Hardware acceleration is not difficult on anything that supports corevideo, but adobe refuses to leverage already available libraries. Apple writes new libraries essentially for Adobe, and you're still blaming apple for Flash's performance?
How am I blaming Apple, someone asked a question and I answered it. I didn't call Apple lazy or anything like that.
im still with apple dropping flash. and yes i have read that its apples limited api's but if adobe weren't only just getting round to this it wouldnt still be a problem.
Not available on any Mac Pro models?
So does this mean no more of that white box in the upper left-hand corner that we saw in the Gala preview? Because I have yet to see it...
That list is not all-inclusive - the hardware-accelerated Flash beta has been working on my MacBook Air (2nd gen, 1.86GHz processor w/ NVidia 9400M) just fine. Yes, I did see the annoying white square (which I assume will now be going away, hopefully...).
It certainly makes Flash better that it was, but don't set your expectations too high - it's still Flash, it's still more of a resource hog than many other audio/video formats. Just less so than before.![]()
Does that mean no support for the October Aluminium Macbooks? It has the 9400M as well.![]()
Flash is hw accelerated in almost every video card in windows because Microsoft provided the necessary APIs long ago. Apple just got around to it very recently. If they dedicated the resources, they could have the acceleration working on the 8600M GT in my Pro laptop. It's not like they can't afford to hire some people to do it... they made how much last quarter?Adobe lazy programers, how come that flash is hw accelerated in almost every video card in windows and not in osx?
If you look at it carefully, adobe started it all. For example there is no cheap Adobe Acrobat in osx, only in windows. Adobe abandoned the osx platform quite a while, so why should Apple be so friendly with adobe?
.
Yeah this is basically just a more stable version of Gala, nothing more. I kinda miss that white box though, it was like a Companion Cube. (hopefully someone gets that one)
from such wikiing and googling, it seems that hardware acceleration even for windows is a relatively new feature. i failed to find this conclusively however 10.1 most certainly was the first release of flash that supported h.264 hardware acceleration. and h.264 has been out for a little more than a while now!Flash is hw accelerated in almost every video card in windows because Microsoft provided the necessary APIs long ago.
I hardly call this "support." Adobe just doesn't develop Flash well for the Mac and will not be up to snuff anytime soon.
2009 and on? Who the hell am I supposed to be mad at? How screwed up is that?