Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7) Looking for a new daily driver to remain bone stock, wheels and all--already have a summer toy to mod. Which would you choose and why? Spending cap is around $9k, and I can get both body styles with lower miles at that price with some searching. Truthfully the '99-'04 body style never grew on me, they look so blah and pedestrian--the earlier cars looked fantastic and sporty. Interiors are the sane sans seats so they both look fine inside. The newer car has 260 hp vs. 215 in the older one, and the newer one is, well, newer. The newer one is the better deal no doubt. But when I think of a Mustang, I think of the '94-'98 body style--that was a homerun. Reliability seems roughy the same sans the plastic intake issue on the older ones. I know which one I should choose but it's just so blah looking in stock form. I know which one I want and it's a black '98 GT with the 17" split spoke wheels. Would you take the car you want or the newer, faster, better value car even if it looks stale, mileage and price the same? The older ones hold their value better. Not getting a '94-'95 5.0 because it's staying stock so the newer 4.6 is fine since power is the same, and not going into the '05+ price bracket.