Both technologies exist. You can do 180 VR 3D or 360 VR 3D. But the resolution needs to be massive to make a 360 VR 3d Image look good.
There are way more examples of great apps that outpace Apple's than of Apple pulling apps from their store because they are better. Most of Apple's apps are free so there is no monetary reason for them to pull a better app unless it's a battery hog or violates app store policy. Apple is more likely to just buy the developer than pull their app out of some kind of petty jealousy. Of course Apple also wants you to buy their latest hardware, but that hardware is generally designed years in advance of the software ecosystems so even if they can, they don't want to break their long term plans by leapfrogging themselves on features. I personally don't have a problem with side loading either, but unlike Android, iOS just wasn't designed for it and 99% of Apple users don't need or care about it.
I think it was released a few iOS versions ago, the ability to use multiple cameras at once, maybe in iOS 15
Banned for reason AAPL-42: Brazenly Using Low Level Software or Hardware to Improve Technicality
Huh? There have been apps that record from 2 cameras for years?
Apple showed it being used in one of their behind the scene videos. Name an app they banned because it became popular. People are straight out lying unless they are misinformed.
Thanks for the links. I hadn't read too much on that but did see it get referenced in the recent allegations of Facebook spying on Snapchat traffic by way of MITM attacks.Are you looking for something like this?
Bitcoin Scam App Approved by Apple Robs iPhone User of $600,000+
A scam bitcoin app that was designed to look like a genuine app was accepted by Apple's App Store review team and ended up costing iPhone user...www.macrumors.com
Fake LastPass App Sneaks Past Apple's Review Team
Popular password management app LastPass is warning customers about a fraudulent app that uses a similar name and icon to attempt to trick LastPass...
Facebook will shut down its spyware VPN app Onavo | TechCrunch
Facebook will end its unpaid market research programs and proactively take its Onavo VPN app off the Google Play store in the wake of backlash followingtechcrunch.com
Facebook Removing Onavo VPN From App Store After Apple Says It Violates Data Collection Policies
Facebook today removed VPN app Onavo Protect from the iOS App Store after Apple decided that it violates App Store data collection policies, reports...
Facebook today removed VPN app Onavo Protect from the iOS App Store after Apple decided that it violates App Store data collection policies, reports The Wall Street Journal.
Apple earlier this month told Facebook officials that the Onavo app, which serves as a virtual private network, violates June App Store rules that prevent apps from harvesting data to build advertising profiles or contact databases.
Onavo, a free VPN, promised to "keep you and your data safe when you browse and share information on the web," but the app's real purpose was tracking user activity across multiple different apps to learn insights about how Facebook customers use third-party apps.
arstechnica.com
But are there 1700 people who bought the AVP and did not return it yet? 😉If my math is right, the developer only needs to sell a little under 1,700 of these apps to buy an AVP with the profits (accounting for the 30% app store fee).
Which is ironic because I heard the App Store was inspired by a 3rd party app store (required jailbreaking), that got Apple to eventually open their own.
Agreed. I followed the link, but once I saw the developer was “
| 天吴 |
Hype? The problem with 3D was the TV manufactures with piss poor tech except maybe LG, I heard the C6 had great 3D for a TV. The ghosting, cross talk along with really lazy piss poor and sometimes lame 3D post production from movie studios eh Disney/Marvel to name one is at fault for 3D woes. Not to mention, well just a little, studios wanting to kill physical media for the inferior streaming. 3D is still alive elsewhere but rough to in the U.S. 3D wasn't really all hype because it was killed for various reasons here in the U.S.
Would it make ya feel safer if the developer was Google, Meta, Microsoft and etc...because these companies would never employ spyware?
You think Apple has to reverse engineer using their own camera and video file format? Just because they do not enable a feature doesn't mean they do not know how. People here complain if they don't enable a feature and and then complain twice as much when they do.
forums.macrumors.com
Any of the LG 3D TVs have pretty good passive 3D and the 4K OLEDs are great. I have an E6 and hope it never breaks. The initial active 3D were a mediocre, expensive start, and the lack of 3D media was only exacerbated by stupid "exclusives" like bundling deals where you had to buy a Panasonic TV or Bluray player to get Avatar 3D, or buy a Samsung TV to get Shrek 3D. (I don't recall Marvel/Disney doing any of those exclusives, and their discs were usually some of the better ones, though I won't forgive them for leaving my Marvel collection incomplete by abandoning 3D outside of Japan, and dropping iTunes Digital Copies in Canada.) By the time the passive TVs came around, even I was sick of dealing with the various crap, but am very happy I still cared enough to buy the E6. I'm a 3D fanatic, but if I were to write a paper on how NOT to introduce a product, the 3D TV introduction would be the perfect example.
How is it an anti-customer decision when a 3rd party developer has a paid app that is better than Apple? That makes no sense.
