The home button is the screen. It's clickable. You heard it here first!I heard they have a 1" going. It will be the same resolution as the current iPad and will have 50x the battery life, but oesn't have a home button.
The home button is the screen. It's clickable. You heard it here first!I heard they have a 1" going. It will be the same resolution as the current iPad and will have 50x the battery life, but oesn't have a home button.
I agree. I have very high level of doubt this will ever happen.Steve was pretty adamant about a smaller iPad not working. And I know he's denied things before only to have them released a few months later, but this wasn't a simple denial. He went into pretty lengthy detail explaining exactly the reasons why it was fundamentally a bad idea.
I'm so sick of hearing "Steve said", can't anyone think for themselves?Didn't Steve Jobs made it clear that he doesn't want an ipad smaller than it is?
I heard they have a 1" going. It will be the same resolution as the current iPad and will have 50x the battery life, but it doesn't have a home button.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F5166b Safari/6533.18.5)
Total RUBISH, just like the iPhone nano - this is not news and not certified rumors - just plain rubbish gossip
Thing is, up to point, what "Steve says" is usually what Apple does.
Given recent events I suspect some things Steve would not agree with may start to happen.
I agree Apple isn`t Steve Jobs, but he has an undeniable effect on the whole company.
He was also right when he told everyone they didn't need 3G on the first iPhone and then came out the next year with it. Think for yourself !!!!Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148a Safari/6533.18.5)
I don't see myself buying a 6 inches iPad. Especially after seeing Samsung Galaxy. Too small. Steve is right as usual!
Fubar1977 said:Really can`t see this, Apple have already quite publicly said that they don`t see a point to a small (7") tablet.
I remain to be convinced about them myself, just feels like an oversized phone.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
.....and nobody wants a video iPod
.....and we don't know how to make a 500$ computer that is not junk
ACE is famous for saying one thing and doing another
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_6 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8E200 Safari/6533.18.5)
6 is just an obscure size, dosent apple follow a set of size ratios what would the one down from 9.4 be . Think thed want a size that runs apps without changing for developers.
He was also right when he told everyone they didn't need 3G on the first iPhone and then came out the next year with it. Think for yourself !!!!![]()
The current iPad is proof that you can run apps from a smaller device (iPhone) on a larger screen (iPad). So there is nothing stopping Apple from releasing a 6" iOS device and running apps at iPhone resolution (with enlarged controls).
Smaller is what is tough, because the on screen control buttons get too small.
The home button is the screen. It's clickable. You heard it here first!
it's a slightly larger iPod Touch to be sold alongside the existing size mostly as a gaming and pocket reader device.