Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's important to remember that when companies are competing, they're not necessarily "enemies." One division of a company can be competing with another company's similar division, and yet two different divisions of both companies are working together tightly.

Another big example is Samsung; Samsung definitely competes with Apple when it comes to the phones themselves, yet Apple buys a crapton of display panels and other parts from Samsung to make their phones!

Companies work together and compete at the same time constantly, it's not weird and it's rare that they "hate each other" for lack of a better term.
Indeed. This is how business works. Many of the traditional IT outsourcing companies work with AWS ato satisfy customer demand even though AWS itself competes directly with their traditional business units. Although Intel’s ad campaign seems a little ill times and petty on some levels. If Apple and Intel see a common hround then same as with Samsung, business will be done. Rarely in the grown up world of business does it get play ground petty lole thr PC/Mac fanboys think it does. Apple likely needs a diversification of partners in this area long term anyway.
 
It's important to remember that when companies are competing, they're not necessarily "enemies." One division of a company can be competing with another company's similar division, and yet two different divisions of both companies are working together tightly.

Another big example is Samsung; Samsung definitely competes with Apple when it comes to the phones themselves, yet Apple buys a crapton of display panels and other parts from Samsung to make their phones!

Companies work together and compete at the same time constantly, it's not weird and it's rare that they "hate each other" for lack of a better term.
In a few things you are right. But remember something, when Samsung attacks Apple with theirs post/tweets/videos, this is Samsung mobile, not Samsung Technologies (the principal company) and not Samsung Displays. In this case of Intel, the principal company (not the sub division that doesn´t exist yet) its attacking Apple, the have to take care about their bussines first if they want Apple as a client.

Second, and most important, Apple have to work with Samsung because they are the only ones that can make millions of high quality displays before the launch, Apple have many attempts whit so many suppliers to do something similar and don´t have to work with samsung, but any supplier can't have the samsung level in this area for the iphone's displays. Apple its very plenty working with TSMC, they have been working in A chips a long time (Also with Samsung but that failed), so Apple doesn´t need Intel like they need Samsung
 
They may or may not make the M series chips but I can see them making the modem chips for apple and maybe some other chips where the foundry capabilities are more than adequate.
 
Intel has realized they made a very bad mistake mocking Apple. They need t try and stop the bleeding for the sake of their business. This news is an olive branch. I don't think Apple wants to continue with Intel. The marriage is over.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Maximara
It seems Intel is still filled with self grandeur. At some point they have to come down to earth. Hope it is before the bankruptcy. We do need a US based foundry.
A quick google search shows Intel's valued at $260 billion.
 
If they were made here in the USA, awesome move Apple!👍

yeah no mate. That is not gojng to Happen

I swear this desperate company is smoking crack or some ganja if they are this desperate after attacking Apple with anti M1 ads
 
Intel's behaviour is a bit like a stalking, crazy, ex-girlfriend who assaults you and destroys your property but also wants to get back together and loves you very much.
Ah More like the crazy ex stalker and her sane sister you’d date.
In a few things you are right. But remember something, when Samsung attacks Apple with theirs post/tweets/videos, this is Samsung mobile, not Samsung Technologies (the principal company) and not Samsung Displays. In this case of Intel, the principal company (not the sub division that doesn´t exist yet) its attacking Apple, the have to take care about their bussines first if they want Apple as a client.

I seriously doubt anyone at Apple cares about Intel’s ads beyond having a good laugh.

To steal a line from The Godfather, it isn’t personal, it’s business. Letting hurt feelings drive a business decision is a bad idea.
 
Intel cannot keep pace now in shrinking die sizes. They don't have the tech.
It sounds like the new CEO wants to double down on process investments so that they can catch back up to TSMC. If they succeed, then I’m sure Apple would at least consider them. They have used Samsung fabs in the past. Apple has diversified its supply chain in the past.
 
Someday Apple will make its own chips and ditch TSMC. They have enough money to do that
 
It sounds like the new CEO wants to double down on process investments so that they can catch back up to TSMC. If they succeed, then I’m sure Apple would at least consider them. They have used Samsung fabs in the past. Apple has diversified its supply chain in the past.
I am not so sure about that! I do not think Intel is capable of making those advanced chips anymore!
 
If Intel wants to court Apple for future chip orders, the anti-Apple ads the company is running now may be unwise.
The ad campaign is unwise regardless of whether or not Intel is courting Apple. It shows Intel in really poor light, and the creators of those ads as being clueless. The ads have nothing to do with the processor as the machines are identical to what they were when running on Intel, except they run a whole lot better on the M1.
 
Last edited:
Intel will have to change their “interface” to the design data, if they’re anything like they were back in the 2000s. They used mils instead of microns, all their terminology was weird and non-standard, they used their own weird file formats, etc. They were not set up to accept an arbitrary gdsii file from an outside source, even if it met their design rules, and their non-standard terminology made it hard to even understand their requirements. When I interviewed intel employees and asked them what their experience was, the words they used were not words used anywhere else in the industry.
 
Sorry Intel, you're not getting a cent from Apple's chips. You don't get to take credit for these.
This is business so if they can be competitive I'm pretty sure Apple wouldn't turn them down. The real question is how are they going to leapfrog TSMC which is currently way ahead in their manufacturing technology.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.