8? why didn't you just get a unibody...
I did after the 8th exchange.
8? why didn't you just get a unibody...
it does come down to personal preferences but im not here to talk about that.
apple is being fairly very cheap on producing 2 very similar items and calling them 2 different designs and charging 300$ more. Yes its true the 13" unibody has a better track pad and LCD but, thats probably the ONLY thing that really does thats Really noticeably different. specs are almost very identical and i read earlier about someone 2 different keyboards? to that person I Have both Unibody and Plastic 13" Keyboards Are NOT different At ALL just the fact if you pay 900$ more you get the light up one.
I prefer the whitw MacBook to the aluminum one. I think that the plastic is more durable because it will flex and not dent, and it has a firewire port. The DDR2 vs. DDR3 is not a huge issue for most of the MB's target market, but firewire, durability, and price are.
I prefer the whitw MacBook to the aluminum one. I think that the plastic is more durable because it will flex and not dent, and it has a firewire port. The DDR2 vs. DDR3 is not a huge issue for most of the MB's target market, but firewire, durability, and price are.
I did after the 8th exchange.
i had a perfectly working macbook nano (an msi wind hackintosh) but the durability of the unibody construction won me over. this is a laptop that will not "flex" or "give." after less than a year with my 17" mbp i could tell that there was some flex where the superdrive was.
also, the multitouch glass trackpad is so nice. I almost gave up my mouse to use it all the time.
i'm surprised to hear about the astigmatism issue. LED is just a backlight, it isn't the actual screen (vs the old CCFL)
Aluminium flexes far more than plastic. Ever seen a 3 year old Nalgene bottle "flex"? Ever see a 7 year old IBM Thinkpad? Yes, it's plastic, and it's fine.
The physical advantage of the Unibody MBPs is how they're manufactured. It really doesn't have much to do with the aluminium itself. The "classic" MBP, and older PowerBook creak as well over time. That's what you get from a laptop that is built by screwing together a LOT of different external pieces together. This was the motivation Ives described for the unibody construction, no? In a way, ALL laptops on the market other than Apple's new laptops will feel a tiny bit less durable. However, they tend to last for years upon years if the owner is lucky.
I've seen PowerBooks and iBooks that have lasted for 7 years. All Mac laptops are durable enough to last that long, even without babying. However, the Unibody does feel like it's more durable, even though they'll all last years and years with the right amount of luck, and a bit of care. Actual results may vary over time.
Can I ask what you exchanged them for?
I mean I dislike the whitebook as well....
but 8?!
Most had crooked lids, one had a screw missing, another didn't even boot (? on folder).
I love how people say how the Whitebook feels weak, like you got construction worker's hands. lol
it's durable. and worth every bit.
I love how people say how the Whitebook feels weak, like you got construction worker's hands. lol
it's durable. and worth every bit.
Here's why the aluminium model costs more than the plastic: Because people are willing to pay $300 for aluminium.
The specs don't warrant any real extra charge. Performance benchmarks have shown that.
The cost of the aluminium case versus the cost of the plastic case definitely also costs Apple a bit more money, but not as much as you'd think for the additional $300 Apple is asking for. This is especially true now that aluminium prices have dropped to HALF its value from 6 months ago. It's costing Apple less to make one today than last month.
There's no reason for Apple to charge $300 for the UniBody model due to the laptop itself. Sure, the unibody construction does make it feel sturdier. However, that's not worth it. The reason Apple charges $300 more is because some people are willing to pay $300 for $20 (just an example) in tangible value:
1. If Apple make something more expensive, it's a bit more exclusive. That makes owners happy. Same with watches. A $50 Timex may actually tell time better than a mechanical Breguet that costs $20000 (quartz is more accurate than mechanical), and yet Brequets cost as much as a car because even Napoleon Bonaparte owned a fracking Brequet. How exclusive is THAT.
2. People are shallow and are willing to pay the extra $300 for appearance. It's not just about function. That's why people have a hard time choosing clothes, no? If it was all about function, we'd all be wearing the same thing. Sometimes it's about standing out, and the "Look At Me!!" factor.
That's life, capitalism, and being a human.![]()
I did. DDR3 is more future proof. You are not paying for speed, but for proofing yourself in a near future. as for HDD, it depends on your needs. If you need it now, its a good deal, else you can wait.
what the HELL are you Talking about? future proof? MANY computers use DDR2 and Will until around the year 2011~2012. so exactly what are you saying about Future proofing?
MANY computers use DDR2 and Will until around the year 2011~2012. so exactly what are you saying about Future proofing?
Well stated good sir / madam.
Actually, that's not really why buying a laptop with DDR3 is more "futureproof". Besides, I doubt MANY computers will be using DDR2 in 2011-2012, and the ones that do will be old and need replacing. If you buy a plastic MB today, why would you be upgrading your RAM in 2012 anyway, right? You'll be looking to upgrade your laptop.
DDR3 isn't more futureproof because you don't buy RAM more than once, so if you upgrade to 4 GB of DDR2 RAM today (and DDR2 RAM is very cheap today), you've hit the limit for your system. That's it. It's taken care of. RAM isn't something you need to continuously upgrade, nor do you need to replace them like socks. In the year 2012, there's no reason for you to worry about what type of RAM everyone else's laptop is using in 4 years. It has nothing to do with you.
Thanks.![]()