Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I get your second paragraph is supposed to be sacrascm, but it’s the exact opposite. The EU is trying to end proprietary hardware (lightning) and software with the Digital Markets Act (DMA). It wants interoperability (which putting iTunes on Windows does) and ceases being proprietary.
And the way the EU “tries” to end proprietary hardware is… to wait and let the adults create USB-C then say “Disregard everything we said before today DO THAT! HA HA! We forced you to adopt the standard you created, how do you feel about that! And we’ll force you to adopt it a year after you said you would, just to pour salt into the wound! We are SO very effective, we are.” LOL

iTunes is still proprietary. The EU of today would have fined Apple a few billion and forced them to open FairPlay, if it wasn’t for the fact that the DMA avoids ANY mention of streaming music as the world leader is based in the EU… can’t upset THAT Apple (heh) cart. 🙂
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: I7guy and Zenman12
Its nice to see it finally expanding, hopefully Apple will work with Google to make it official if not, i hope the EU looks into why Apple isn't working with Google on this. Proprietary protocols in modern ages should not be a thing especially when it comes to consumer electronics and interoperability.
 
And the way the EU “tries” to end proprietary hardware is… to wait and let the adults create USB-C then say “Disregard everything we said before today DO THAT! HA HA! We forced you to adopt the standard you created, how do you feel about that! And we’ll force you to adopt it a year after you said you would, just to pour salt into the wound! We are SO very effective, we are.” LOL

iTunes is still proprietary. The EU of today would have fined Apple a few billion and forced them to open FairPlay, if it wasn’t for the fact that the DMA avoids ANY mention of streaming music as the world leader is based in the EU… can’t upset THAT Apple (heh) cart. 🙂
That’s literally not what happened. Not understanding the rest of what you’re saying but okay. 👍
 
That’s literally not what happened. Not understanding the rest of what you’re saying but okay. 👍
The EU said, “Do microUSB”. Tech said, “Yeah, whatever” and started working on USB-C. Even AFTER USB-C had reached version 1.0, the EU were continually updating their microUSB Memorandum of Understanding. Once they realized that no one was going to do microUSB, then they were like, “NOT ONLY was USB-C our idea, we’re going to force you to adopt it! That was in 2022. The first USB-C devices shipped in 2015.

So, ok, the EU in 2022 mandated something to happen in 2024 that had been shipping on devices since 2015. There weren’t even any major manufacturers that, as of the end of 2024, were still shipping non-USB-C devices.
 
The EU said, “Do microUSB”. Tech said, “Yeah, whatever” and started working on USB-C.
The EU did not say "Do microUSB". The EU said, "Do common charger". The Industry chose microUSB.

Prior to 2009 these were some of the charging connectors used by manufactures.
Nokia-Adapters.jpg


Samsung's proprietary charging connector from 2005 to 2009 is in the middle. From 2009 to 2016 Samsung switched to microUSB as did almost every manufacturer.

Even AFTER USB-C had reached version 1.0,
USB-C began development in 2012, the specification for 1.0 released in 2014.

USB-C was officially accepted as an international standard by IEC in 2016, then Manufacturers started adopting USB-C. Samsung started the switch from microUSB to USB-C in 2016 with Galaxy Note 7.

the EU were continually updating their microUSB Memorandum of Understanding.

The MoU expired in 2014, it was never updated after that. The Radio Equipment Directive (2022) which mandated USB-C is what replaced the MoU.
Once they realized that no one was going to do microUSB,
Everyone switched to microUSB except Apple who introduced lighting connector in 2012.

From 2010 onward manufacturers by and large started to make the switch to microUSB, Acer, Samsung, HTC, Sony, LG, Microsoft, Nokia, etc.


then they were like, “NOT ONLY was USB-C our idea, we’re going to force you to adopt it! That was in 2022. The first USB-C devices shipped in 2015.
The beauty about laws is that when circumstances change, the laws also change.

In the meantime, as USB Micro-B is unable to power new, bigger phones at reasonable speed, most manufacturers started to shift towards the faster USB Type-C ('USB-C') connectors, first on high-end and now also on mid-range phones and small portable devices. The latest attempt at an agreement on a MoU was proposed by the industry in 2018; while also promoting a shift to USB-C connectors, however it would still allow the use of proprietary connectors, which was deemed unacceptable by the Commission.

So, ok, the EU in 2022 mandated something to happen in 2024 that had been shipping on devices since 2015. There weren’t even any major manufacturers that, as of the end of 2024, were still shipping non-USB-C devices.
Apple, arguably one of the largest manufacturer of phones, still shipped iPhone the most successful singular consumer device on the planet.
 
Love AirDrop. I use it extensively. One of the reasons why I don't prefer to buy Android is the lack of this feature. Will be good if it makes it way onto the new Galaxy phones coming out later this month.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrSnirf and mganu
The beauty about laws is that when circumstances change, the laws also change.
The beauty about the industry working voluntarily is that large important changes can be adopted without laws. And, as those companies understand their users, they can ensure that the change brings the least impact to their users.
“A June 2021 study done for the Commission estimated that in 2019, 44 % of mobile
phones sold in the EU had a USB-C connector at the device end, while 38 % (mostly older and lower-
end phones) had a USB Micro-B, and 18 % had Apple's Lightning connector. According to the study,
without any regulatory intervention, USB Micro-B is expected to be completely superseded by
USB-C connectors by 2026, while the Lightning share will stay the same.”
The EU found that WITHOUT intervention, the industry was moving to USB-C. They could have done nothing and we’d have the same result. However, they still felt compelled to, as I indicated, enact regulation that essentially said,”That thing you’re doing voluntarily? Yeah, now we force you to do it!”

And, even though public comments available indicated that Apple would be supporting Lightning for 10 years (the plan that, in reality, they followed through with) because Apple doesn’t comment on unreleased products, the EU regulators felt that they had to pass a law JUST for Apple. They felt this would be cutting the transition time by two years (as they thought that Apple would be using lightning 14 years later. Even though, for anyone paying attention, Apple didn’t even support the 30 pin connector that long AND had said that Lightning would be the “modern connector for the next decade”.) The law, in effect, gave Apple an additional year before needing to remove lightning from the iPhone (the law was for December 31, 2024, Apple switched on their timeline in Sept. 2023). The passage above says that the rationale for the thinking that the Lightning share would “stay the same” in 2026 (even with evidence to the contrary) can be found on page 25. That document only has 11 pages… sooooo, no need to show your work, I guess. 😀
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
The beauty about the industry working voluntarily is that large important changes can be adopted without laws.
Except Apple. The reason the laws were needed was Apple refusing to transition iPhones to USB C. The industry adopted RCS except Apple so laws had to be made to require them to.
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
Reactions: I7guy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.