On the other hand, it is clear that Rimm is no threat to iPhone whatsoever.
They have been around for a long time (for smart phones) and are well established, yet they still show a SIGNIFICANTLY lower percentage than iPhone.
It's not surprising that RIM's share is decreasing. I remember being asked by a BlackBerry user to look up some song lyrics on my phone. After I brought out my phone, I paused to ask why he didn't use his phone? He replied that it was a lot more difficult to search with.
Since I've never used another smart phone, I don't know how much more difficult it is to browse with a BlackBerry. But if it isn't a simple matter of starting up the browser and surfing the web, then the browsers that are losing share need to find a way to make it easier. While it may not necessarily attract people, it might keep the retention rate from falling.
This clearly demonstrates the iPhone growth trend ... what kind of spin will Ballmer attempt now?
That idiot doesn't know whether he's coming or going. Best thing to do would be to prevent him from communicating with the outside world.
Huh. Nothing like a report from a mobile ad agency. It's not like they're presenting themselves as the place to go to, or anything.
*cough*
Okay, so we mobile Safari users hit more AdMob supported / embedded sites than anyone else. Not a big surprise, since we usually go to the "real internet".
What's not in the chart is how many of the other phones are hitting mostly mobile sites without AdMob ads.
AdMob does not claim that this information will be necessarily representative of the mobile Web as a whole or of any particular countrymarket. AdMob’s traffic is driven by publisher relationships and may be influenced accordingly.
Without pointing the finger to anybody
all i can say is wow. those are very good numbers for apple and the iphone. now just think if apple had more models to choose from?
An ego stroking article. Seriously, who cares what mobile OS is used most to view ads ?
There isn't representative of anything remotely useful to gauge the iPhone's popularity or growth.
Yet another poorly made study for people to accept as fact
What ? They'd display even more ads ?
These numbers mean squat. Why is everyone so excited about viewing ads ? Maybe some aren't quite understanding that this isn't about the iPhone's market share at all.![]()
Why is everyone so excited about viewing ads ? Maybe some aren't quite understanding that this isn't about the iPhone's market share at all.![]()
The point isn't that there are more iPhones out there (and I agree that people shouldn't be taking that as being the point), but that none of these ads are viewed on their own. People aren't just loading up an ad and staring at it! It's loaded as part of a Web page or application, which makes these numbers (very, very) roughly indicative of the proportion of mobile Web surfers browsing on each platform. If there are more ad views (where ad views ≈ page views) on iPhone than Symbian, even though there are more Symbian units out there, that means there is probably a higher proportion of iPhone users browsing the Web (versus not doing so) than on the Symbian platform. All that said, naturally, considering the source, a roughly dishwasher-sized grain of salt is recommended. (Edit: and as seedster2 notes, bringing up numbers from such a source in a debate would be beyond foolish.)
Yeah, AbMob should fudge the basis of the ranking (# of ad requests) just so that your Blackberry ranks #2. Sure...at least blackberry is ranked 5th, BUT STILL A DISGRACE IT SHOULD BE #2!!!!
While the iPhone is the obvious clear winner, the table isn't fair as it just says "iPhone", while the other brands/models are specific models.
RIM OS? Do they mean BlackBerry OS?
Isn't there a ad-blocker for iPhone Safari or why is everyone so impressed that iPhone users see the most ads?