Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Looks promising useful, and has potential for wide-scale adoption.

En********ation will start in around 18 months. Get it while you can!

Start in 18 months?..how about started two years ago? Adding AI to a browser, any browser, IS enpoopification.

charging a fee to use a browser should be a felony

I take it you wern't on the web during the Netscape era.
 
I'm not sure what an AI-based browser is supposed to do for me. Can someone explain why I need something like this? It summarizes the webpage I'm looking at? Why wouldn't I just read it. I'm not being snarky - I'm legitimately asking what benefits something like this provides.

I've downloaded it, so I'll find out what it can do, I guess...
please let us know, i am pretty sure many of us are wondering the same thing
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ad47uk
I know it is standard at the moment, but 20 bucks a month is steep for consumer use. Soon these types of features are just going to be what browsers have.
I agree

I find all that I need with free ChatGPT and Grok and all is fine for my needs and can live with the limitations it has for now

I could justify this if it were less than $20/mo, but that amount for removing limitations on things like chat and stuff seems a bit steep if you ask me

Mark my words, I think within a decade or so (maybe in less time), a lot of these features will be integrated into all browsers and we shouldn't have to pay extra for them
 
I'm not sure what an AI-based browser is supposed to do for me.

I'm personally skeptical, but I think the pitch goes something like: you use your browser a lot to do search + research; this will assist you in that workflow. If you think about how Safari 1.0 had a built-in search field in the toolbar, then eventually even merged the search field with the address field because it's just so common that people want to type something to search, the progress could be "what if people can type a question that an LLM answers for them".

Now, two problems:

  • I think this overestimates how much lasting value LLMs will have. We're in the middle of a hype cycle. How many people will pay $20/mo just for this?
  • But the much bigger problem for Atlassian specifically is: to use Steve Jobs's parlance, this is a feature, not a product. Back then, he decided "instead of buying Dropbox, we can just build our own syncable folder". These days, browser vendors might decide, "instead of licensing Dia, we can just put a damn textbox in our own browsers". What's the thing Dia can do that would require a lot of work for Apple, Google, Microsoft, Mozilla to do? Nothing. There's nothing there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hagar
The one interesting product they had was Arc, but they couldn't find a good business model for it, so they killed it.

Nobody is going to use or even remember Dia a few years from now.
Just when I switched to Arc, they decided to stop adding features and focus on Dia.
But Arc is not dead, it’s still receiving updates.
 
OK cool, but Google is likely to put all of this and more into Chrome for 'free' (as in if it's free or ad supported, you are the product).

But I'm sure that the tens of thousands or so users that will use this are happy.

And I'm happy that the Browser Company got acquired. As Netscape found in the 90s, providing a browser as your main product when other companies with deep pockets will make one for free, is not sustainable.

And on that note - who on earth uses Opera? And how on earth has it survived that long? Maybe I'm wrong.
 
Google have enough income to run Gemini from their ad business but AI summaries are killing CTR putting them into a death spiral. They either pull the AI from search or insert ads into Gemini, instantly making it untrustworthy. Did it find the right answer or the one it was paid to promote?

Yeah... and I bet that there's already ad-blocker with AI, that will really kill the business. Or not?
 
It won't. Lol. AI will be everywhere in the next couple of years.

You must be too young to have noticed the metaverse bubble, crypto bubble, dotcom bubble and the two major home computer bubbles circa 1990.

A bubble popping doesn’t mean the technology disappears. It means many start ups fail, a lot of investor money is lost, the left overs are acquired by the winners.

This week JP Morgan and the Bank of England said the valuations are too high and the AI bubble is going to hurt people.

Apple will be least affected by the bursting of the bubble because they played safe. They slowly accumulate and implement the useful stuff cleanly without coming off as hyping it or shoving the AI bits down your throat.
 
I think we will be waiting a long long time from Apple that actually works and actually wows us.

What is “wow” us? AI tools in an operating system and apps should not be like lasers and unicorns jumping out of the screen like those 1998 Intel ads. The features should not feel intrusive. They should be there if we need them and out of the way when we don’t need them.
 
Sounds like a privacy nightmare. No thanks

Oh I wouldn't worry about any privacy issues with your data in the hands of companies.


Screenshot 2025-10-09 at 09.52.07.png



 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.