thing, there IS already the possibility of doing 1080p video content with mechanisms other than reading it from optical discs.
Blu-Ray, like standard DVD movies that came before them, inherently suck because they're encrypted with keys the movie industry demands royalties be paid on by everyone building hardware or software to play them back. There are plenty of ways to encode a movie digitally. The industry just arbitrarily picked a format and locked it down so they could milk extra profits from it for as long as people kept using it.
I know most consumers don't care, as long as they can stick the disc in a drive and watch the movie. But Apple is really right, IMO. The format needs to go away, and digital distribution is probably the one viable thing right now that will push it towards obsolescence.
I mean ... consider the fact that NOBODY running a free, open-source operating system can legally watch a DVD movie using it, simply because the decoders out there all illegally decrypt the content (refused to pay the licensing fee on code they give away absolutely free in the first place!). You're literally breaking federal law every time you use Linux to watch a DVD movie you bought at the store! How stupid is that??
It doesn't seem like many are happy with the new iMac... makes you wonder what the hell they where thinking during R&D.