But all of our peecee's eventually slow down due to all the crap
OK, so what if a window opens faster, its still no as pretty
Who really notices these things? I run a TV station and I can tell you that the XP and 2000 systems fail far more than our Macs do. The Windows systems start to sllloooooowwwww dowwwnnn much quicker than the X systems. Our IT department is troubleshooting PC issues a lot more than any Mac issues. On average, I must rebuild or repair the PCs every six months to keep them spunky.
Believe me when I say we have equal parts PC to Mac and my staff all migrate to the Mac systems for stability and reliability. We have run test between our best XP systems and our Mac 2.5s; on the surface, the Macs are better for our purpose.
If you start watching CPU load when you launch a window, I think you have uncovered the reason the Mac windows are beautiful. I'll sacrifice a little CPU load on launch for beauty, but does it make a any real difference how this window performs once open?
Our PC systems run our insertion, robotics, traffic, and encode video for streaming over the WWW. My staff installs just the necessary software and nothing else. When we started loading the same amount of software we do one the OS X systems, the PCs started to slow down, and just try running virus protection with robotics, or video editing software, it does not work!
This from a former PC zealot. Let the bashing begin
iMan said:Have a PB 1.25 myself - and could not be more happy with it: best computer I ever had!
That said; there is a profound difference in the way the GUI reacts in OS X and XP - I actually like it (most of the time), but I get the point that some people would feel the Mac as sluggish...
Here's a little funny trick to see how Quartz graphics loads your CPU just like that:
Open Activity Monitor, and let it show the CPU loads.
Then mark lets say 10 folders and open them simultanously - keep an eye on the monitor.
Do the same with just running the mousepointer across the dock with the magnifyer effect turned on... or just grab a window and shake it vigorously. Some flash animations on a webpage in the background also does a bit of damage...
It is actually devastating to the CPU! Doesn't take much to say that things might pile up a bit with some of this constantly in action.
But; it is not like the computer is anything near unusable or slower than XP - its just that they are different. Some people might not think more to it though...
OK, so what if a window opens faster, its still no as pretty
Believe me when I say we have equal parts PC to Mac and my staff all migrate to the Mac systems for stability and reliability. We have run test between our best XP systems and our Mac 2.5s; on the surface, the Macs are better for our purpose.
If you start watching CPU load when you launch a window, I think you have uncovered the reason the Mac windows are beautiful. I'll sacrifice a little CPU load on launch for beauty, but does it make a any real difference how this window performs once open?
Our PC systems run our insertion, robotics, traffic, and encode video for streaming over the WWW. My staff installs just the necessary software and nothing else. When we started loading the same amount of software we do one the OS X systems, the PCs started to slow down, and just try running virus protection with robotics, or video editing software, it does not work!
This from a former PC zealot. Let the bashing begin