Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Me excited about new chips…
1683996674652.gif
 
I’m really looking forward to the battery efficiency improvements in these new 3 nm chips:


Hmm but doesn't that depend on the efficiency out-stripping the energy requirements of all the new bells and whistles?

I really doubt it's going to be noticeable.
 
M3 + 27” iMac = Win!

Old 27-inch "starting at..." price X3 for the (profit) win. 💰💰💰

With the launch of ASD- which is the 27" minus the computer, keyboard and mouse- successfully sold for the old "starting at..." iMac 27" (whole computer) price, there is no way iMac 27" comes back at that relative "bargain" price. I wonder how much of the longing for this product is driven by recalling the price?

Prepare to be shocked when it is revived. Or recall the old iMac Pro launch for a sneak peak now.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Darajavahus
I’m really looking forward to the battery efficiency improvements in these new 3 nm chips:

Eject some battery and pitch "same great battery life" = reduced cost (for Apple) for "same great price" and thus more profit. 💰💰

OR, raise prices spun as due to "inflation" or "supply chain" or "covid" or "other" for even more profit. 💰💰💰💰
 
Last edited:
I think Apple will introduce a new family of SOCs at WWDC based on 3nm, for whatever product, MacPro or the headset.

performance-wise, sure, there will be a gain but for most people that won't matter in real life, efficiency, yep, better battery life will matter.

meanwhile, as predicted by @Realityck we will see new Macs announced next week - beat you to it Gurman ;)
They need to start making chips top down instead of bottom up. Intel next gen will have flagship i9 first instead of low end mobiles. And I will be upset if the MacBook Air gets M3 before either the Studio gets M2/M3 or we see a Mac Pro. That would just be ridiculous if Air gets updated again.
 
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: Gudi and Colstan
"3nm" seems to be some marketing BS, as you can read on Wikipedia:

The term "3 nanometer" has no relation to any actual physical feature (such as gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch) of the transistors. According to the projections contained in the 2021 update of the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems published by IEEE Standards Association Industry Connection, a 3 nm node is expected to have a contacted gate pitch of 48 nanometers and a tightest metal pitch of 24 nanometers.[14] However, in real world commercial practice, "3 nm" is used primarily as a marketing term by individual microchip manufacturers to refer to a new, improved generation of silicon semiconductor chips in terms of increased transistor density (i.e. a higher degree of miniaturization), increased speed and reduced power consumption.[15][16] Moreover, there is no industry-wide agreement among different manufacturers about what numbers would define a 3 nm node.

That sounds like the "1 inch sensor", which has a much smaller diagonal than 1 inch.
 
Doing my part to convince all of my friends to wait out for the M3 Macs. It would be a shame to be this close to a major leap and settle for a last-gen technology.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: SuperCachetes
It's meaningless to take advantage from node when Apple Silicon's GPU performance is extremely poor as M1,2 cant even close and beat RTX 30 series which is not even TSMC 5nm based. What a shame. Power by watt is not everything and Apple doesn't understand that.
 
3nm is what many people have been waiting for. The M2 seems to be a 5nm stop-gap chip, like many people, including Max Tech have said, that was used by Apple because TSMC did not have their 3nm Fab production ready in time for the M2.

And no wonder TSMC is at capacity M3 Production, when those shiny new M3 devices arrive, anything M2 will be yesterdays news.
 
"3nm" seems to be some marketing BS, as you can read on Wikipedia:

The term "3 nanometer" has no relation to any actual physical feature (such as gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch) of the transistors. According to the projections contained in the 2021 update of the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems published by IEEE Standards Association Industry Connection, a 3 nm node is expected to have a contacted gate pitch of 48 nanometers and a tightest metal pitch of 24 nanometers.[14] However, in real world commercial practice, "3 nm" is used primarily as a marketing term by individual microchip manufacturers to refer to a new, improved generation of silicon semiconductor chips in terms of increased transistor density (i.e. a higher degree of miniaturization), increased speed and reduced power consumption.[15][16] Moreover, there is no industry-wide agreement among different manufacturers about what numbers would define a 3 nm node.

That sounds like the "1 inch sensor", which has a much smaller diagonal than 1 inch.
Whatever the terms used it seems that TSMC is the only manufacturer that’s making advancements I reducing their node size, so much so that Intel is throwing in the towel and ordering 3nm from TSMC.

Intel seems to be struggling to go below 7nm (no matter what Intel names it).


 
  • Like
Reactions: rjjacobson
Chips getting faster for cheaper, once AI creates its own self-improving chip its over for us fellas
 
Don't you mean Austin?

As part of its commitment to US economic growth, Apple today confirmed that its newly redesigned Mac Pro will be manufactured in Austin, Texas.

That was back in 2016 ..... It is 2023 .

Apple is reportedly looking at moving Mac Pro to Vietnam.
"... The 2023 Mac Pro looks likely to be one of the products assembled there, which would mean Apple dropping the “Made in USA” tag used for the 2019 model. ... "

Which gets it out of China (and somewhat reduces the "put it in Austin" chants. ) . Also gets away from 'redundant' factories for a relatively very low rate of production device. Austin never did all of the production for the 2019 model. It was a secondary assembly site for significant parts made elsewhere. It was mainly 'optics' which spun up a second, smaller assembly line, in Austin. Apple didn't plan on doing it then. Probably even less inclined now.


If the Mac Pro keeps it approximate $6K price and looses DIMM RAM , 3rd party GPUs , and socketed bare processor, I doubt they need two factories to cover world wide production. It won't be zero demand , but not going to be several 100's of thousands per year run rate either.


Macbooks seem to be moving also ( and/or on a separate effort ) .

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.