I see your point: inflation sucks!That's a starting price of $6,300 in "today dollars" kiddos.
Stop and think about that for a moment...
I see your point: inflation sucks!That's a starting price of $6,300 in "today dollars" kiddos.
Stop and think about that for a moment...
There's the iPad for them ..... as in, they really do not need a computer at all if browsing, social networking, streaming and so on is their need.
Nothing wrong with that at all, but they do not need a computer in the first place, nor it is the best platform to do those things nowadays.
The point had nothing to do with inflation; denominating in today’s dollars cancels that out.I see your point: inflation sucks!
I don’t understand why people want the Mac to become a Facebook ARM machine. Just use your iPhone for that...
The only reason why researchers and scientists use Macs is because of the x86 and Unix based OS, and let’s hope Tim keeps it that way!
It is cheaper, more affordable, more market shares and makes the ecosystem sustainable. And why is x86 tied to Unix when the OS has nothing to do with the CPU ISA.
Or they could switch to AMD for something better.
An ARM-based Mac would still run MacOS, not to worry.I don’t understand why people want the Mac to become a Facebook ARM machine. Just use your iPhone for that...
The only reason why researchers and scientists use Macs is because of the x86 and Unix based OS, and let’s hope Tim keeps it that way!
Well, you raise some good points, but wired connections are going away anyway, and you can use a keyboard and a mouse on the newest iPad.There's (some) truth in your comment, I though prefer a computer, has a trackpad, a full size keyboard, has a wired connection, ports, multiple display options, amongst lots of other reasons.
Sorry, I prefer not to have to replace all my software. Not all those new versions will be free, wiping out the "cost" argument.
Makes you wonder how many are still in use. We still use an Apple IIe at work....
On January 24, 1984, former Apple CEO Steve Jobs introduced the first Macintosh at Apple's annual shareholder's meeting in Cupertino, California, debuting the new computer equipped with a 9-inch black and white display, an 8MHz Motorola 68000 processor, 128KB of RAM, a 3.5-inch floppy drive, and a price tag of $2,495.
Article Link: 36 Years Ago Today, Steve Jobs Unveiled the First Macintosh
That is of coz under the assuming that translation / emulation would work perfectly. Which I am not entirely too sure either. We will know soon enough from Microsoft Windows on ARM experiment.
The ARM based Surface Pro X:
That's for Windows, I don't know if MacOS wil be different, but I am not encouraged.
- Drivers for hardware, games and apps will only work if they're designed for a Windows 10 ARM-based PC. .....
- 64-bit (x64) apps won’t work. ....
Our's still works (at least as of 2 years ago), but it doesn't come out of the bag...lol
15 years later I would meet Doug Engelbart,
Not necessarily. Two things they didn’t have back then is a ton of other products making money for the company (so they really needed each and every Mac sale) and all developers using the same IDE... that they control. Any developer currently making money on the Mac that wants to continue will take the pain and recompile. Any developer no longer coding their app for the Mac, likely already got left behind with the cutoff of 32-bit apps, so their customers ALREADY know not to upgrade if they want. That means a lot of folks that won’t upgrade, but, just a blip to the bottom line. Most Macs today are sold to people that have never owned a Mac before, and someone that hasn’t bought a Mac in 5-6 years (price/features not to their liking) will continue to not find price/features to their liking.they will have to support 64bit x64 emulation in order to make a transition to ARM successful.