3D Wow! When

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by zoeconner, Jul 1, 2011.

  1. zoeconner macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    #1
    Do you think its in the near future? What Iphone? I just seen a phone with 3D and it looked pretty cool.
     
  2. Jagardn macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    #2
    I personally don't want it. 3D gives me a headache after a while.
     
  3. F123D macrumors 68040

    F123D

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Location:
    Del Mar, CA
  4. TooSmooth macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    #4
    You should get that phone. If it was indeed the evo 3d
     
  5. Alaerian Guest

    Alaerian

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Location:
    A barstool, Innis & Gunn in hand
  6. zoeconner thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    #6
    I will always have an iphone. It would be cool if it had a adjustment for it like the new DS 3D.
     
  7. pyro008 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    #7
    No. It'll die soon enough. Its a gimmick and a way to make TVs and crap cost more.
     
  8. boss.king macrumors 68040

    boss.king

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    #8
    Simply put, If the iPhone had a 3D screen, it would be time for me to look elsewhere for a phone.
     
  9. Pink∆Floyd macrumors 68020

    Pink∆Floyd

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    Location:
    Up There
    #9
    God. I played the DS 3D and it messed with my eyes and I left the store with a headache...it was really bad :(
     
  10. saving107 macrumors 603

    saving107

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Location:
    San Jose, Ca
    #10
    Couldn't agree more.
     
  11. -aggie- macrumors P6

    -aggie-

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Location:
    Where bunnies are welcome.
    #11
    I’m going to subscribe to this thread, so that when the iPhone gets 3D and everyone is saying how great it is, I can link to here. :D:rolleyes:
     
  12. Orion126 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    #12
    Meh to 3D. I'm not that big a fan of it...never have been.

    I just want a bigger screen, better camera, and faster processor.
     
  13. lilcosco08 macrumors 65816

    lilcosco08

    Joined:
    May 27, 2010
    Location:
    Dayton
    #13
    It would need to have
    -Half resolution
    -Thicker
    -Bigger battery

    OR

    -Twice processing power
    -Twice battery
    -Thicker

    Glasses free 3D works by a parallax barrier sandwiched between 2 lcds which render the same image twice. It would also have to be thicker because the stacked LCDs require twice as much backlighting
     
  14. mtnDewFTW macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Location:
    California
    #14
    I think the iPhone will be able to cook you breakfast before Apple will implement 3D into it. 3D a stupid gimmick that will fade away very soon. We need to keep 3D content where it belongs, in movies.
     
  15. shandyman Suspended

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Location:
    Dublin, Ireland
    #15
    ugh 3D is a stupid gimmick that hopefully goes away soon, the sooner James Cameron gives up on it the better.

    3D is ruining my cinema experience, as my local cinema does 1 2D showing a day of a film as the last showing of the day, the gits.
     
  16. TheUndertow macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    #16
    I bought a fancy big screen for 3D Blu-Ray and have usedit like 3 x in 3D...bah.
     
  17. Fliesen macrumors 6502a

    Fliesen

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    Location:
    Austria
    #17
    3D is meant to create a window into a seemingly 3-dimensional virtual world. ... who needs a 3,5" window? :/

    i AM intrigued by head-tracking though. i'd much rather have that properly implemented than some glasses-free 3D headache machine
     
  18. RebeccaL macrumors 6502a

    RebeccaL

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    #18
    3D is great for movies and games on the 3DS. But not for phones.
     
  19. rick98761 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    #19
    What's with all the 3rd hostility? If done tastefully and not thrown in your face everywhere it does have some real uses. I think we can trust apple would leave it adjustable and not put it everywhere just for the sake of it being 3d. It barley costs any money to make a screen 3rd anymore.
     
  20. Alaerian Guest

    Alaerian

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Location:
    A barstool, Innis & Gunn in hand
    #20
    There's no hostility. Nobody has been hostile.

    3D is, in fact, a gimmick. It (sort of) makes sense on a DS that's built entirely for games. However, on an iPhone, it's silly. A 3D calendar? 3D caller ID? That's just /facepalm worthy.

    Leave 3D to overpriced televisions (that aren't catching on, mind you) and the 3DS. Keep it away from iPhones where it doesn't belong.
     
  21. From A Buick 8 macrumors 68040

    From A Buick 8

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Location:
    Ky Close to CinCinnati
    #21
    Not even there
     
  22. pyro008 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    #22
    Well the televisions are catching on...because you can't find a new TV without 3d. Its just that the usage isn't. I don't understand why they're trying to force this so hard. The average person who actually likes the idea of 3D is not even going to watch many movies in it. Its a novelty that is cool at first (to some) but wears off quickly.
     
  23. macingman macrumors 68020

    macingman

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2011
    #23
    In reply to everyone that says 3D is just a gimmick:
    Do you really think that screens are going to stay 2D forever. To allow future innovation screen technology needs to advance not just in pixels or color range but in depth and "wow factor". 3D is the future, perhaps not in screens we know today but in holographic screens and the like.
     
  24. iceterminal macrumors 68000

    iceterminal

    Joined:
    May 25, 2008
    Location:
    Dallas Tx.
    #24
    If they move the iPhone to a 3D model, I'd be objective about it before I'd look elsewhere. But mostly, I don't need that on a simple phone. Life is 3D enough already. Next they'll want books to be 3D so it has that "cool" look to the text.

    As for the TVs going 3D. Mainly this is because there isn't any new technology for televisions to push. Its been the same for a long time basically. They've come out with plasma, then LCD, and now LED. But then nothing. So in order to sell more, they'll make them all 3D and tell you that you have to get a new set if you want this feature. Thus, profit.

    But even in Japan, the people are massively shunning this move to 3D. I see this as a "betamax" type of fad. It'll stay around for awhile as the manufacturers push it, but then they'll see its a lost cause and pull back.
    All the advertising you see in movies and on TVs is just that, advertising to separate you from your cash.
     
  25. Alaerian Guest

    Alaerian

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Location:
    A barstool, Innis & Gunn in hand
    #25
    The TVs aren't catching on as much as you'd think. I read an article a couple days ago that stated just as much - I'll try to find it if I can. Manufacturers are producing 3D TVs, but people just aren't buying.

    Why?

    ... because it's a gimmick, and expensive at that. You nailed it that the novelty wears off very quickly. The glasses are obnoxious and uncomfortable, and they just don't fit or work for people who already wear corrective glasses.
     

Share This Page