Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

According to Toms Hardware testing the Samsung is slightly better overall lol.

IphoneIssues said:
Uh oh! If you returned yours and got a TSMC, time to run it back!
Click to expand...

so if you have a Samsung chip it magically becomes better then the TSMC again like the first couple of weeks

thats how this works right? :p

what's happening next week?, should people exchange their phones in advance or what
 
smhp.gif

Oh oh the plot thickens
Time for macrumors to panic again
 
  • Like
Reactions: 88Keys, 5105973, hamiltonDSi and 11 others
i do still think the tsmc ones better, but im not getting mine till next year and im sure by then we'll know which ones better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MyMacintosh
I wish they ran the geekbench battery test too to confirm everyone else's numbers.

Assuming the geekbench battery test is still higher for the TSMC, I guess the TSMC is throttling more heavily?
 
Those who has SAMSUNG 6S, don't be excited yet..

Obviously, they omitted the Geekbench test in the report without valid reason. This can not be a good conclusion that SAMSUNG 6S is better. I would't buy the story here. Every Geekbench test point out TSMC has up to 50% power efficiency I've seen 28%, 34%, and 51% in this Macrumors forums. And also, I don't think the excuse is what Tom should say that Geekbench is not usually he did for mobile devices. This I will say a flowed test, since Tom knows the debate is about the geekbench and the battery consumption. Also, other sources around the world finds the temperature from SAMSUNG 6s is higher than the TSMC one. His shows completely different. How people would agree it is statistically meaningful?

Another article that covers APPLE's A**.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: g75d3, phillytim, hammy434 and 1 other person
Prince134 said:
Those who has SAMSUNG 6S, don't be excited yet..

Obviously, they omitted the Geekbench test in the report without valid reason. This can not be a good conclusion that SAMSUNG 6S is better. I would't buy the story here. Every Geekbench test point out TSMC has up to 50% power efficiency I've seen 28%, 34%, and 51% in this Macrumors forums. And also, I don't think the excuse is what Tom should say that Geekbench is not usually he did for mobile devices. This I will say a flowed test, since Tom knows the debate is about the geekbench and the battery consumption. Also, other sources around the world finds the temperature from SAMSUNG 6s is higher than the TSMC one. His shows completely different. How people would agree it is statically meaningful?

Another article that covers APPLE's A**.
Click to expand...

We got a salty tsmc owner here boys xD
 
  • Like
Reactions: welsea, MrXiro, bkends35 and 8 others
Prince134 said:
Those who has SAMSUNG 6S, don't be excited yet..

Obviously, they omitted the Geekbench test in the report without valid reason. This can not be a good conclusion that SAMSUNG 6S is better. I would't buy the story here. Every Geekbench test point out TSMC has up to 50% power efficiency I've seen 28%, 34%, and 51% in this Macrumors forums. And also, I don't think the excuse is what Tom should say that Geekbench is not usually he did for mobile devices. This I will say a flowed test, since Tom knows the debate is about the geekbench and the battery consumption. Also, other sources around the world finds the temperature from SAMSUNG 6s is higher than the TSMC one. His shows completely different. How people would agree it is statically meaningful?

Another article that covers APPLE's A**.
Click to expand...

at this point it's pretty clear how the geekbench battery test plays out on both phones so why run it again. what's interesting is how it is increasingly becoming an anomalous result even amongst other tests that are similar in nature. at this point I think there are enough contradictions that you can't declare anything based on that one test. several of the tests they ran seem to contradict those power efficiently claims in fact. and between anandtech and tomshardware all the other tests are very closely matched making the Geekbench battery test result the anomaly. rather then discard it I think it needs to be figured out as it's consistent, but then that same test gave the Galaxy S6 a really good score so... :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: scaredpoet
richard371 said:
Yup
Click to expand...
NO, I don't have any 6S, or 6S+. You guys jump to the conclusion too fast. :)
I am using iPhone 4 of 2010, which was using SAMSUNG of course.
Guys, points are there. Mixing other factors, it's nothing to discuss because it's masked, or canceled out.
Geekbench tells you one thing, and it's clear that TSMC chip is superior to SAMSUNG, and more users may find it later on if they use SAMSUNG 6S play games a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hammy434
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I along with Apple believe that neither had an advantage.
Prince134 said:
NO, I don't have any 6S, or 6S+. You guys jump to the conclusion too fast. :)
I am using iPhone 4 of 2010, which was using SAMSUNG of course.
Guys, points are there. Mixing other factors, it's nothing to discuss because it's masked, or canceled out.
Geekbench tells you one thing, and it's clear that TSMC chip is superior to SAMSUNG, and more users may find it later on if they use SAMSUNG 6S play games a lot.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back