Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
65,979
34,766


Leading artificial intelligence companies including OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic are facing "diminishing returns" from their costly efforts to build newer AI models, according to a new Bloomberg report. The stumbling blocks appear to be growing in size as Apple continues a phased rollout of its own AI features through Apple Intelligence.

chatgpt-for-iphone-feature.jpg

OpenAI's latest model, known internally as Orion, has reportedly fallen short of the company's performance expectations, particularly in handling coding tasks. The model is said to be lacking the significant improvements over existing systems when compared to the gains GPT-4 made versus its predecessor.

Google is also reportedly facing similar obstacles with its upcoming Gemini software, while Anthropic has delayed the release of its anticipated Claude 3.5 Opus model. Industry experts who spoke to Bloomberg attributed the challenges to the increasing difficulty in finding "new, untapped sources of high-quality, human-made training data" and the enormous costs associated with developing and operating new models concurrently with existing ones.

Silicon Valley's belief that more computing power, data, and larger models will inevitably lead to better performance, and ultimately the holy grail – artificial general intelligence (AGI) – could be based on false assumptions, suggests the report. Consequently, companies are now exploring alternative approaches, including further post-training (incorporating human feedback to improve responses and refining the tone) and developing AI tools called agents that can perform targeted tasks, such as booking flights or sending emails on a user's behalf.

"The AGI bubble is bursting a little bit," said Margaret Mitchell, chief ethics scientist at AI startup Hugging Face. She told Bloomberg that "different training approaches" may be needed to make AI models work really well on a variety of tasks. Other experts who spoke to the outlet echoed Mitchell's sentiment.

How much impact these challenges will have on Apple's approach is unclear, though Apple Intelligence is more focused in comparison, and the company uses internal large language models (LLMs) grounded in privacy. Apple's AI services mainly operate on-device, while the company's Private Cloud Compute encrypted servers are only pinged for tasks requiring more advanced processing power.

Apple is integrating AI capabilities into existing products and services, including writing tools, Siri improvements, and image generation features, so it can't be said to be competing directly in the LLM space. However, Apple has agreed a partnership with OpenAI that allows Siri to optionally hand off more open-ended queries to ChatGPT. Apple has also reportedly held discussions with other LLM companies about similar outsourcing partnerships.

It's possible that the challenges faced by major AI companies pursuing breakthrough general-purpose AI models could ultimately validate Apple's more conservative strategy of developing specific AI features that enhance the user experience. In that sense, its privacy-first policy may not be the straitjacket it first seemed. Apple plans to expand Apple Intelligence features next month with the release of iOS 18.2 and then via further updates through 2025.

Article Link: AI Companies Reportedly Struggling to Improve Latest Models
 
"new, untapped sources of high-quality, human-made training data"

Ha choice quote right there. They’ve scraped all they can scrape and they can’t scrape no more!

Nobody seriously thought this was going to be AGI any time soon, not anyone that was paying attention. The agent based approach in the article is the only thing they’ll be good at.

Apple should be fine. All I need Siri to do is understand the data on my phone it already has access to. I don’t need generative anything, just don’t be so dumb.
 
Anthropic Claude has been increasing price dramatically while Google Geminis and Open AI ChatGPT its very cheaper than it. Atleast on the case of Anthropic its a bubble about to blow up.
 
Last edited:
Siri has been living in the past since 2011. Apple has had ample time to ‘fix’ it’s ’ground breaking digital assistant’, but instead we get (IMO), useless AGI.

headsmackmeme.gif

Reading the stories about it over the years, seems it was as good as it was going to get when they bought it, they never could fix it, and quickly stopped caring.

If it took this AGI bubble to get them to care again then I guess it was worth it.

We aren’t going to get (and aren’t ready for) AGI, we’re clearly hitting a wall with this but what we have now is good enough to improve Siri substantially.
 
Not quite sure what they’re expecting. It’s just glorified pattern-recognition software, and there are only so many ways to dress it up as ‘the next big thing’.

Yup. I did some work with pattern recognition in the 70's. Fascinating stuff and not new; the only thing new is the availability of, and the ability to, take in large data sets.
 
I'm not surprised that a pattern recognition algorithm cannot really become intelligent. Pattern recognition is a big evolutionary advantage for humans but it is one of many different skills we developed along the evolutionary trajectory that got us here.
 
AI is the most overblown technology since AR/VR. ChatGPT and Gemini will give different answers to the same questions a lot of the time. They will even give different answers to the same question, within each app. The amount of misinformation that is coming from AI is staggering.
I agree with just about all that you said. My disagreement is on AR. Who ever gets this right wins the game.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.