Sorry Intel, you're not getting a cent from Apple's chips. You don't get to take credit for these.
Probably 10 years outThey would need to have capacity first, so they cannot go currently seriously after foundry business, that is 3-4 years minimum out ... lots of time to see what they can and cannot do
Indeed. This is how business works. Many of the traditional IT outsourcing companies work with AWS ato satisfy customer demand even though AWS itself competes directly with their traditional business units. Although Intel’s ad campaign seems a little ill times and petty on some levels. If Apple and Intel see a common hround then same as with Samsung, business will be done. Rarely in the grown up world of business does it get play ground petty lole thr PC/Mac fanboys think it does. Apple likely needs a diversification of partners in this area long term anyway.It's important to remember that when companies are competing, they're not necessarily "enemies." One division of a company can be competing with another company's similar division, and yet two different divisions of both companies are working together tightly.
Another big example is Samsung; Samsung definitely competes with Apple when it comes to the phones themselves, yet Apple buys a crapton of display panels and other parts from Samsung to make their phones!
Companies work together and compete at the same time constantly, it's not weird and it's rare that they "hate each other" for lack of a better term.
In a few things you are right. But remember something, when Samsung attacks Apple with theirs post/tweets/videos, this is Samsung mobile, not Samsung Technologies (the principal company) and not Samsung Displays. In this case of Intel, the principal company (not the sub division that doesn´t exist yet) its attacking Apple, the have to take care about their bussines first if they want Apple as a client.It's important to remember that when companies are competing, they're not necessarily "enemies." One division of a company can be competing with another company's similar division, and yet two different divisions of both companies are working together tightly.
Another big example is Samsung; Samsung definitely competes with Apple when it comes to the phones themselves, yet Apple buys a crapton of display panels and other parts from Samsung to make their phones!
Companies work together and compete at the same time constantly, it's not weird and it's rare that they "hate each other" for lack of a better term.
I hear you can get him and Justin Long as a package deal.In unrelated news... Intel's Chief Marketing Officer is back on the job market.
A quick google search shows Intel's valued at $260 billion.It seems Intel is still filled with self grandeur. At some point they have to come down to earth. Hope it is before the bankruptcy. We do need a US based foundry.
If they were made here in the USA, awesome move Apple!👍
Ah More like the crazy ex stalker and her sane sister you’d date.Intel's behaviour is a bit like a stalking, crazy, ex-girlfriend who assaults you and destroys your property but also wants to get back together and loves you very much.
In a few things you are right. But remember something, when Samsung attacks Apple with theirs post/tweets/videos, this is Samsung mobile, not Samsung Technologies (the principal company) and not Samsung Displays. In this case of Intel, the principal company (not the sub division that doesn´t exist yet) its attacking Apple, the have to take care about their bussines first if they want Apple as a client.
It sounds like the new CEO wants to double down on process investments so that they can catch back up to TSMC. If they succeed, then I’m sure Apple would at least consider them. They have used Samsung fabs in the past. Apple has diversified its supply chain in the past.Intel cannot keep pace now in shrinking die sizes. They don't have the tech.
I am not so sure about that! I do not think Intel is capable of making those advanced chips anymore!It sounds like the new CEO wants to double down on process investments so that they can catch back up to TSMC. If they succeed, then I’m sure Apple would at least consider them. They have used Samsung fabs in the past. Apple has diversified its supply chain in the past.
This. Both Europe and the US should be able to manufacture 5nm chips.Chip making needs to rely much less on Taiwan. Who cares about the anti-M1 ads. Intel making chips for Apple can be good news.
The ad campaign is unwise regardless of whether or not Intel is courting Apple. It shows Intel in really poor light, and the creators of those ads as being clueless. The ads have nothing to do with the processor as the machines are identical to what they were when running on Intel, except they run a whole lot better on the M1.If Intel wants to court Apple for future chip orders, the anti-Apple ads the company is running now may be unwise.
That's it! I'm getting an AMD!
This is business so if they can be competitive I'm pretty sure Apple wouldn't turn them down. The real question is how are they going to leapfrog TSMC which is currently way ahead in their manufacturing technology.Sorry Intel, you're not getting a cent from Apple's chips. You don't get to take credit for these.