Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I can see why they are choosing to do this BUT it will just result in increased piracy traffic. The market is moving towards streaming whether artists like it or not. Hardly anyone goes out to buy a CD anymore, and digital purchases are also going down due to the better bang for your buck in streaming. This is just a poor excuse to try to increase initial album sales. Give it a couple weeks/months and it will most likely be up on AM/Spotify/GPM.
 
This is the same record company that wanted Apple to sell the physical CDs in Apple Stores. Talk about being out of touch with your consumers.

If they were smart, they'd realize that all they're going to do now is force people to torrent the album and they'll subsequently get no money. If they released it to the streaming services, they'd at least get something. This record label apparently wants to pretend like they live in the year 2000...and I have no clue why.
 
As a non-streamer it does not affect me too much. I look forward to downloading and owning whatever music I like. What really gets me is that there is still restrictions by country and there are songs that if I want I have to pirate because they are not available in the US iTunes store, but in the UK or other country iTunes store. This practice drives piracy and the labels need to get real. also giving away the videos through youtube means i don't need to buy or even stream. Labels just don't get it.
IIRC labels do this because record prices are higher in some countries. Japanese (for example) CDs usually have a few bonus tracks to justify the price increase or else people would just import or pirate.
 
Well I hear The Pirate Bay is still getting it with no DRM and lossless options too
And 0 day usually haha

Edit: it's already on the Bay, god knows since when, as I don't listen to Adele I couldn't care less. But greedy artists piss me off. Sorry, it's not 1994 any more, ya missed it Adele (how old was she back then?), I used to spend my entire allowance on CDs...
 
Last edited:
One thing I find really interesting is Beats1 did a 60 min interview with Adele just yesterday, so either this decision was really last minute, or there isn't any editorial control between departments (which is a good thing).
 
Way to stand up for big business pal. The RIAA's got a job opening for you, do us a favor and take your moderating services over there. Your holier than thou attitude is both insulting and demeaning.

I'm pretty sure Olly enjoys doing his JOB at MacRumors. How is his opinion "holier than thou" ? It's not insulting to criticize an artist and their label to want to be profitable and at the same time talk about ways to steal their work instead?
 
Happy to pay for it but wanted to preview it first. Still I guess that is possible on the itunes store ?
 
This is the same record company that wanted Apple to sell the physical CDs in Apple Stores. Talk about being out of touch with your consumers.

If they were smart, they'd realize that all they're going to do now is force people to torrent the album and they'll subsequently get no money. If they released it to the streaming services, they'd at least get something. This record label apparently wants to pretend like they live in the year 2000...and I have no clue why.

Apple has an army of followers, surely higher than Adele, so her Record Company should really pray no consumer backlash happens, if it does, they're gonna regret it dearly
 
I just don't understand how such a mediocre singer become such a big deal. Amy Winehouse was 100 times better than her.
Totally different type of artist. Adele will do perfectly okay without those complaining on here. She already had record downloads for the first track and will have record downloads for the album.
 
She had one, maybe two cool songs years ago. This new song isn't good. I think everyone is just hyping it up. How it's #1 right now is beyond me. Go ahead Adele/Label, don't put it up. I'm not missing anything. Good luck!
 
  • Like
Reactions: EnesM
Way to stand up for big business pal. The RIAA's got a job opening for you, do us a favor and take your moderating services over there. Your holier than thou attitude is both insulting and demeaning.
He said "Still doesn't justify piracy. If you want it then buy it and if you don't want to buy it go without."

To each their own, but I don't see any attitude in that statement, much less anything insulting or demeaning.

Your post makes it sounds like you're uber-sensitive about being called out for piracy. What's up with that?
 
Screw those greedy people. There are thousands of people making music wanting to get heard any way possible. If the rich artists who already "made it big" want to be greedy then good; less time for their overplayed songs anyways. I'll just listen to someone new who will appreciate me as a paying Apple Music customer.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.