While true, 99+% of the folks reading wouldn’t understand physical dimensions either, and the entire semiconductor industry is referring to these node names, so unless something changes there, why should articles refer to some other names or “disclose”??
Carbono chips. And carbono is the element capable to create life. Freaking.
Smaller nodes does not mean smaller chips, they will stay the same or even grow cause more functionality is offered, requiring more transistors thus little impact to overall chip size
will use either picometers or angstroms next. Angstroms sounds cooler, but picometers keeps with the metricity of it all
I’d say not as wide and taller similar to Samsung. iPhones curved or flat have been almost the same width across
It’s the likely power efficiency that will make a difference in battery life, not the size change.
Damn, I haven't thought about that. Of coure there will be additional 100 of years of improvements between 1 and 0,01nm process for Apple to carry on.
