Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm having such a difficult time finding a good monitor for my wife for the photo editing she does. She's not a super professional photographer (70/30 hobby to clients), but she does enough that she spends several hours a week editing in Lightroom etc on her 13" Macbook Pro. I'd love to get her a larger 4K monitor for her to work on, but most I've seen at stores are matte or just look...meh... If I research it online I get like $1000 "pro" type monitors, which have that crisp glossy look of the iMacs. Can anyone recommend a monitor for $500 max that isn't that ugly matte look?

I usually read that Matt displays are better for photo editors - https://au.pcmag.com/monitors/3667/how-to-choose-the-right-monitor-for-photo-editing
 
Does anyone know WHY high resolution displays haven't caught on as much in the Windows world? It's a bit absurd; here we are nearly a decade after the first retina Macs came out, and Windows STILL doesn't look as good on a high-DPI display as MacOS does.

What's the hold up? Don't Windows users WANT to have these gorgeous displays? Why can't MS get things right?

The hold up is that in Microsoft's obsolete view of things, you don't need high-res for MS Office. And why would you - in a world where everyone is a cubicle office worker, or a dry corporate douche looking at Excel sheets 24/7.
Flat flippy tiles is as far as Microsoft's perception of aesthetics goes. Go figure.
As the most used OS world-wide, and only consumer OS alternative to MacOS, why bother make things better?
[doublepost=1557392786][/doublepost]
I'm having such a difficult time finding a good monitor for my wife for the photo editing she does. She's not a super professional photographer (70/30 hobby to clients), but she does enough that she spends several hours a week editing in Lightroom etc on her 13" Macbook Pro. I'd love to get her a larger 4K monitor for her to work on, but most I've seen at stores are matte or just look...meh... If I research it online I get like $1000 "pro" type monitors, which have that crisp glossy look of the iMacs. Can anyone recommend a monitor for $500 max that isn't that ugly matte look?

Dell U3014 / U3017.
16:10 aspect ratio is your friend for photography. Avoid wide screens!
 
Last edited:
I really hope the upcoming monitor(s) and Mac Pro signal a real turnaround in Apple's treatment of its 'high end' users. Irrespective of what you think of Tim Cook as a person or CEO, he's been the death knell for professional creatives outside of laptops. Maybe he's on kickbacks from Dell and HP on the sly...
 
Which is exactly what the article says...

False. The article never mentions anything of the sort like I did about the displays possibly shipping during WWDC or even later this summer.

Hence:

My guess is Apple is no longer restocking them, which might be indicative that they’re finally bringing their own displays in either during WWDC or maybe later in the summer. Ideally, it would make sense during WWDC being within less than a month. (They surprised everyone with Macs updated last July.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: afir93
Does anyone know WHY high resolution displays haven't caught on as much in the Windows world?

I think 4k has caught on OK - it’s 5k that has foundered.

TLDNR: because of the way the OSs and Apps are designed, 4K is the sweet spot for Windows and 5k is the sweet spot (at a price) for MacOS.

1080p had become the de-facto standard for “low” def displays in Windows - it’s the same resolution as HD TV meaning cheap, mass market display panels - so the obvious next step up is 4K “UHD” at exactly twice the linear resolution so everything scales well.

Apple had pushed 1440p to their less price-sensitive customers in the form of the iMac and Cinema displays, so the best step-up to that is 5k, again, at exactly twice the resolution.

Thing is, although 5k is better, 4K is pretty darned good and, on Windows, it doesn’t need non-integer scaling to get a usable size on a 27” display. On Mac, everything is a bit too big in standard “retina mode” 4K, although the non-integer scaled modes are very effective.
 
I wish Apple had not stopped making their own displays, so the idea that they might start up again is encouraging.

The 4K and 5K displays in the iMacs are absolutely the best displays I've ever seen; I'd love for Apple to just repackage those exact same panels in their own displays matching the iMacs so you can have a two or three (or more!) display iMac setup where everything matches and looks great.

Also, the LG 5K display wasn't the most reliable thing around. We have four of them at work and two of them have failed since we got them. They were replaced under warranty, but damn... a 50% failure rate on a premium product? That's just sad.

My college has the LG 4K display here opposite me. Has been working well for about six months now and it easily has the best image I've seen on a monitor. In conjunction with True Tone (which works when the MacBook Pro display/lid is open) the colors look good an natural, albeit I bet they would be even better if a proper hardware calibration was done.
 
Fingers crossed for iMac-like 4K/5K monitors with amazing build quality.

I don't see any reason to release just a super-expensive 6K monitor for the 1% of their customers.
 
These displays suck.
I have the 4K and 5K. It's the same panel as the iMacs and my 5K LG sits right next to my 5K iMac. I cannot tell the difference between the screens. They also have USB C hubs on the back.

These are fantastic displays. Is the design pretty? Not really, but the screens ARE and that's the important thing.

I don't understand all the hate for these monitors. If youkke the iMac screena, you'll like the LG'S
 
  • Like
Reactions: smirking and rawweb
My question: will the new 6k show enough colors to make the recent game of thrones episode watchable?

Seriously though, I have been watching the Apple product monitor space for some time. I run the Dell P2715Q off a Blackmagic 580 and the 2018 MBA.

I tried an ultra wide curved display and returned it because the PPI was too low.

I’m very curious to see what Apple has planned and how well it will support existing machines Andy eGPUs.
 
I reckon the LG 5K is gonna be available again, otherwise Apple would have removed the listing as well. They should have done this with the iPhone SE, givin' how many times it was on 'clearance sale'
 
  • Like
Reactions: smirking
Apple’s got a lot of experience with high quality, high resolution displays, I don’t think there’s much to worry about!
Well technically their high res displays were LG or Phillips and just assembled by Apple in a bespoke shell... but they did assemble them very nicely indeed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smirking
Does anyone know WHY high resolution displays haven't caught on as much in the Windows world? It's a bit absurd; here we are nearly a decade after the first retina Macs came out, and Windows STILL doesn't look as good on a high-DPI display as MacOS does.

What's the hold up? Don't Windows users WANT to have these gorgeous displays? Why can't MS get things right?

Half the reason I love my 5K iMac is because of that display. You'd think our Windows-using friends would want such goodness too.

VGA interfaces? :)
 
Apple already confirmed that they are working on a pro display alongside the Mac Pro, both are a 2019 thing according to Apple. Mark Gurman from Bloomberg has said that Apple is contemplating announcements for the Mac Pro at WWDC.
 
Well technically their high res displays were LG or Phillips and just assembled by Apple in a bespoke shell... but they did assemble them very nicely indeed.
Nope not true in the least, technically or otherwise. There’s a big difference between an LCD panel and a monitor.

Also, Apple doesn’t actually do the assembly; that’s outsourced to contract manufacturers.
 
I hope iPhone sales crash and burn, leaving Apple with nowhere to go after ignoring their Mac lineup for years. Apple's put all of their fruit into two baskets: iPhone and services. I, for one, want neither.
 
Both of these come up refurbished on Amazon and Woot often, very cheap. I got the 4k for 200 bucks as I await the coming Apple displays. It has a beautiful display in a not-so-premium frame. But at least it's flat black and basically unnoticeable in every day use.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.