Which is why it would be more appropriate to compare software to software. I'm not gonna get too into that argument, though, 'cause it looks like you've already moved on to talking about Quicktime. Ok, that's a much better comparison.
But you seem to be opperating under the misconception that we are complainnig that there are ANY differences in Windows versions. That's a silly thing for you to argue against since it's not what anyone is complaining about. We are all saying that Windows has too MANY versions.
So by pointing out 2 versions of Quicktime or 2 versions of OS X you aren't proving a darn thing. If there were 4 or 5 versions of Quicktime, you'd have a point. But there aren't.
I never heard anyone complain about XP Home vs. XP Pro. That's because 2 choices is perfectly reasonable. (Photoshop and Photoshop LE...Final Cut or Final Cut Express...iPhoto or Aperture...and hey, like you said, Macbook and Macbook Pro) The list of split product lines is very, very long. No one here is arguing against that. But somehow you feel the need to defend it.
That's not the issue. The issue is the much larger number of Vista versions out there. I continue to think it's stupid and I've seen nothing yet that has convinced me otherwise. You've spent a lot of posts arguing against things that we aren't really saying.
