Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm six minutes too late to make the same comment ;)

The answer may be 42, but the question is "What do you get if you multiply six by nine?" The answer only works in rad 13. In rad 13, the number of peripherals connected to the Mac Pro was 33.

Something doesn't add up! :D
 
I can't find accurate info, but I've heard that, when Apple released the first iMac, they did a "USB plugfest" at the Apple HQ. They plugged 127 devices (including hubs) to a single USB port, maxing it out...
 
So what?

Isn't 127 devices the limit for a single USB port?

If I could find enough devices, I'd do the same with my Mac mini, 508 USB devices, I'm-not-sure-how-many daisy-chained FireWire devices, two monitors (mini Displayport and HDMI) and one SD card in the back.

"510+ devices connected to one 2010 Mac mini" :rolleyes:
 
Typical for the new age.


This is a more realistic picture:
Image
[thanks to user "cc bcc" @ arstechnica]

Nailed it.

----------

And the cost for this test was $21567.99

You can see how there is a need for longer cables so everything can fit on the desk.
 
This is a more realistic picture:

Mac-Pro-2013-vs-2012.png

Here's what's funny... many old Mac Pros had just as many external devices plugged into them.

While the old Mac Pro has 4 SATA drives internally... external drives were just as important.

And a few of the devices in that picture are external only... or they're better suited for external use.

An audio interface would be better on a desk anyway so you don't have to crawl behind your desk to plug in a microphone.

And another great thing about external devices... you can use them on your laptop too. Try that with a PCIe card.

There were already many external devices *before* the new Mac Pro was announced.
 
Typical for the new age.


This is a more realistic picture:
Mac-Pro-2013-vs-2012.png

Couldn't possibly up-vote this enough. If you could get the new Thunderbolt based goodness in the old cheese grater enclosure, I'd bet many if not most buyers would choose the old enclosure: You can have 16TB HDDs (4x4TB), plus 3TB PCIe flash (3x1TB), plus 2 Blu-ray drives. That obviates all kinds of external enclosure need.
 
thunderbolt cables used here are more expensive than my apple products combined :D
 
That's a cool demonstration of the power of ThunderBolt, but it probably cost him 1.21 jigadollars. Everything related to TB is a ripoff, especially Apple's cables. Seriously, they're killing their own standard in its infancy. I want Thunderbolt to become cheap already so it doesn't end up like FireWire!

Until then, my pre-2013 Mac Pro is king. Having 4 hard drive bays and 4 PCIe slots is a great convenience. Oh, and I can upgrade my GPU (and have) ;)
 
Why do people get a kick out of unrealistic, impractical uses of technology?

No one would ever daisy chain that much hardware via a non-locking cable. I am sure even the builder wouldn't no where to begin looking if a part of the chain unmounted.

Don't get it either. It's like a builder putting single bricks on top of each other to see when it becomes unstable. Pointless exercise.
 
Typical for the new age.


This is a more realistic picture:
Image
[thanks to user "cc bcc" @ arstechnica]

Great find. Very representative of the state of affairs. I recognise that not everyone who owns a Pro needs extra storage, a DVD drive, etc. but it makes me wonder...if that's the case, why buy a Pro? For those who do, it seems like it would make such a mess.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.