iMovie lite would be cool to have, but I seem to remember the Sony Ericsson W600i had video editing capabilities, you could even add text and transitions! Man that phone was ahead of its time (for the US).....shame it was orange.
Renaming the aluminum macbooks as macbooks pro makes a lot of sense. The $1600 Aluminum macbook basically acts like the 12" powerbook. It's close in power to the base MacBook pro just missing a dedicated video card. Apple could drop the $1300 aluminum model and make that the high end Macbook and turn the $1600 into a MacBook Pro. If they did that though I think it should get a FW800 if possible to bring it closer to the Macbook pro line. I hear all the time that people want a smaller macbook pro that they can take with them especially photo junkies who want it in the field with them to edit pictures on a small device. THis would also allow Apple to make something around a 10" Macbook without calling it a Macbook nano, that way the Macbook name remains part of the cheaper items. This would round out the macbook pro line nicely with a 13-17" offering.
What would be really interesting is a lower powered 15" MacBook to replace the $1600 model that will be moving to a MBP. More than anything i hear people wanting a 15" macbook but don't need the power of the MBP they just want the screen. THis could make things very interesting. It might cannibalize on the MBP section to add a 15" cheaper macbook but honestly people who need a MBP aren't going to go with an underpowered Macbook just because of the bigger screen, it is for older people who need a large screen (can't see as well) or for someone who just enjoys a larger screen when writing emails or just going online.
So you have the MacBooks being plastic? Seems a little strange as Apple touts the aluminum enclosure being so green, maybe green plastics will help.
If this means, the 13" alu MacBook "Pro" will have a better panel, Firewire and an ExpressCard slot (maybe they can gain the required space by using a non-removable battery) at the same price point, then I am all for itAnd if not... I really do not care what they name it.
I am using the top of the line MacBook Pro 15" (2.93 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo/4GB 1067 MHz DDR3) and the bottom has never even gotten remotely even warm, much less hot even when I'm throwing a lot of stuff at it. It is miles in difference to my 1 generation 17" PowerBook that got super hot and would make this god-awful churning noise if I only used the Calculator.One thing always bother me constantly, which is the cooling system inside MB / MBP
I am sorry to post this here, but all I want to know or all I want Apple to do is delivery a advanced cooling system in the Pro line machine, which can keep the machine cool effectively without extra noise, and that will be Pro done for us.
Maybe liquid cooling system will do some job.
That rebranding, quite honestly, sounds absolutely stupid. The current MacBooks, aluminum or not, are not 'pro' machines. It can even be argued that the current MacBook Pro isn't even a 'pro' machine. Stupid, stupid decision on Apple's part if true.
I am using the top of the line MacBook Pro 15" (2.93 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo/4GB 1067 MHz DDR3) and the bottom has never even gotten remotely even warm, much less hot even when I'm throwing a lot of stuff at it. It is miles in difference to my 1 generation 17" PowerBook that got super hot and would make this god-awful churning noise if I only used the Calculator.
I don't know if what you're running, but the new books are seriously improved.
What would be really interesting is a lower powered 15" MacBook to replace the $1600 model that will be moving to a MBP. More than anything i hear people wanting a 15" macbook but don't need the power of the MBP they just want the screen. THis could make things very interesting. It might cannibalize on the MBP section to add a 15" cheaper macbook but honestly people who need a MBP aren't going to go with an underpowered Macbook just because of the bigger screen, it is for older people who need a large screen (can't see as well) or for someone who just enjoys a larger screen when writing emails or just going online.
So you have the MacBooks being plastic? Seems a little strange as Apple touts the aluminum enclosure being so green, maybe green plastics will help.
I am using the top of the line MacBook Pro 15" (2.93 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo/4GB 1067 MHz DDR3) and the bottom has never even gotten remotely even warm, much less hot even when I'm throwing a lot of stuff at it. It is miles in difference to my 1 generation 17" PowerBook that got super hot and would make this god-awful churning noise if I only used the Calculator.
I don't know if what you're running, but the new books are seriously improved.
Heck, even watching Hulu raises the temp pretty high.
Im really tired of these Pro vs not Pro posts. It is just a name. Get whatever you need to get the job done.
I always thought it would make sense to drop the price (drastically) on the MBA and make the MBA the low cost budget line and drop the macbooks
my vote is to forget the whole touchtablet and refit the air as a 'net book' with a modified iphone OS and a built in 3g card (plus knock the price down say $500) and drop it as a thin notebook (it doesn't really have enough power for much more than net stuff anyway), drop the white macbook, put firewire 800 in the macbooks, knock a couple of hundred off all the laptop prices and toss in iwork for free along with ilife. plus maybe even the first year of mobileme for free. that would draw folks into the game pretty nicely.
Well, that will be a very big move for Apple. Hence it's not gonna happen, dude.![]()
LOL, I like my Macbook Pro more than any other PC's design. And I just want my next Macbook Pro even closer to the real Pro laptop.![]()
The word you're looking for is discrete.
you never know. I mean there has been talk they would never do a netbook and yet now look at the rumors. talk they would never do a cell phone and yet they have done it.
the only talk that I can't see happening is the whole blu-ray thing and that's due to two issues.
1. stats that blu-ray isn't taking off the way folks said it would and downloads are taking off
2. work on dvd disks that can hold up to 1TB of data removing the need for even a 'blu-ray data' disk option
but I won't be shocked if I'm proven wrong