I haven't seen it in writing anywhere, but I think you have 30 days to exchange a purchase if it is replaced by a new model. (Provided that you bought it directly from Apple.)
The one concern I do have is the fact that I don't have a case for it. After one day of using it and seeing all the scratches start to form on the back, I knew I had to do something until the new cases came out! I bought a cheap screen protector to put on the back to save it in the meantime (it doesn't really fit or stick very well but at least its covered). I ordered a case-mate clear shield. Anyone have experiences with those?
I have a question. How is it that MS can release Zune 3.0 to previous Zune owners for free, but Apple can't? Same with the updates to the Wii, 360, and PS3 that add new functionality. How can they do that for free but Apple charges?
How can they do that for free but Apple charges?
I am not comparing the product themselves at all. I was merely talking about the upgrades that are offered for free even to users of older units. This upgrade even includes games. The point being why it is free for MS and not for Apple.Apple can't what? Do you mean the $9.95 for the 2.0 FW upgrade for iPhone/iPod touch? Ten bucks - who cares? It's still a better product than the Zune. MS is desperately trying to increase market share for the Zune, so they're obviously subsidizing FW development. And the user interface still has a ways to go. They also haven't made any recent changes (read: improvements) to the hardware, aside from increasing the hard drive capacity, compared to Apple's constant hardware upgrades.
So if that is the case then why not make the software update mandatory for the latest version of iTunes. Easy fix and they can give it away for free.I think... mostly.. because it's not a mandatory update - it's an upgrade. It's not something you need or the product won't work. Consider it an expansion pack
I was kinda peeved when they tried to charge for Maps, Stocks, Notes, Mail and Weather though. I thought that much should have come as standard... but the jump to 2.0 and the App Store opens up all kinds of functionality - I have less of a problem with that.
I am not comparing the product themselves at all. I was merely talking about the upgrades that are offered for free even to users of older units. This upgrade even includes games. The point being why it is free for MS and not for Apple.
But the products are the point: if you have a better (and better-selling) product, you don't need to give away things like updates. MS is trying to push the Zune, which has a tiny market share compared to iPods, and they don't want to give potential customers even more reason not to buy one. It's typical corporate action. Apple could give away the update too, but they have less incentive to.
Yes, he means the $20 they charged for new features, then the the $10 they charged for 2.0 (which screwed the people who bought the first). It's not exactly a big deal, but it is something to consider.Apple can't what? Do you mean the $9.95 for the 2.0 FW upgrade for iPhone/iPod touch? Ten bucks - who cares? It's still a better product than the Zune. MS is desperately trying to increase market share for the Zune, so they're obviously subsidizing FW development. And the user interface still has a ways to go. They also haven't made any recent changes (read: improvements) to the hardware, aside from increasing the hard drive capacity, compared to Apple's constant hardware upgrades.
Yes, he means the $20 they charged for new features, then the the $10 they charged for 2.0 (which screwed the people who bought the first). It's not exactly a big deal, but it is something to consider.
And what constant hardware upgrades? You mean changing the form factor? That's a preference and considering the new iPod nano changed to a similar form of the year old Zune, it don't see what your getting at.
So if that is the case then why not make the software update mandatory for the latest version of iTunes. Easy fix and they can give it away for free.
...What? There would be almost 0% incentive to purchase anew! Simple business.
The iPhone kinda bucks that idea doesn't it?
So in essence hardware upgrades is what makes the new iPhone worth buying even if you already have the old one. Sounds like a pretty good model for the iPod Touch to follow to me. Allow the OS to be updated to the latest one for free and make the difference in models hardware based.Uh... no? 2G iPhone customers aren't getting GPS or 3G even after they get the 2.x software. Just like First gen touch customers aren't getting a slimmer cheaper device with integrated speakers and volume controls...
So your options are to carry on as before, pay to get that optional functionality upgrade, or you buy anew and you get that plus other features as standard.
So in essence hardware upgrades is what makes the new iPhone worth buying even if you already have the old one. Sounds like a pretty good model for the iPod Touch to follow to me. Allow the OS to be updated to the latest one for free and make the difference in models hardware based.
but it's more enticing as a whole packageI can live without an integrated speaker...
I have to pay? I might as well get a new one...the price on them just came down anyway
The hardware alone isn't enough though if you're offering comparable OS functionality for free. Again, BUSINESS - there'd be no real incentive to buy anew but it's more enticing as a whole package
iTook my old touch back and got the new one! I'm on of right now! LOL! The new one = omg leet hax how did I ever liv with the old one so über bat life I'm like WTF watch barack debates all day and have good charge lawl!!!!!
Is it just me or does the Beck album on the iPod touch (apple store home page) make it look really ugly?
They shoulda picked different album art. Or just used the ipod touch home screen.