Why somebody else should decide what should we do and how should we do it? Give us options - we will decide by ourselves, thank you.
takes up way too much space.
if your internet can't handle streaming, you're not ready for 4k hdr. which is the majority of the population
which is why 4k Apple TV took so long to come out. not that they couldn't do it, but they were waiting for enough of the population to upgrade to make it worth updating to 4k hdr.
Cancelled my 64GB pre-order right now.
Apple is to blame. They don't support the VP9 codec that YouTube uses for its 4K content. Other TV and streaming device manufacturers have added VP9 support because they know their customers demand YouTube 4K content. Apple has so far failed to do the same, ignoring what their customers want.As i already mentioned in the previous threads, Google has NEVER updated the YouTube app on the ATV4. Its 2 years old. Stop pointing the blame at Apple and ask Google why they NEVER UPDATED THEIR OWN APP.
128GB would hold about 4-5 h.265 movies but that's not the point. ATV doesn't really store content except for apps. It's a streaming box. iTunes does store all downloaded content but Apple seems to be restricting that to 1080p. It could be temporary OS X limitation due to lack of full h.265 support until High Sierra but it's more likely due to studios afraid of piracy.it's likely a storage issue. sure they could probably include a 128gb flash on the apple tv, but that would hold what? 1 or 2 4k movies? at what cost? extra $50-$100 to shell out?
sure you could probably download to your imac then somehow airplay the 4k hdr to your apple tv, but the whole point of a set top box (and what Apple learned from the first version of Apple TV) is to not need a computer to watch movies.
if your internet can't handle it, you're probably not ready for 4k. this is the exact reason why Apple TV 4k took a while to come out. It's not that Apple couldn't figure out how to make a 4k device, but rather they were waiting until the tech was ripe enough to release a 4k streaming device.
Nope. Entirely false. What if I want to watch a 4K video 5 times? Downloading it results in 1x 10GB (assuming that is the max for any 4K content). Streaming it 5 times results in 5x 10GB or 50GB of data in one month.If you just can't stream it because your internet is poor, or you simply prefer to DL then I understand why you would cancel. But to say you have great internet, but the fact that you can't DL because it hits the CAP makes zero sense.
Please tell me you understand that DL a video uses the same amount of data as streaming does.
I don’t know what the fuss is about. You couldn’t download movies on the Apple TV before why is it a huge issue now that you can’t download the 4K version? It has nothing to do with the Apple TVApple seem to go out of their way to not deliver the obvious solution that people want. If it's 4k let it be 4k without silly restrictions.
I don’t know what the fuss is about. You couldn’t download movies on the Apple TV before, why is it a huge issue now that you can’t download the 4K version? It has nothing to do with the Apple TV 4K, maybe your gripe is with ITunes in general not allowing downloads, again, this is probably due to the low price of the 4K movie. For me, I love the fact that my previous movies got upgraded to 4K and that I can rent/Buy movies in 4K. Usually renting from Redbox etc is only the 1080 copy.This is something that every customer should know before they purchase the product. This is a make or break issue. For me it totally breaks it. No Apple TV 4K for me.
If you just can't stream it because your internet is poor, or you simply prefer to DL then I understand why you would cancel. But to say you have great internet, but the fact that you can't DL because it hits the CAP makes zero sense.
Please tell me you understand that DL a video uses the same amount of data as streaming does.
I don’t know what the fuss is about. You couldn’t download movies on the Apple TV before why is it a huge issue now that you can’t download the 4K version? It has nothing to do with the Apple TV
I don’t know what the fuss is about. You couldn’t download movies on the Apple TV before, why is it a huge issue now that you can’t download the 4K version? It has nothing to do with the Apple TV 4K, maybe your gripe is with ITunes in general not allowing downloads, again, this is probably due to the low price of the 4K movie. For me, I love the fact that my previous movies got upgraded to 4K and that I can rent/Buy movies in 4K. Usually renting from Redbox etc is only the 1080 copy.
Apple is to blame. They don't support the VP9 codec that YouTube uses for its 4K content. Other TV and streaming device manufacturers have added VP9 support because they know their customers demand YouTube 4K content. Apple has so far failed to do the same, ignoring what their customers want.
Apple won't add VP9 support. Google won't encode separate HEVC versions of their YouTube 4K content in addition to VP9. Stalemate.
Why should Google spend any time/money updating the YouTube app for Apple TV when Apple does not support VP9? Any updated App could still only support HD and not 4K.
Apple is not just streaming service, it allow you to download stuff. And previous statement was that apple prevent downloading of 4K content to guard us stupid users from management of disk space.Do other streaming services let you download 4K copies to your local hard drive?
[doublepost=1506089311][/doublepost]
Umm, what? Did netflix or hulu give you the option to download? lol. What options are you talking about?
Ok maybe you are not getting it. I was responding to the other persons comment about stating “no Apple TV for me” because he couldn’t download the 4K movie. The latter you speak about is an iTunes issue.People are still not getting this. We are not talking about downloading on the Apple TV directly. We are talking about downloading on a Mac and using Home Sharing.
You still don't get it. Updating the App won't add the ability to stream 4K VP9 content from YouTube. Google would have to encode all of their existing VP9 content stored on their servers to another format that the Apple TV supports. They are not going to do that. Google purchased the format that VP9 is based upon when they bought out On2 Technologies in 2010. Google then made VP9 royalty free so it would cost Apple nothing in licensing to implement VP9. If/when Apple adds support for VP9 you will have a reason to complain if the YouTube App does not get updated. Apple's Safari browser does not support YouTube VP9 content either; is that Google's fault as well?So it's Apple's fault they don't support Googles silly codec? Uhh, no.
Again, Google never bothered to update their ATV4 app. Ever.
At 1080 resolution it only takes me 7 hours to download a movie. 4k should only add a few more minutes to that time, right?That's a shame; not everyone has a fast enough connection to stream 4K reliably. Being able to download the movie and then watch it later would have been useful.
128GB would hold about 4-5 h.265 movies but that's not the point. ATV doesn't really store content except for apps. It's a streaming box.
That is the worst analogy I've ever heard. It doesn't even attack my point well...That's like me telling you you're not ready for a Ferrari because you live on a two lane road.![]()
Also, WTF does your internet speed have to do with being "ready" for 4k? Ludicrous. One thing has nothing to do with the other.
You still don't get it. Updating the App won't add the ability to stream 4K VP9 content from YouTube. Google would have to encode all of their existing VP9 content stored on their servers to another format that the Apple TV supports. They are not going to do that. Google purchased the format that VP9 is based upon when they bought out On2 Technologies in 2010. Google then made VP9 royalty free so it would cost Apple nothing in licensing to implement VP9. If/when Apple adds support for VP9 you will have a reason to complain if the YouTube App does not get updated. Apple's Safari browser does not support YouTube VP9 content either; is that Google's fault as well?