Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Trowaman said:
my bad, I fixed it.
Big deal, blasphemous is hardly the right word. I don't hold suisidists in high reguard, and his music... I'll stop, someone here here will cry like a schoolgirl if I go on.
 
greg75, whatever helps you sleep at night when you defend obvious rip-off sites like that... Call up Sony, Island, DefJam, or Warner, or any other record company and ask if that site has ever paid them a dime. You obviously are intelligent enough to know you are just defending to defend. The soap box must be nice from up there. We BOTH know the record companies get $0 from Russia... :rolleyes:
 
Thor74 said:
greg75, whatever helps you sleep at night when you defend obvious rip-off sites like that... Call up Sony, Island, DefJam, or Warner, or any other record company and ask if that site has ever paid them a dime.
Oh great. Another person who doesn't know how compulsory licensing works.

If your ignorance helps you sleep at night, good for you.
 
In the interests of being constructive…

greg75 said:
Oh great. Another person who doesn't know how compulsory licensing works.

If your ignorance helps you sleep at night, good for you.

Just so when I wake up tomorrow, I don't have to read this post a dozen times or more, here is a link which from Wikipedia which is the redirect from Compulsory Licensing.

Personally, I would say that the whole issue is based on whether the copyright holders are receiving payment and are accepting that payment.

If you accept the payment, you don't have a leg to stand on; if you're recieving a payment based on a unilaterally imposed contract (which would normally be considered an unfair contract in any 'civilised' legal system in the world), you'd be better advised to keep the cheque uncashed as evidence that the party understands that they need to pay for the usage of your property and then go after them using the WTO, Berne Convention and other mechanisms.

The other part of this position would be that, if the Russian Federation wants to be part of the G8 and the WTO, it should start to play by the rules of the commercially developed world.
 
The MacObserver says that Apple had 3 million copies of iTunes 4.5 downloaded in the last week. Damn those Xserve's are getting a work out.
 
It was a good free iTunes download week for me. I got all the free ones from iTunes (8) and 1 from Ben and Jerry's, ... and there's still more free ... so nice.
 
Flowbee said:
You are all fooling yourselves if you think that this Russian company has negotiated rights to distribute music online (inside or outside of Russia) and that they're paying royalties to the record companies.

Well yeah. allofmp3.com claim that they have a licensing agreement with the "Russian Multimedia and Internet Society" but there doesn't appear to be any such thing. The closest to it would be these guys, but the English names being used by each party are different enough to make one say "hnnh?"

If someone who writes Russian well wants to try and get the real scoop, there are contact addresses at the bottom of that page, web at roms dot ru and roms at roms dot ru.
 
Does anyone else think the implementation of iMixes is REALLY poor? Unless I’ve drastically missed something you can’t easily browse or search through the iMix lists which as it stands is insanely long. So say I’m looking for something possibly folk I should be able to do some form of adv search in iTMS and simply search or turn the browser feature on and simply browse through the list. IMHO as it stands iMix is next to useless unless some tweaks are done to allow easy browsing. Please correct me if I’m wrong and you can somehow do the above because I can’t seem to find a way to do it. Fantastic concept on the part of Apple. Somewhat poor implementation.
 
Porchland said:
From the press release:

“Our third generation iTunes Music Store just blows away any other online music service,” said Steve Jobs, Apple’s CEO.

The press release might as well have started: "Dear Sony."

Get em, Steve!!

:D ROTFLMAO!!! :D

So true...
 
greg75 said:
Whoever sold it to you committed a crime. Which is different from allofmp3.com, which claims to be paying royalties. If they are, it's not pirating.

If Allofmp3.com is not breaking the law in Russia, then it's not illegal for me to buy stuff from Allofmp3.com just as it's not illegal for me to buy CDs and DVDs from other countries over the Internet.

Oh please. It's not so much an issue of legality, it's an issue of morality. The people getting screwed at the end of the day, by even legal download services like iTunes, are the artists.

They're just getting less screwed than if people steal their music via p2p or if people support crap, "questionable" :rolleyes:, sites like allofmp3.com which doubtfully give anything back through the appropriate channels.
 
dontmatter said:
So, how many copies of itunes 4.5 downloaded? hmm. Perhaps they didn't publish that b/c it's a bit dissapointing? I know plenty of people not downloading it b/c of lack of mytunes.

"Cupertino, California-based Apple reported 3 million downloads of iTunes 4.5, which incorporates the online music store, since its release last week".

Yeah, pretty dissapointing. :rolleyes: ;) :D
 
dontmatter said:
So, how many copies of itunes 4.5 downloaded? hmm. Perhaps they didn't publish that b/c it's a bit dissapointing? I know plenty of people not downloading it b/c of lack of mytunes.

3 million according to a Reuters story - of course, what you really needed to know is how many of those are upgrades. And what %age of the pre-existing iTunes user base that represents.
 
MacQuest said:
Oh please. It's not so much an issue of legality, it's an issue of morality. The people getting screwed at the end of the day, by even legal download services like iTunes, are the artists.
Oh I agree. I don't use iTMS or Allofmp3.com. I stick to good old CDs (not that artists get paid fairly from CD sales, but I digress).
MacQuest said:
They're just getting less screwed than if people steal their music via p2p or if people support crap, "questionable" :rolleyes:, sites like allofmp3.com which doubtfully give anything back through the appropriate channels.
What's crap about the site? That they don't offer DRM? :D
 
sw1tcher said:
Dont forget the 50,000 free songs Ben & Jerry's were giving away too.

I got 2.

I've won 2 from the Ben & Jerry's vote pledge also. It surprised me that my wife and I also won. The pledges were done within minutes of each other.

Do you happen to know where to find the poper area to enter the code for the free song? Thanks in advance!
 
Thor74 said:
greg75, whatever helps you sleep at night when you defend obvious rip-off sites like that... Call up Sony, Island, DefJam, or Warner, or any other record company and ask if that site has ever paid them a dime. You obviously are intelligent enough to know you are just defending to defend. The soap box must be nice from up there. We BOTH know the record companies get $0 from Russia... :rolleyes:

I think that statement is really funny in light of this article:

http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2004/may/may4a_04.html
 
SiliconAddict said:
Does anyone else think the implementation of iMixes is REALLY poor? Unless I’ve drastically missed something you can’t easily browse or search through the iMix lists which as it stands is insanely long. So say I’m looking for something possibly folk I should be able to do some form of adv search in iTMS and simply search or turn the browser feature on and simply browse through the list. IMHO as it stands iMix is next to useless unless some tweaks are done to allow easy browsing. Please correct me if I’m wrong and you can somehow do the above because I can’t seem to find a way to do it. Fantastic concept on the part of Apple. Somewhat poor implementation.

One thing that surprised me is the list of top iMixes on the page of each album. It's another nice alternative to "people who bought this also bought...."
 
iMeowbot said:
Well yeah. allofmp3.com claim that they have a licensing agreement with the "Russian Multimedia and Internet Society" but there doesn't appear to be any such thing. The closest to it would be these guys, but the English names being used by each party are different enough to make one say "hnnh?"

If someone who writes Russian well wants to try and get the real scoop, there are contact addresses at the bottom of that page, web at roms dot ru and roms at roms dot ru.

I think it's just the translation. If you go to the Russian version of AllOfMp3.com and click on the legal link it refers to the POMC (in the same place it refers to "Russian Multimedia and Internet Society" in the English version). POMC is the organization to which you refer (as can be seen here: http://www.roms.ru/ )
 
More allofmp3.com legality clarification.

This is from the legal page on the website.

Liability Limitations and Rules of Allofmp3.com Services Use

Before you continue browsing the site (registration on this site), you are to read and agree with all the clauses of the following document. In case you disagree with any of the clauses, you have no right to continue browsing the site (registration on this site), and must immediately leave it.

You agree with the fact that you are not able to use and even to download audio and video materials from Allofmp3.com catalogue if it is in the conflict with legislation of your country. Allofmp3.com Administration is unable to control all Allofmp3.com users, therefore the users are responsible for usage of the materials represented on the Site.

It appears that the laws of the country you are in while downloading/using material from the site may come into play.
 
scraemondaemon said:
This is from the legal page on the website.
It appears that the laws of the country you are in while downloading/using material from the site may come into play.

They certainly come into play. However, the copyright laws that come into play are only those of the originating country (the country where the copying is taking place). That's why the US and European countries have been pushing hard (due to efforts of the MPAA/RIAA-type lobbies no doubt) to get other countries to implement DMCA-like copyright laws.

For instance, the US could enact a law prohibiting bringing any kind of music or video into the US from another country without a permit. In that case, even though AllOfMP3.com might be able to legally make and sell copies, I would be breaking US law by bringing that file into the US via the download.

Rather than try to understand the laws of each country or state, it's simpler to put a vague legal statement offloading the responsibility to the consumer.
 
Redeeming songs by 4/30

Not only did iTunes Music Store have updated Pepsi buttoms saying to 'redeem by 4/30' within days of that date but Apple sent me out numerous e-mails reminding me too...

Christopher

Freg3000 said:
Every single one of those Pepsi caps had a Redeem by 4/30/04 warning on them. In the Music Store, it said Redeem Song, and underneath it, Redeem by April 30 was written. Numerous Mac websites had threads and reminders that all credits must be redeemed by the 30th. If I were Apple, I would not have refunded the credits.

And claiming that allofmp3.com is legal is quite a stretch; it may be legal via Russian laws, but is almost assuredly illegal elsewhere. Do you think that the the Beatles catalogue is on allofmp3.com legally?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.