virividox said:yeah i second that!!!
powermac666 said:Personally, I think Apple ought to do exactly what I suggest, at all times. They wouldn't even have to pay me. I'd make plenty off the bribes you lot would slide my way to make those recommendations! 😱 😀
bobringer said:Surely you jest...
That's the funniest thing I've heard all month! 92% of the HD based player market... sure looks like they are losing ground quick!
Going to 6GB would make them competitive? Uh, with what? The other 8% of the market that they don't already own... 8% of the market that bought some piece of crap because they hate Apple so much.
Ha ha ha. We're really falling behind... I can't believe we don't have at least 96% of the market.
dontmatter said:one measly gigabyte? Hasn't the mini been out for a bit too long for an increase that puny? Maybe if it gets smaller, or cheaper, or both.... otherwise, it comes no where near the pace of the updates to the other ipod line.
desdomg said:Apple do not own 92 of the HD based player market globally, just in the USA. The market is bigger than the USA, much bigger. In the global market the iPod does not even account for the majority of MP3 players sold. Apple marketing is good, very good, but at the end of the day they are just hyping the figures that favour them (like USA HD and MP3 player stats) and ignoring those that dont (global stats.)
sinisterdesign said:i'll admit that 1GB isn't a huge bump, but it IS a 25% increase. and not like there's huge pressure to get too crazy right now. they're still selling like mad w/ the same size HD and easter egg colors they've had for, what, a year or so now? 6GB would open up the low end for the iPod micro, though.
c'mon apple, how had is it to throw out some new colors? i mean, really. those 5 are tired. orange, purple, yellow, navy, matte black, white, stripes, BLUE DALMATION, anything!
Funny, I bought an iPod Photo last week -_-m a y a said:Maybe Over Achiever just purchased his brand new Dull Pocket DJ. 😉 🙂 Thus Apple is loosing ground. :: sarcastic ::
powermac666 said:Which is exactly why I think Apple ought to do THIS!
powermac666 said:Which is exactly why I think Apple ought to do THIS!
Over Achiever said:Funny, I bought an iPod Photo last week -_-
I said the MINI market, the micro-drive market, they can still lose ground there.
Remind me why I don't post here often anymore ... oh that's right. EVERYONE IS SO RIGHTEOUS!
Gah ...
m a y a said:YEAH, one extra Gig. 😱 🙄
Drop the price to 200 USD and also add the extra gig that will be nice. Though I have no use for it really I would need 4 minis to match my collection. 🙂
wrldwzrd89 said:The iPod mini is so out of my league, it's funny. With my entire collection in Apple Lossless format, it will fit only on the 60 GB iPod Photo, which I don't own.
I would do that if I used my iPod more AND I wasn't waiting for HE-AAC support in iTunes. HE-AAC is so good that any savings I get with AAC at a particular quality I can get in HALF the space and HALF the bitrate in HE-AAC. Let's say my library is 55 GB right now (which is an overestimate). Then let's say I get 16:1 compression with AAC vs. 2:1 with Apple Lossless. That would make my AAC library 13.75 GB. The equivalent HE-AAC library, at 32:1 compression, would be 6.88 GB - small enough for 2 iPod minis.smharmon said:Do what I did, convert all your music to AAC (this doesn't erase the lossless encoded material), put it into identical playlists like "U2" for lossless and "U2 mini" or add something else to designate it (I chose "m" for mobile). Then tell your ipod preferences to only sync those with the "m" or "mini" ending. You won't be able to tell the difference with apple's headphones anyway.
swissmann said:Pretty weak upgrade if that's all. Drop the price and that would be something.
obeygiant said:
obeygiant said:
desdomg said:Apple do not own 92 of the HD based player market globally, just in the USA. The market is bigger than the USA, much bigger. In the global market the iPod does not even account for the majority of MP3 players sold. Apple marketing is good, very good, but at the end of the day they are just hyping the figures that favour them (like USA HD and MP3 player stats) and ignoring those that dont (global stats.)
obeygiant said:
wrldwzrd89 said:I would do that if I used my iPod more AND I wasn't waiting for HE-AAC support in iTunes. HE-AAC is so good that any savings I get with AAC at a particular quality I can get in HALF the space and HALF the bitrate in HE-AAC. Let's say my library is 55 GB right now (which is an overestimate). Then let's say I get 16:1 compression with AAC vs. 2:1 with Apple Lossless. That would make my AAC library 13.75 GB. The equivalent HE-AAC library, at 32:1 compression, would be 6.88 GB - small enough for 2 iPod minis.