Wonder if he wore flip flops to client meetings? Probably OK as long as he was also wearing socks.
Just imagine the overflowing creativity possible with Cook always asking, "How much does this cost again?, Can't we just put up a spinning iPhone and be done with it?"
I'm referring to the mythical AirPower. Where's that?You cannot say "iphones dont wirelessly charge" and "costs a grand" in the same complaint. Their $1000 phones do wirelessly charge, heck even their $600ish phones wirelessly charge.
I
I'm referring to the mythical AirPower. Where's that?
Also, the 'costs a grand' still stands. Unless you're going to say that Apple doesn't overcharge for their gear.
And that’s grown to be nearly a trillion dollars in valuation and raking in $$$/quarter. Yes, times have changed at Apple and it’s up to the reader to decide for better or worse. My take, for the better.I would have quit too if I had produced such iconic, influential body of work for a company that now seems perfectly content with vapid Memoji tripe.
It’s possible for the iPhone to sell itself and still have corporate advertising behind it and still not have that straw-man inconsistency going on. For an example if a well known brand that doesn’t let up see coke.I thought Apple devices used to sell themselves though (that's what many commenters here seem to believe). Why did Apple need "amazing and memorable ads" back then and can get away with less memorable ones now and still sell so many devices (even though theses devices are less "awesome or innovative").
I'm just replying to you to latch on to what you said to point out inconsistencies in people's arguments against Apple (not saying you're being inconsistent).
And that’s grown to be nearly a trillion dollars in valuation and raking in $$$/quarter. Yes, times have changed at Apple and it’s up to the reader to decide for better or worse. My take, for the better.
Right we all know apple never produced in failures in the past, pre-2011, that came off of Foxconn conveyor belt.Well, my friend, therein lies the big contradiction. When they were "hungry and foolish" they wouldn't push half-baked trash to the market because their image was critically dependent on top spec delivery. Now that they're the highest valuated company they coast along based on brand recognition alone and sell whatever comes out of the Foxconn conveyor belt.
The reader doesn't buy a trillion dollars for Cook to play with and doesn't benefit from that either, they buy a gawd-expensive device that's likely to flex, break or malfunction within weeks.
Right we all know apple never produced in failures in the past, pre-2011, that came off of Foxconn conveyor belt.
For the record, The reader/consumer/customer benefits from a large company with enough resources to carry on the company mission.
In the olden days, cases were given out. Today jeans are tighter than ever to your point.
Because of USB 3.1God, I miss those days
Magsafe, why did you have to go away?
The reader even edits from a company that gives them what they want. Making $84B it’s obvious people were buying apple products. Some maybe because they liked the products. Others because apple products are the best of the worst or some others because they are stuck. 84B is a large number for an indifferent corporation to foist on unsuspecting customers.Of course there were defects and mistakes. There weren't DOA garbage like the TouchBar MacBook Pros or pre-bent iPads that "are OK", a useless Siri and cluttered SKUs across their entire product line. They'd focus on a trim list of strong products and swiftly take corrective action instead of a lame apology.
The reader doesn't benefit from a large indifferent company that doesn't care enough to use its own resources and is bleeding said reader through the nose to buy their non-upgrades.
I don't even get what your last sentence is supposed to mean.
Well Steve wore Birks all the time. I do too, even in client/producer meetings. (Then again I work in Bondi lol)Wonder if he wore flip flops to client meetings? Probably OK as long as he was also wearing socks.
So too has 80% of vision having left the building it seems, seems but too easily seen.Those were amazing and memorable ads.
Now an iPhone spins in a circle. Creativity has left the building.
I was too young when it aired, and was a hardcore PC gamer in the 90's when I finally saw it. Very iconic of the times in early home computers-no one knew what they could do yet-because we were the beta testers. It was all symbolism and hype-but this ad took the cake in reaching. One of the first ad's I'll never forget-I loved it.
For me the ad campaigns he made stood for something. It made me feel proud using Apple gear. Today's Apple ads can be from anyone... change the name... and voilà.
I wish him a good retirement and thank him for his excellent job.
Vista's release was a very dark time for Microsoft. They recovered with Windows 7 and though (IMHO) Windows is still not as good as an experience as macOS or iOS, it's user experience is fine.Anyone else just rewatch all the MAC vs PC ads... loved them - simple, witty and memorable.
The jabs at the disaster that was Vista were hilarious.
Where’s that charm these days? So much has changed in a decade.
If you want to look at the highest priced phone they make, then sure.. Apple does make very good phones at much more reasonable prices. $600 for the iPhone 8 is a very reasonable price, same with the iPhone 7 at $449.I
I'm referring to the mythical AirPower. Where's that?
Also, the 'costs a grand' still stands. Unless you're going to say that Apple doesn't overcharge for their gear.
^ you have NO IDEA what it was like to read manuals, load software via cassette on a Vic20 or C64 back then!!! EEEK....
The Macintosh was a visionary computer ... not unlike what KnightRider was to the car industry today: AI, TV screens, remote start, remote lock/unlock, maps, autonomous driving, etc.
[doublepost=1550201130][/doublepost]
Artist do what they do best ... create ART ... vision with purpose!
Ripoff different
Bend different
Throttle different
Dongle different
etc.