Because nobody have built one.Why is there not a separate 64 bit version of Firefox for use on Leopard?
thats one of the reasons why 95% of firefox 3 is now in cocoaI saw this on a google search for "64-bit firefox mac". From other results, it appears that Firefox for Mac uses some Carbon, which cannot run in 64-bit Mac applications. Until they eliminate all bits of Carbon and replace them with Cocoa, a 64-bit version is sadly impossible.
.
But seriously, what would you want to get from a 64-bit firefox on mac that you can't get from a 32-bit? Faster speed for playing a few dozen online games? That's probably one of the major reasons why some people would want to amp up their browser. Other than that, 32-bit would be just fine.
But seriously, what would you want to get from a 64-bit firefox on mac that you can't get from a 32-bit? Faster speed for playing a few dozen online games? That's probably one of the major reasons why some people would want to amp up their browser. Other than that, 32-bit would be just fine.
Yes.As I said earlier, the issue isn't speed. It's compatibility. The latest release of Java is 1.6 and can only run in 64-bit browsers. So if there is something online that requires Java 1.6, which there is, I have to run it in Safari.
Yes.
Apple took the odd Decision of making Java 64-bit, they should step up and make Safari 64-bit.
Well, the odd thing with that is that Safari seems to be 64-bit... at least as far as java is concerned....
It won't make a damn difference.
64 bit has really gotten to people.
All 64 bit offers is the ability to access more memory and be able to do intense computational work in a shorter amount of time.
I realize this is an old thread, but I am sick of hearing that 64-bit only advantage is more memory. A complete false.
One of the biggest advantages to 64bit is the doubling of the general purpose registers and floating point registers.
x86 had 8 GP registers (eax,ebx,ecx,edx,ebp,esp,esi,edi). x86_64 has 16 (rax,rbx,rcx,rdx,rbp,rsp,rsi,rdi,r8,r9,r10,r11,r12,r13,r14,r15)
Similarly with the 128-bit SSE registers, increased from 8 to 16.
These alone will provide performance improvements to almost any application other than "Hello World", and especially among heavy javascript sites like gmail, etc.
I realize this is an old thread, but I am sick of hearing that 64-bit only advantage is more memory. A complete false.
Why is there not a separate 64 bit version of Firefox for use on Leopard?
And, of course, it resolves the Year 2038 Problem.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem
Development of 64-bit Firefox and plugins might get some boost through the release of Snow Leopard (which is almost upon us), since it encourages the use of 64-bit binaries by moving the core OS (and utilties) to 64-bit.
Development of 64-bit Firefox and plugins might get some boost through the release of Snow Leopard (which is almost upon us), since it encourages the use of 64-bit binaries by moving the core OS (and utilties) to 64-bit.
Look here: Bug 468509 - Gecko 64-bit Mac OS X support
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468509
They work already a long time on this and nearly every bug which would prevent a "64-bit Snow Leopard version" is already fixed.
We will see likely a 64-bit version together with the Snow Leopard release or only somewhat later.