Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How can you decide within 10 minutes that it’s garbage (it’s not 2019 anymore, so there’s more stuff on there now) & why wouldn’t you keep it for the 3 months to see if there’s anything you like?

I found myself watching Apple TV+ more and more, so I ended up paying £50 for the year.
I was being a bit sarcastic, I tried for a few hours and could not find anything that was interesting. I cancelled it because I will probably forget to cancel before the 3 months and get charged. Even Prime that sucks has way better content, and the only reason I have prime is for shopping, $80 well spent
 
Netflix’s business model is doomed for a long time, crappy content and rising prices will shut them down in the long run.
 
For those who need to penny pinch in the SS department, can't begrudge them for that. I'm sure they have other areas they'd like to or need to spend $$ in. Even $10 a month can add up. I myself stopped buying orange juice (used to be once a week). Sadly, it was more so b/c the cost went up (as opposed to them being engineered flavor packets, and high in sugar).

I can financially afford to pile on the SS, but can still stand to save the $$. For me, time is the bigger bottleneck, so I'll go with rotating them. Having only one at a time is just right. Make it ad-free (where applicable) to save even more time! I also have CuriosityStream, but that's only $20 per year, so I can make an exception for that since it's so affordable. It's also strictly documentaries, so there's very little overlap with the major SS.
Re orange juice (and other juices) - I drink mine mixed with water or sparkling water. Usually at a ratio of 2/3 water to juice. Tremendously reduces the sugar content, lowers my juice spend, and is still delicious. I usually mix two juices + sparkling water (pomegranate + orange). Or a tart cherry concentrate + sparkling water.
I totally agree about watching spending AND the lack f time to watch everything anyway. Definitely a good option to rotate services, that’s what I’ve started to do with the more expensive and/or those with limited content I want to watch. With the exception of Apple TV an Acorn TV, always new things popping up that I enjoy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ackmondual
Well, don't let me share my account with the children of my gf that live in Colombia and I'll cancel the subscription. Just so it has the opposite effect of what they hoped for. I've been a subscriber for many years, always on the top tier.
 
I feel like the minority that we still love Netflix. My son is addicted to another brand new cartoon they produced. They make interesting shows often enough to keep me interested. Still feels like a good deal…and they just released Animal Babies…cuteness *100000
 
Oh, and like the music industry, that just couldn’t help themselves. Piracy will be back with a vengeance and when they cry about it we should remember the price increases every 60 days and tell them to get bent.
Or we could support the law and not pirate…since that’s what civilization looks like. It is possible to not pay for something and also NOT have it.
 
As someone else mentioned here, the value just isn't there any longer. Netflix had some great ideas, some series that had real long-term promise which they then abruptly canceled (too many to count). Production is expensive, but that's the cost of doing business and creating a substantial base for attracting future paying subscribers. I sometimes wonder if the internal politics at that company.

I do agree with cracking down on the credentials sharing.
 
Snap I cancelled my Netflix account before the next price hike. I’m getting Disney plus & Amazon prime combined for what I was paying to Netflix
Sounds about right, but the geek in me wanted to check (and if prices were waay off, that's where I ask if people are getting deals/promos somewhere)...

per month rate for monthly vs. annual plans (all plans are for in the US)
Amazon Prime: $15 vs. $11.58
Amazon Prime Video (so just the sub to stream their video content): $9 vs $11.58
Disney+: $8 vs. $6.67

So that's a range of $17 to $23. Fairly close to NF's hd plan, cheaper than their 4K plan, but not so with their SD plan.

so you are stealing basically watching on Plex, correct?
Not necessarily. Some DVD/BD purchases come with digital copies of the film. Laws vary on ripping DVDs, but IIRC, that's still allowed. And some folks have shelves and shelves of films and TV series on physical media!
 
Last edited:
For Apple at least, I suspect Apple doesn’t make too much noise over this as their services help sell more hardware. That and they have a fairly generous family plan (6 users) which is also quite a hassle for non family members to partake in.

Imagine a family of 4 is streaming content to an assortment of iPhones and iPads and Apple TVs over AirPods, it’s still money in Apple’s pocket at the end of the day.

Likewise, Disney+ has other revenue streams like merchandise and theme parks. Like your friend streams “the mandalorian”, becomes a Star Wars convert and proceeds to buy baby yoda plushies.

That’s the difference between a company like Apple with deep pockets and who can afford to keep subsidising their content indefinitely because they have other ways of monetising their user base, and a company like Netflix who is solely dependent on subscriber revenue to stay afloat. Netflix may have hits like squid games, but they aren’t making Netflix any extra money beyond possible additional subscribers (who may not even stay on beyond watching that one or two shows).
Netflix has some merchandise sales of Stranger Things. Them metal lunchboxes reminiscent of that time period for one. IIRC, it's not great, but not trivial either.
 
Sounds about right, but the geek in me wanted to check (and if prices were waay off, that's where I ask if people are getting deals/promos somewhere)...

per month rate for monthly vs. annual plans (all plans are for in the US)
Amazon Prime: $15 vs. $11.58
Amazon Prime Video (so just the sub to stream their video content): $9 vs $11.58
Disney+: $15 vs. $11.58

So that's a range of $17 to $23. Fairly close to NF's hd plan, cheaper than their 4K plan, but not so with their SD plan.


Not necessarily. Some DVD/BD purchases come with digital copies of the film. Laws vary on ripping DVDs, but IIRC, that's still allowed. And some folks have shelves and shelves of films and TV series on physical media!
Disney+ is only 7.99 monthly, $6.67/month if paid by the year
 
I’ve been contemplating cancelling Netflix for the last year or so. I’ve had a subscription since the early 2000’s The value to me just isn’t there anymore.
I do share my account with a family member. So what.

Content quality has diminished a lot over the last few years. Value for the service is what matters to me.
Perhaps I’ll wait for Stranger Things to finish. Oh, a split season like they did with Ozark ? Come on…. Dragging it out aren’t they ?

Time for me to go….
 
  • Like
Reactions: sorgo †
Disney+ is only 7.99 monthly, $6.67/month if paid by the year
Thanks for pointing that out (now corrected)! Note that the comparisons are still valid. The error was only there from a copy and paste job, and forgot to change those values for the post. They remain correct when I plugged them in my spreadsheet
 
Netflix is the one steaming service that I always subscribe to. They produce enough good original content to keep me invested and hope for shows that are as good as the ones I love to come in the future. Netflix favs: Stranger Things, Lucifer, Sabrina, Umbrella Academy, Lost in Space, Letter for the King, all the Ryan Reynolds movies, Enola Holmes, Warrior Nun...). That's a lot more than I like for any other one service. but I will have to reconsider if they keep increasing the price. I don't think I can ask my freeloading parents to cough up for Netflix after 18 hours of labor plus college tuition:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sampire51
I still don’t understand how this will work. My wife and I both travel for work. We also have two residences. We’re not sharing we just travel.
I don't know how it will work...but I know how it could work to account for these very common use case variations without breaking the model.

Right now, anyone with Netflix can go to their "recent streaming activity" and see what devices are on, what those devices are, and roughly what area they logged on from.

My guess is combining/leveraging those data points to create heuristics to determine likelihood of violating the terms of use/account sharing.

So, for example...both you and your wife travel...do you get new phones/iPods/laptops/echo shows/smart TVs/whatever everywhere you go? I'd bet not, so you and your wife's account is mostly—it not entirely—signed in from a consistent group of devices...maybe your work and personal laptops, phones, etc. Do you and your wife each have your own profile (watch history, recommendations, reviews) on Netflix? Another point of identification.

Contrast that with, say, an account that has 4 different iPhones signed in...showing activity from multiple profiles in multiple states that overlap on the same day....for 90 days straight.

Could each member of a co-habitating family be on their own individual vacations or business travel in different states with no other sign ins from anywhere else? Of course...but it's unlikely—an edge case. That usage pattern would in all likelihood suggest something like parents in one place sharing the account with their kids in a college town somewhere else.

Is that foolproof? No. My guess is that Netflix will create "lenient" detection "triggers"/thresholds that will reset every month or 3...you know, enough to cover most business travel/vacation patterns. Then, when you get a notice that you've gone past too many thresholds and "violated" the terms of use...they'll selectively sign out certain devices or all of them, then clear the "hold". If, after the hold is removed, 4 different devices re-sign in for Netflix from 4 different states in say, 3 days...then that's likely 4 different people, and your account gets marked.

These are overly simplified examples, but what they do will probably be more complex multi-variant triggers that will cross-reference each other. Thinking that that can't be done just because it hasn't to this point is thinking too narrowly.

Netflix was Laissez-faire about account sharing because it suited them during a growth mindset, chasing ubiquity and omnipresence. Who was going to complain when Netflix kept growing and turning in figures that Wall St loved. They never codified that account sharing, however, and I'd bet a year's salary that that was deliberate.

Now, they turned in a down quarter...changing everything. No one should be surprised that a publicly-traded corporation went back on their "word" (the US legal construct of "corporate personhood" aside...a corporation doesn't have a "word" to give...if it's not in a contract, it doesn't exist) when the money is threatened. Following from that, one can bet that they're throwing all the resources behind these sharing detection efforts and considering lower priced tiers with ads. Their legal fiduciary duty to maximize value to shareholders outweighs everything else. They have to do something for shareholders—gross as it is.
 
For Apple at least, I suspect Apple doesn’t make too much noise over this as their services help sell more hardware. That and they have a fairly generous family plan (6 users) which is also quite a hassle for non family members to partake in.

Imagine a family of 4 is streaming content to an assortment of iPhones and iPads and Apple TVs over AirPods, it’s still money in Apple’s pocket at the end of the day.

Likewise, Disney+ has other revenue streams like merchandise and theme parks. Like your friend streams “the mandalorian”, becomes a Star Wars convert and proceeds to buy baby yoda plushies.

That’s the difference between a company like Apple with deep pockets and who can afford to keep subsidising their content indefinitely because they have other ways of monetising their user base, and a company like Netflix who is solely dependent on subscriber revenue to stay afloat. Netflix may have hits like squid games, but they aren’t making Netflix any extra money beyond possible additional subscribers (who may not even stay on beyond watching that one or two shows).
There are other stand-alone services but also typically part of a conglomerate (HBO Showtime Hulu). Media is big business with lots of competition and very difficult arena to play in. For Netflix to blame the customer, they’ve seemingly admitted to lack of strategy (from content to M&A) in my opinion.
 
I don't know how it will work...but I know how it could work to account for these very common use case variations without breaking the model.

Thank you for the explanation, though I doubt these people will actually signed up for a separate Netflix account should they get flagged as account sharers. They didn’t pay full price before, they are not going to do so now, and the risk is that even the original account holder may decide to terminate his subscription if he can’t find anyone to split the cost with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silverstring
Lol. Netflix going down the clown’s path. They’ll be missing me.

Don’t know where your clown path is but all companies that benefitted from Stay Home during the pandemic are down after opening and down from the fall across all markets.

Peloton, Roblox, Netflix, Disney, Nvidia etc etc etc all benefitted from streaming and gaming from quarantine. They all down a lot.

People, just use rational sense everyone. It’s not hard. Instead of jumping on some angry irrational bandwagon you can look at the bigger picture.
 
I still don’t understand how this will work. My wife and I both travel for work. We also have two residences. We’re not sharing we just travel.

They’ll just add a system that lets you add family members with their own profile password to confirm you are sharing the master account. Apple does this with Family Sharing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anthony13
Don’t know where your clown path is but all companies that benefitted from Stay Home during the pandemic are down after opening and down from the fall across all markets.

Peloton, Roblox, Netflix, Disney, Nvidia etc etc etc all benefitted from streaming and gaming from quarantine. They all down a lot.

People, just use rational sense everyone. It’s not hard. Instead of jumping on some angry irrational bandwagon you can look at the bigger picture.
The clown’s path is cracking down on their “shared account problem” that has existed since its inception and making a bad ad supported model. They’re spending money in all the wrong places yet punching down at their customers to resolve their bad content contract and original content strategy.

Being pithy isn’t “angry irrational bandwagoning” but just avoid barfing out an explicit analysis of their situation that everyone save you seems to understand implicitly.
 
If Netflix wants to crack down on password sharing they should perhaps look internally at their own employees. Imagine my surprise about a year ago after checking my recent streaming activity to find someone in Indiana was logging into my Netflix account. We don’t know anyone in that state nor have we traveled there ever. I changed my password but it makes you wonder since I don’t share my password.

We’ve subbed for the past 20 years or so and we have never complained about the price increases. We are about to cancel due to lack of quality content. Netflix is not what it once was that’s for certain.
 
Don’t know where your clown path is but all companies that benefitted from Stay Home during the pandemic are down after opening and down from the fall across all markets.

Peloton, Roblox, Netflix, Disney, Nvidia etc etc etc all benefitted from streaming and gaming from quarantine. They all down a lot.

People, just use rational sense everyone. It’s not hard. Instead of jumping on some angry irrational bandwagon you can look at the bigger picture.

I find that Netflix’s current woes are due to a number of problems, and cracking down on account sharing is not the panacea they are hoping for.

1) Rising prices. It’s twice the price of a Disney+ sub and easily thrice that of TV+, but I don’t feel I am getting proportionally more value out of it. Especially when I am paying the highest tier chiefly for 4K resolution.

2) Tons of crap content that I cannot be bothered to watch. I am not the sort to rotate my subscriptions, so dumping their episodes all in one sitting doesn’t impact my decision to continue paying every month. Admittedly, netflix still gets my money every month regardless of how much or how little content I consume, but there will come a time when people eventually decide to quit altogether because they will wonder what exactly it is they are paying for.

3) More competition all round, and coupled with rising prices makes it harder for people to justify maintaining access to multiple streaming services. When deciding what to cut, Netflix’s prices stand out the most.

I feel that Netflix is especially more vulnerable because unlike Disney and Apple, they are wholly reliant on subscriber revenue, so any reduction in income will affect their ability to produce new content, which will in turn affect churn, and so on.

It’s still early days, but it could also be the start of a downward spiral we are seeing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ackmondual
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.