Cant tell the difference. Certainly not worth paying extra for unless you need to shoot in 4K for your profession. Which is not many people.
How is this possible?
The 6s looks like it´s being used during an earthquake
Cant tell the difference. Certainly not worth paying extra for unless you need to shoot in 4K for your profession. Which is not many people.
Exactly! The nerd's version of it.Haha it's like that dress photo ^_^
I had many Android phones, because the frustration often leads you to buy a new one from a different manufacturer thinking it will be better. The security flaws with Android are such common place, it doesn't even make news anymore. Remember the news about a websites that can brick Android phones just by visiting them? Or everything ever written by Samsung keyboards being vulnerable to interception because of a security hole? Or many other articles that never make it big because no one cares, and only Apple news generate clicks.I'm an enthusiastic user of both android and ios and both have their pros and cons. To believe one is so superior to the other is just pure nonsense, and I'd say the chance is high that you've never even tried android.
Spyware OS? Give me a break. I wonder who had the biggest security scandal ever with the icloud photos leak.
I wish Apple would try to make same specification products with just different screen sizes! 4", 4.7", 5.5"
Hate to be left out just 'cause I don't want the Plus.![]()
4K isn't like 720p, its is a big upgrade I think. But especially more so on larger TV's. But I think the biggest changes coming to TV and Video is UHD, which includes 4K as a piece, but the bigger and more significant changes are adding a wider color gamut, its a huge upgrade, bigger then 4K imo. Also other features as well like HDR video. So as a whole 4K I think is a nice upgrade, but the new UHD spec, as seen in the new blu-ray's that are coming out next year will be huge.
I assume this must apply only to 4k video? We've been recording video using iPhones for years without OIS, and I've never had an issue with the stability of the video. Just looking through a handful of my most recent videos from my iPhone 6, they look extremely steady. I'm very curious to see how or why that would suddenly change with 4k.
Last year, the iPhone 6 Plus had one camera feature the iPhone 6 did not: optical image stabilization for photos, which automatically adjusts the camera sensor to make up for any shakiness the camera may endure. With the iPhone 6s Plus, Apple has added optical image stabilization for video as well as still images. Tonight, Giga Tech has uploaded a new video that shows off the 6s Plus' optical image stabilization versus the iPhone 6s.
While the iPhone 6s doesn't have optical image stabilization, it does have digital image stabilization, which is the camera's software accounting for any shakiness. Giga Tech notes that digital image stabilization works well when the iPhone 6s is shooting in Full HD 1920x1080, but that it's not as effective when shooting in 4K, as shown in the video.
The video, which takes place in an old, abandoned airplane, offers a striking comparison of the two device's video capabilities. While the iPhone 6s footage looks fine on its own, the contrast to the smoother iPhone 6s Plus footage makes its shakiness seem more pronounced.
Article Link: 4K Video from iPhone 6S Plus Shows Striking Advantage of Optical Image Stabilization
In the 6S Plus, and in any other device, Optical Image Stabilization requires a significantly more complicated mechanical system and will *always* be bigger than a camera lens system that only uses digital image stabilization.I doubt 6S+ camera with OIS takes up much more space than the camera on the 6S. I hate the fact fact that I am making a compromise buying the 6S now. Honestly I would pay $100 more for this on the regular 6S. This is total BS in my opinion to get people to spend $100 more. I'm already paying $200 for 128GBs, why am I getting an inferior product? I cannot walk comfortably with an iPhone 6S+ in my pocket, belt holsters make an ugly bulge under my shirt, so how else am I suppose to carry it (somewhat fashionably)?
First, things like a higher capacity battery and Optical Image Stabilization take meaningful space inside the case, so probably can't fit in the smaller phones (yet, anyway).So this is a +$100 feature all by itself? Come on. Have all same year updates have the same feature set despite screen size. Pay for screen size. Heck, have a +$100 double battery feature on all models which, since the cost basis is negligible, have far higher margins.
Margins for features users NEED, good, right?
P.S. Get a camera tripod for 4K.
Rocketman
I don't have any special info from Apple, but I guarantee that the OIS is used at all video resolutions. OIS is a mechanical system that is driven by image data. "4K (actually Quad HD - 3840x2160) will be better than HD (1920x1080).According to Apple's spec page there is no cinematic stabilization (digital stabilization) for 4K video. I would imagine 12 megapixels isn't big enough for it.
I don't have any special info from Apple, but I guarantee that the OIS is used at all video resolutions. OIS is a mechanical system that is driven by image data. "4K (actually Quad HD - 3840x2160) will be better than HD (1920x1080).
I don't have numbers, but, it shouldn't be an issue for 128GB models. For 16 GB, you wouldn't have much. 64GB should give you plenty of room, if it isn't filled up with other stuff.What about HD vs HD? Cant see myself shooting 4k very often due to all the memory it would eat up.
I've seen the settings page on the approximate storage of each HD resolution for one minute of video and it's around 380 MB/minute.
I don't have any special info from Apple, but I guarantee that the OIS is used at all video resolutions. OIS is a mechanical system that is driven by image data. "4K (actually Quad HD - 3840x2160) will be better than HD (1920x1080).
It most definitely is, just not at the 4K resolution.i could of sworn this was the already standard on iPhone 6 Plus?
It most definitely is, just not at the 4K resolution.
Yup we can! It is a silver phone and the camera that shot the pic white balanced for the gold phone in the foreground. Turned it blue.Can we talk about that blue iPhone in the video's thumbnail???
Wow! Photography is crazy.Yup we can! It is a silver phone and the camera that shot the pic white balanced for the gold phone in the foreground. Turned it blue.![]()
Funny thing is when the iPhone 6 and 6+ first came out last year all the tech reviewers did video side by sides to show how OIS made the video smoother.
Now we find out OIS never worked on Video until the 6S+
Last year, the iPhone 6 Plus had one camera feature the iPhone 6 did not: optical image stabilization for photos, which automatically adjusts the camera sensor to make up for any shakiness the camera may endure. With the iPhone 6s Plus, Apple has added optical image stabilization for video as well as still images. Tonight, Giga Tech has uploaded a new video that shows off the 6s Plus' optical image stabilization versus the iPhone 6s.
While the iPhone 6s doesn't have optical image stabilization, it does have digital image stabilization, which is the camera's software accounting for any shakiness. Giga Tech notes that digital image stabilization works well when the iPhone 6s is shooting in Full HD 1920x1080, but that it's not as effective when shooting in 4K, as shown in the video.
The video, which takes place in an old, abandoned airplane, offers a striking comparison of the two device's video capabilities. While the iPhone 6s footage looks fine on its own, the contrast to the smoother iPhone 6s Plus footage makes its shakiness seem more pronounced.
Article Link: 4K Video from iPhone 6S Plus Shows Striking Advantage of Optical Image Stabilization
Do be so quick to dismiss this. Just you wait.At 128Gb, you should have plenty of minutes if that is all you are doing. I really don't expect people to try to shoot a feature film with their Rose Gold 6S Plus.