Their 20nm "sucked" so much Apple used TSMC instead of Samsung's crap for the A8... I guess so buddy...
Nobody's ever found an A8 inside an Apple that wasn't TSMC... That's the fact bud.
Do you know what the hell you're talking about.
Considering the current mix is 50%, and they produce all A8 chips, that means TSMC is producing about 70% of Apple's chip... That's some "burn" Samsung put on them hey.
When you rant you should normally not talk about something you pulled straight from thin air.
Considering in the end its even possible the TSMC one has the best battery life and the current geekbench seem to be about exact the same (within margins of error for each chip), don't know the hell you're talking about.
You do know the snapdragon 810 has the same exact 8 core big little like the 14nm exynos 7420 right? You do know that the 810 was a complete failure because of tsmc process and ran like a molting volcano compared to the same cores on samsungs 14nm.14nm a9 is being held back to match the tdp and clocks as the 16nm version.
The exynos 7420 in the gs6 is also held back because there was no comp at the time to samsungs 14nm from anyone.
Samsung originally made the 7420 in the gs6 to run at 2.4ghz and my phone with unlocked bootloader and unlocked speed steps scores 6600 in geekbench.
The 14nm a9 can easily run 200-300mhz faster and still hit the same tod of its 16nm tsmc part.
Here is my 14nm 8 core running at 2.4ghz when snapdragon 810 with same cores thrityle at 1.6ghz
And yes tsmc at the time with its 20nm a8 sucked compared to samsungs 14nm.you do know samsung was making the same 14nm chips out now back then right?
Apple could of used 14nm for the iphone 6 and skipped 20nm