Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Simple transform, linear or non-linear.
Considering, that PQ is absolute brightness coding, I don't see how this makes any difference? A mastered to 4000nits image will ask for 4knits brightness from the display, however that number appeared in the distribution channel. Whether mastered to it or scaled up afterwards.
Now, it will depend much more on the display system, whether it can fulfil that request or needs to start bending the gamma knee to fit into available brightness. Or clip, as some do.
Well, these are requirements to put a sticker on a box. If that's what you want, that's all you need. Same non-sense they did back in the day with HD and Full HD and THX Select, THX Ultra and all these stickers no one needs. The requirements for proper HDR are higher, it's just that barely any manufacturer can do it now, especially not in their cheap consumer products. As seen as they can, you will get Premium+, Super Premium, Super Premium+ and so on sticker. I'd like to do things right in the first place, if it's possible. You won't find 100% BT2020 for example, you'd be stuck at around 80% in the best case (with modified DCI Filters).
Don't you like that this time they set the standard with significant headroom in the color volume, not like the SDR standard we were crammed to since WWII times? Let us stick to the 2 going gammas - PQ and HLG - and 2020 color space as definition for HDR then. It denotes on the encoding level, that we are dealing with a new visual standard, that requires new playback chain.
Not up to date on these apps/calibrations. Seen early versions, none worked as expected. But there's always hope. We've used these type of calibrations ages ago in the medical field for monitors. Even in the $30k price range for a 22" to 24" monitor, they couldn't get it working properly.
We'll see, not long to go to be able test, if their promises hold. I hope it will go significantly smoother than current manual calibration. More along the ways we can calibrate our computer screens today.
I recently watched "normal" HDR without a processor in the chain... couldn't believe how bad it looked in comparison. I can only highly recommend a Lumagen or any other source that does some additional magic for anyone serious about video.
Please explain me the purpose of this processor? As of now, I understand it to be a similar virtualizer or post-processor, like there are hordes around - surround upmixers create 7.1.4 magic out of stereo music, DSEE HX makes HD-audio-from-MP3, virtual surround sound, virtual height channels place speakers to places where there are none etc, etc.
To me, anything physical beats virtual. Especially if one tries to recreate the "original information" that was thrown away in a compression process to begin with.
 
Last edited:
Don't you like that this time they set the standard with significant headroom in the color volume, not like the SDR standard we were crammed to since WWII times?
Sure, better than not doing it. I just don't care about their "sticker" standards. Manufacturers need to start making units that can give us what we'd actually like to have. Next in line for me is laser based projectors with RGB source. That should give a significant boost in performance.

Please explain me the purpose of this processor?
I've already mentioned some basics, for the details, please have a look at the thread on avs forum to which I linked in a previous post. Everything is explained there in great detail, there's no reason to repeat it here. You'll have to invest some time to read it though, as the thread's become somewhat large.
 
So is there any point of getting a 4k projector if most of my movies and tv shows are only in 1080p ? Thanks.
 
So is there any point of getting a 4k projector if most of my movies and tv shows are only in 1080p ? Thanks.
Sure. Even without 4k content a TV can upscale the image. The better the tv the better the upscaler and the better the image quality. 1080p on my LG OLED looks damn close to 4k. And I have seen some less than great 1080p upscaling on other 4k tv's. Just find a projector that has a great upscaler as well.
 
My budget is $1400 or less.

If I had a $1400 budget, I would prioritize brightness, contrast and black levels over more pixels. In other words, I'd get a better 1080p projector vs a budget 4K projector.

For what it's worth, I have a 100" screen I sit about 14 feet away from and at 1080p it looks very very sharp. Could 4K look a little sharper? Probably, but I'm just not convinced it would carry as much weight as better black levels would. My projector is a middle of the road Epson and the black levels are... ok but not amazing.

From following your remarks, I think you are trying to rationalize the less expensive 1080p. The reality is 4k will look better. There is plenty of content for it, more is coming out each day, and there is upscaling as well. Not to mention 'future proofing' which is just saying 'won't be obsolete next year.'

I have to disagree here. If you enjoy a 1080p image today (and there's no reason not to, provided it's a good projector, decent source material, and you have a nice dark room and hopefully a screen) then why would it become "obsolete" just because 4K projectors are getting more common. They're still quite a bit more expensive, and at ay given price point it stands to reason you can get a better 1080p projector than you can a 4K projector.
 
If I had a $1400 budget, I would prioritize brightness, contrast and black levels over more pixels. In other words, I'd get a better 1080p projector vs a budget 4K projector.

For what it's worth, I have a 100" screen I sit about 14 feet away from and at 1080p it looks very very sharp. Could 4K look a little sharper? Probably, but I'm just not convinced it would carry as much weight as better black levels would. My projector is a middle of the road Epson and the black levels are... ok but not amazing.

Thanks which Epson projector is it? model ?
 
Thanks which Epson projector is it? model ?

It's the Epson 2040. I got it a few years ago for I think around $600 on sale. It's been out for a few years now and I think has been superceded by other models. I get a ton of enjoyment from that giant movie-like image, but I'll also be happy to upgrade when I've got the $$.

Projectors are a little trickier to shop for than televisions. Resolution is the big headline feature people love to get hung up on, but also consider fan noise, image shift options and contrast when you buy. I would really argue that great image quality will be a better punch-up for your enjoyment than more pixels (unless you're loaded, in which case, you know, go nuts). Wirecutter has a very useful guide you might want to check out.
 
It's the Epson 2040. I got it a few years ago for I think around $600 on sale. I get a lot of enjoyment from it but I'll also be happy to upgrade when I've got the $$.

Projectors are a little trickier to shop for than televisions. Resolution is the big headline feature people love to get hung up on, but also consider fan noise, image shift options and contrast when you buy. I would really argue that great image quality will be a better punch-up for your enjoyment than more pixels (unless you're loaded, in which case, you know, go nuts). Wirecutter has a very useful guide you might want to check out.

Thanks.

I just bought a BenQ HT3550 lets see if it impresses me!

It is more mid range 4k projector than low range from what I am reading. I could be wrong though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
Thanks.

I just bought a BenQ HT3550 lets see if it impresses me!

It is more mid range 4k projector than low range from what I am reading. I could be wrong though.
Nice! If this is your first projector you're really in for a treat. I would have a hard time going back to a plain old TV at this point.
 
Nice! If this is your first projector you're really in for a treat. I would have a hard time going back to a plain old TV at this point.

It is my second projector but my other one is at least 5 years old if not older.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
Should be here Wednesday sense I get free 1 day shipping with Amazon Prime!
 
Interesting -- it's a short-throw projector. So I guess you're mounting it close to the screen? We have ours about 10 feet back, mounted to the ceiling. The mount and cabling were annoying to install but now that it's all set up we don't have to think about it at all.

Damn it. I shouldn't have started reading those Amazon reviews, because now I'm trying to rationalize blowing $1500 on a new projector...
 
I just got my projector setup and now wondering about a screen.

Tell me if this is a good idea or bad?

I could order just the screen material and make my own screen! The problem is it would need to be lightweight. Less than 4 lb. Mainly because I would want to hang it up on the wall maybe upside down big maybe. Depending on where the black part is for the no screen is. Then use command strips to connect it to the wall without holes.

Then when I don't want it out roll it up like a big tube all the way to my ceiling in the media room. Then when I need it roll it back down.

The problem is what is the best projector screen material to buy ?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.