Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why would Apple acquire this company? Two words: health care of an ageing population. I bet a dime against a doughnut that this has the potential to be used as a medical device as well as a consumer product.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: longpath
My wife and I have a Sleep Number bed that has a similar function built-in, but their execution is horrible. If one of the dogs jumps on the bed after we leave for work, it thinks we went back to bed. And you can't edit the sleep time to let the app know when you were really in bed for several hours (probably because they are busy data-mining what the data tells them). If this gives them an incentive to make their app better, then it is great news.
 
While the Apple Watch is still constrained by the limits of its battery, this allows a two pronged coverage of health data collection. This strikes me as a smart play; but also an admission that Apple does not expect to achieve multiple day battery life in the Apple Watch any time soon.
 
Very detailed results, which are impressive. The premise of a smart alarm is used by many other products out there as well. Including the one from my icon, which I love. But I bought it for other reasons than that.

I don't think this stuff will help beyond telling whether you are in deep sleep vs light sleep. Environmental issues preventing sleep can be corrected fairly easily, Emotional or cognitive issues won't be as easy, and those are likely to be the major reasons for causing sleep loss and restlessness.

The sensor is very sophisticated, but I haven’t seen any detailed results. It just says how long you were asleep, in essence. As far as I can tell, the software only gives you totals, which makes it ... well, useless for my own diagnostic purposes. I am sure Apple can do a lot with it, since Beddit itself doesn’t.
[doublepost=1494505365][/doublepost]
You'll probably have to use with the charger attached. No doubt Apple will find a dongle that one can shove up ones backside to handle this.

If you mean the sleep gizmo, there’s no battery. I wish it connected to the phone via cable, rather than bluetooth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vanilla35
While the Apple Watch is still constrained by the limits of its battery, this allows a two pronged coverage of health data collection. This strikes me as a smart play; but also an admission that Apple does not expect to achieve multiple day battery life in the Apple Watch any time soon.

Yes, because people literally cannot find an hour at home to charge their watch prior to going to bed.
 
For people with ES (Electric Sensitivity) they will probably have trouble sleeping wearing the watch.
Is... is that a real thing, or is it like "gluten sensitivity"?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/b...en-sensitivity-is-probably-just-in-your-head/
http://www.sciencealert.com/scienti...n-sensitivity-have-now-shown-it-doesn-t-exist
http://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(13)00702-6/abstract
The readout will also be affected by the fact that having wi-fi and EMFs next to you while sleeping is bad in the first place
Well, you're surrounded by Wi-Fi, radio waves, radiation, satellite transmissions, people using microwaves, computer screens, electrical devices and lots of other stuffs all day every day, so worrying about it when you're sleeping is extraordinarily specific.
 
Last edited:
Apple is about to do it again!!!

...and by "it" I mean solve a problem that no one has.
By no one, I guess you mean many people with sleep disorders? Maybe it's not something everyone wants, but something many people need. Blood sugar monitoring isn't used by everyone, or even a large percentage of people, but for those that do monitor their blood sugar, HealthKit integration is a huge step forward.
[doublepost=1494507444][/doublepost]
What is the point of having all these features when watch can not run with charging for more than 12 hrs
what does this have to do with the watch?
 
Yes, because people literally cannot find an hour at home to charge their watch prior to going to bed.

Those who claim the battery lasts all day must barely use the watch itself. I played with it loads over a period of 2 weeks before I put mine in a drawer.

The battery would last about 6-8 hours, tops. Even my mechanical watch will give me 40 hours on a wind up ;)

I just couldn't be arsed with another item to charge. Another charger and cable to carry with me.....
 
Those who claim the battery lasts all day must barely use the watch itself. I played with it loads over a period of 2 weeks before I put mine in a drawer.

The battery would last about 6-8 hours, tops. Even my mechanical watch will give me 40 hours on a wind up ;)

I just couldn't be arsed with another item to charge. Another charger and cable to carry with me.....

I don't know what's your definition of "use". I leave the house with my Apple Watch fully charged at 6 am and it consistently ends the day at ~60-70% battery life. Throughout the day, I am interacting with notifications, apps, making payments with Apple Pay etc. I could probably make it through two days in between days but I don't see the need to.
 
Apple is about to do it again!!!

...and by "it" I mean solve a problem that no one has.

Buying this kit is a very low entry to a sleep study, and could supplement, or provide preliminary data to support getting a full blown sleep study.

It could be a health care cost saving measure if refined/validated further.

While some populations won't see the benefit from this development, as obesity continues to rise, so will those patients who will view this technology as a life saver.

It goes without saying that this technology won't solve a problem, but rather bring attention to data that currently isn't being tracked, and help supplement/provide some insight into a domain thats not been extensively explored.

It's worth noting - You can't manage what you don't measure. And if you can't measure it, you can't improve/fix it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sxc7890
I didn't think I had a problem with sleep although the symptoms of poor sleep were there. I was just used to waking up tired and groggy until I had my shower and coffee and accepted that that's how I was in the morning.

Then I got a Withings Aura just because I like gadgets and needed a new alarm clock. The smart alarm function was life changing for me. My alarm stopped waking me up in the middle of R.E.M. and I stopped worrying that I'd miss my alarm because I'd be in such deep sleep that I wouldn't hear it or slam the snooze button in my sleep. I now awake gradually after my final R.E.M. cycle and feel like I got a good night's rest without that sense that I missed out on sleep.

Aura also introduced me to the concept of 20 minute naps. It's my favourite feature. If I'm tired through the day, I lay down for a quick catnap, the Aura's sounds and light luls me to sleep and wakes me up gradually as I approach the 20 minutes. I wake up refreshed and ready to pick up on my day.

While I'm happy with my Aura, it feels neglected by Withings in terms of app updates and integration into my other smart home devices, including HomeKit.

Apple buying Beddit really got my attention. I'd love to have the functions of Aura but with Siri controls, iOS' own alarm clock, HomeKit support and native HealthKit integration. I could likely replicate all of Aura's functions using my own bedroom Phillips Hue HomeKit lights.

I'll await to see what Nokia does now that they own Withings but I may soon put it for sale if Apple makes the right moves itself.


Have you tried Apple's "Bedtime" function? It does some of what you describe already and has fantastic gradual wake up alarms.
 
Apple Watch is far too big to wear at night. Also, when would we find 2 hours to charge it without losing out on the activity monitoring.
 
Then thank god it doesn't actually exist.

Is... is that a real thing, or is it like "gluten sensitivity"?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/b...en-sensitivity-is-probably-just-in-your-head/
http://www.sciencealert.com/scienti...n-sensitivity-have-now-shown-it-doesn-t-exist
http://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(13)00702-6/abstract

Well, you're surrounded by Wi-Fi, radio waves, radiation, satellite transmissions, people using microwaves, computer screens, electrical devices and lots of other stuffs all day every day, so worrying about it when you're sleeping is extraordinarily specific.

Giving it an initialism doesn't make it any more real.



No.

I expected some ignorant replies, not going to justify responding to them
 
Have you tried Apple's "Bedtime" function? It does some of what you describe already and has fantastic gradual wake up alarms.

The Bedtime function can't do what these dedicated devices do because it has no idea what state of sleep you're in.

The key part is your alarm knowing when you're just finished a R.E.M. Cycle and then gradually start waking you up before you go into another cycle. It knows this because it measures your heart rate, breathing and movements through the night and determines your very personal pattern.

It's being awoken while inside of a R.E.M. Cycle that creates that startled, groggy and tired sensation. With regular alarms, it's a gamble because they don't know when you're in R.E.M. That's why sometimes you wake up perfectly refreshed — you got lucky and your alarm time hit the sweet spot — and other times you feel tired and groggy or wake up startled because you were awoken from deep sleep.

As I said in my first post, I didn't know what a good nights rest and waking up refreshed was like until I started using a Withings Aura. I'm very much looking forward to Apple's implantation with the Beddit acquisition.
 
Last edited:
Every Siri search is therefore "creepy" in your eyes. Does Apple have a search engine? No they don't. They partner with Microsoft and use their Bing search engine. Everything that goes through Siri is data-mined by Microsoft, now do you think these results aren't shared between Microsoft and Apple? Please, it's in the T&Cs but hey at least Apple can say say they're not doing it directly.

I don't see how that's a problem as long as the data that MS gets can't be identified as your data. Siri doesn't build user profiles and Apple uses differential privacy (which is mathematically proven to be unidentifiable), effectively completely scrambling and anonymizing the data before it is analyzed/sent somewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sxc7890
For people with ES (Electric Sensitivity) they will probably have trouble sleeping wearing the watch.
The readout will also be affected by the fact that having wi-fi and EMFs next to you while sleeping is bad in the first place
Tin foil hats to the ready! I think they'd be more worried about rolling out of the side of the bed and falling over the edge or the planet.
 
Apple is about to do it again!!!

...and by "it" I mean solve a problem that no one has.
Perhaps you don't have sleep problems but I do. I suffer from sleep apnea. Sleep apnea is a potentially serious sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts. If collecting my sleeping data could help in some research then I am all for it. And let's hope the purchase of those sensors will lead to another miniaturized version of the sensor installed in an Apple Watch which could monitor my breathing while I sleep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cigsm and sxc7890
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.