Not in my experience. Never a blip of overheating.
When anyone says “I’ve heard….’, ignore the comment.
How do you know if your AppleTV is throttling or not?
Not in my experience. Never a blip of overheating.
When anyone says “I’ve heard….’, ignore the comment.
I’m sure, like me, he sees no difference in his Apple TV’s response or performance. Even if there is some minute throttling, it doesn’t matter if you notice no difference in response or performance. A difference that makes no difference is no difference.How do you know if your AppleTV is throttling or not?
I do own the current Apple TV by the way, the only reason I can't compare is because I didn't have the previous models. I just don't see why someone would say anything about heat performance unless it actually affected their usage.Not in my experience. Never a blip of overheating.
When anyone says “I’ve heard….’, ignore the comment.
Shrinking the mac mini to look like an Apple TV has one motive behind it: make it cheaper to build.
It does, but I couldn't find anything else that was similar for what I needed.$54 seems a little high though
So instead they should keep it the same size with all that wasted space for the imaginary optical drive? The current Mac Mini is absurdly large and outdated. The AppleTV size would be amazing. Seems like some people have never have heard of cable ties. If a small size is a deterrent, it might be best to stick to a 2009 Mac Pro cheesegrater so it can't fall off your desk when fumbling around with cables.ugh, my thoughts exactly, imagine it's 'so gorgeously small and light' and moves around every time you plug something in or out. That would be absolutely terrible, would boil my piss that.
Majes me think of the Asus Vivostick…2030:
MacMini in usb c dongle, just connect to your display.
Well I was looking at the two earlier in the year and glad I didn't make the jump. Pricing out relatively higher spec Mac mini M2 Pro and a base level Mac Studio, I discovered that a M2 Max studio was a better value than a M2 Pro similarly upgraded. I have attached two screen shots. For the same price, the Studio is a much better value. More GPU cores, supports more monitors, more ports, active cooling and more encoders. The screen shots were taken today.No, because the gap between the mini and the Studio is too large.
The Mac mini M2 Pro was a decent step towards something in-between entry-level and mid/high-end.
Apple is infamous for making the low-end and mid-tier products too low value and performance that those who just need a little more than budget/mid-tier are forced to go "Pro" even if their needs are not "Pro" but just more than budget/mid-tier.
Yes, that's Apple's business model, forcing the consumer up the value/$ ladder and offering peanuts for anyone who can't/won't pay up.
But the need for something between the Studio and mini is there, regardless of whether one doesn't want to or cannot pay for a Mac Studio or Mac Pro.
Well I was looking at the two earlier in the year and glad I didn't make the jump. Pricing out relatively higher spec Mac mini M2 Pro and a base level Mac Studio, I discovered that a M2 Max studio was a better value than a M2 Pro similarly upgraded. I have attached two screen shots. For the same price, the Studio is a much better value. More GPU cores, supports more monitors, more ports, active cooling and more encoders. The screen shots were taken today.
True, but they were the same price though. Unless you wanted the smaller form factor, it would make sense to pay the same price for more features, no? I would definitely agree with you if there was a slight price difference as in the Mac Studio being more expensive than the Mini Pro.Yep - Apple has done a masterful job at creating all the spec upgrades to carefully nudge you higher and higher up the product and price tiers
I have a very specific use-case for a Mac, so depending on graphics performance in one very specific application, if it isn't great, then I'll probably get a top spec Mini, because while it has fewer GPU and CPU cores than the base Studio, it saves me $200 in absolute cost.True, but they were the same price though. Unless you wanted the smaller form factor, it would make sense to pay the same price for more features, no? I would definitely agree with you if there was a slight price difference as in the Mac Studio being more expensive than the Mini Pro.
Don't be shocked if it's been removed. Most headphones and earphones sold today have gone wireless, that's the trend.I hate to ask, but will there be a headphone jack?
Well my wired Logitech speakers on my current iMac are going to recycling I guess...Don't be shocked if it's been removed. Most headphones and earphones sold today have gone wireless, that's the trend.
Yeah. More devices that need to be charged. Ugh.Don't be shocked if it's been removed. Most headphones and earphones sold today have gone wireless, that's the trend.
Yes, but it will be USB-A.I hate to ask, but will there be a headphone jack?
Don't forget 10Gb Ethernet on the Studio vs 1Gb on the Mini. A lot of people gloss over this, but project out the current pace of bandwidth needs for another 2-5 years (and I know a lot of people who've kept their Mini far longer than that) and this starts to become a meaningful difference. Of course, Apple will let you upgrade the current mini to 10Gb...for another $100Well I was looking at the two earlier in the year and glad I didn't make the jump. Pricing out relatively higher spec Mac mini M2 Pro and a base level Mac Studio, I discovered that a M2 Max studio was a better value than a M2 Pro similarly upgraded. I have attached two screen shots. For the same price, the Studio is a much better value. More GPU cores, supports more monitors, more ports, active cooling and more encoders. The screen shots were taken today.
That particular situation seemed like a screw up by AppleTrue, but they were the same price though. Unless you wanted the smaller form factor, it would make sense to pay the same price for more features, no? I would definitely agree with you if there was a slight price difference as in the Mac Studio being more expensive than the Mini Pro.
There's a dongle for that!Well my wired Logitech speakers on my current iMac are going to recycling I guess...
OP was correct, sure there are cases for "micro" sized computing decides, but if it comes at the cost of throttling, something we've learned to live without since the release of the M-series chips (SoCs) then the size reduction will have been at a cost many mini buyers are unwilling to pay.Sounds like what you need is a Mac Studio, and not a Mini. There are absolutely use cases for micro computers, and just because yours doesn't seem to be one, doesn't me "we" don't need it.
oh so they're gonna hobble the Mac Mini Pro to improve the market segmentation of the Studio? Amazing, how very Tim Cook.Current case was designed to house a SuperDrive… I’m curious what new form factor might be introduced. Mac Studio automatically gets a more clearly defined place in the lineup.