1. Why should people force to have to have multiple computers as backup hardware(even if they do use it for work / business)?
It isn't
people that force this. It's unforeseen events that make this a good idea... like a hard drive or SSD unexpectedly failing. If you have a way of life or livelihood that depends on a single point of failure, the best way to ensure your livelihood is preserved is to mitigate that single point of failure.
This is like asking "why should I have insurance on my car/home/health?" or "why should I back up my data?" Because if you lose those things, crying about how unfair it is to a forum isn't going to bring those things back, or make your situation any better. Nor is insulting everyone who calls you on your lack of planning.
I understand the need for data backup and offsite/cloud backup storage and restore, but expecting people to always have backup computers for manufacture defects is unreasonable.
There are many more reasons than manufacturing defects to have backup hardware. Theft, natural disaster, accidental damage... you know, the same reasons one backs up their data.
2. I don't think what the OP asking for is unfair. An ETA on repair is not asking for too much, and i think the car analogy is apt in this situation.
I can certainly agree on this, but when the vendor (in this case, Apple) must depend on another parts supplier who isn't giving them an answer, there's not a whole lot that can be done here. Would you rather they lie to the OP?
3. While customer demanding for a replacement is usually un-warrented for simple recall/services; but at some point past a reasonable waiting period for repair, the customer should have the right to asking for it.
He asked, and his question was answered. If he doesn't like the answer, then he should perhaps vote with his wallet and switch platforms.
After all would you be ok if Apple keep your computer for 2+ month for repair and not give an ETA for service.
It has not been 2+ months.
I like many people at this forum like Apple products and are generally satisfied with their CS. But sometime they do fall short, and it is not unreasonable for us to voice our opinions about it when it does happen.
It's certainly not unreasonable to voice your opinion. But, when the same person:
- Attacks low-level staffers' intelligence levels,
- Gets in the "I posted this on an Android" jab,
- Declares everyone who disagrees with him as either a troll, or on Apple's payroll,
Then the REAL motives have to be questioned. From post #1, this thread was intended to get a rise out of people, and the OP got
exactly what he was looking for, and has been asking for more ever since. So my sympathy isn't forthcoming.