Everyone says they don’t want a battery in the Mini. A vast majority chose obsolete design with no advantages.
Except there
are advantages to the "obsolete design" even if you
don't run a Mac server farm: plenty of space for ports, plenty of space for near-silent cooling, no need for an external power brick etc. For many people, the Mini and Studio pass the "small enough" test and there are diminishing returns in making it smaller.
And no one could understood what I was proposing because they took the title too literally.
I think everybody understands what you want - essentially, a laptop without a screen or keyboard.
They don't want it. The potential market is tiny, a niche within what is already (by Apple's standards) a minority market for desktops - and with the way the electronics industry works on economies of scale, that would mean it would have to be very, very expensive.
It would be more expensive than a comparable Mini, heavier than a comparable Mini (or, if lighter, it would be because you need an external power brick) and in daily use the battery would just sit there degrading and eventually need replacing. You
could transport it but you'd either need a desk, display, keyboard and pointing device (and, therefore, probably mains power) at both ends of the journey -
or you'd have to carry a portable, battery powered display and keyboard (each needing separate charging) and juggle 3 boxes - pretty much useless if you ever did want to use it on a train, outdoors or suchlike.
You'd have to look at the pros and cons of a "Mac Liberty" vs. just getting (say) a MacBook - and the reality is that a MacBook (esp. with a dock or USB-C display) can do everything a Mini can do - (including, with M3 onward, running two external displays in clamshell mode) plus a bunch of things (like actual
mobile use) where being all-in-one makes it a whole lot better than a "Mac Liberty".
This is especially true post-Intel since you're getting effectively the same CPU with only minor performance loss due to thermal throttling. Really, nowadays, the
only reason for getting a desktop Mac is if you almost never need to move it.
We wouldn’t be forever stuck with the screen we chose when we bought it. We could buy the computer first, use it with our old screen, get new screens whenever we want, and keep using those screens when we upgrade to a new M5.
Yes, that's certainly a major argument for a Mini/Studio vs. an iMac
which is going to sit on a desktop anyway - but for a laptop that you are going to move around regularly, the advantages of having everything all-in-one, running off the same battery outweigh that.
You didn’t mention shutting down the Air before unhooking and going home, so you probably used its battery.
At the very least I'd want to make sure everything was saved, external drives dismounted etc. before unhooking. If you're talking about daily commuting, shutting down and re-starting isn't exactly one of the labours of Hercules. Where 'just shut the lid and it sleeps' is useful is in "true" mobile use where you're doing it repeatedly - flitting between meetings, on the train etc. for which your "Mac Liberty" really
isn't suited.
Also laptops are hard to use when they are connected to a dongle with HDMI, hard drives, audio interface and instruments connected to it.
...you do seem to have a peculiar inability to touch your equipment without all of the cables falling out - and your Mac Liberty is only going to solve that for the power cord. If you're shuttling between desks with lots of peripherals then that's what Thunderbolt docks are for, whether its a laptop, "Mac Liberty" or Mini.
My current Studio has about 10 things plugged into it
which is partly why I got a Studio, not a MacBook - even if it could run without a power cord it would be totally impractical to move. If I wanted to ferry the Mac around then I'd need to use a TB dock - Mini-with-a-battery wouldn't solve that.
In the past, when I've done the daily commute with a Mac, I've used the tool for the job: a MacBook Pro -
mostly on an 'elevator' stand with an external display and keyboard & a Cinema display at work & various third party displays & USB hubs at home. That left the MacBook's display as a second screen - so it didn't go to waste -
plus I could use the same machine "on the road" when necessary. I've used desktops when they didn't need to move.
Sorry, but the uses of a battery-powered desktop machine are confined to such a tiny chink of the Venn diagram that it just doesn't make sense.