Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This would be fantastic. Being able to wirelessly stream the screen from a Mac would save a lot of time and energy, although it might cut in to sales of an Apple TV (although probably not too badly).
 
What's interesting though is how this is what Google TV was cut off from doing. Networks wouldn't be able to tell you were mirroring in this fashion. If Apple redesigned the remote app to allow access your to Mac's screen, this would rock. They could even offer some of the functionality of Google TV in this way...

Though, I doubt that's where they're going. They killed of Front Row, and this would have been the next logical evolution of the Front Row app.

Hello Plex....


This is great news for people using their computers to watch TV shows via the network websites, especially those only available with Flash. Now you can start a show in a browser window on your mac in one room, and Airplay it to any ATV2 in the house.

I had originally planned to get a mac mini to hook up to my TV, but the way they are rolling out the Apple TV connectivity, that is no longer necessary. Instead of another $600 + (for a mac mini), I can just use my current Macbook Pro and Airplay to however many Apple TV's I want!

(I hope Airplay mirroring on the mac comes with audio. It does on the iPad 2, so I'd expect it to.)
 
Try this... http://www.airserverapp.com/

Is doing exactly what you want :D

This just lets you circumvent having an Apple tv, and let's your IOS device stand in for one.

To really get what someone "really wants" out of it, you need 2 items. The second requiring you to jail break your IOS device.

Why would you need to stream your pictures, movies, and videos to your Mac? (They're probably already on it???)

It just let you stream air play enabled apps like Vevo, but again, you can already watch all that content on your mac and in better screen quality.

If it did mirroring of your IOS device, that would be worth it. Photo hunt on a 3.5" screen rather sucks.
 
This would be fantastic. Being able to wirelessly stream the screen from a Mac would save a lot of time and energy, although it might cut in to sales of an Apple TV (although probably not too badly).

Won't that (Mac to TV airplay) beg for a new generation of :apple:TV. The current one has capped output at 720p (1280 x 720). There have been growing expectations of a new model now that Apple has finally embraced 1080p in the iPhone 4S. Are there any Mac's still limited to 1280 x 720 or less? Maybe this rumor- if true- is another sign a new 1080p-capable :apple:TV is on the way?
 
Maybe this rumor- if true- is another sign a new 1080p-capable :apple:TV is on the way?

I sure hope so. Honestly the 720P is fine but the rumors lately of an actual Apple television with the ATV stuff built in does not make sense to me. Why would Apple bother themselves with the display, audio, etc. components - commodities really - when they can put all the "intelligence" they need into a tiny box with an HDMI port? I really don't see a "value add" for an Apple television over an Apple TV box plugged into an existing television.
 
Then you're in the wrong place. As implied by its name, the purpose of MacRumors is to dig up that sort of thing, then speculate endlessly on it. :p

Is it a waste of time? Absolutely. Do I need to waste time sometimes, to help procrastinate things I'd rather not be doing? Absolutely.

Didn't you notice the "part jealousy" part? Jeez...
 
iMessage for Mac I'm not bothered about, but Airplay Mirroring is something I've been really waiting a looooong time for. Make it happen Apple!
 
Last edited:
Useful for presentations.

I'm going to be giving a presentation using iPhone 4S and AppleTV in a few week's time.
 
ATV2 has just started selling in our Apple online stores this weekend. Now this news. We are getting this really asap, I hate hooking up my DVI-HDMI cable every time I want to watch a movie.. what's more it kinda stutters when the camera pans....
 
. . .
They killed of Front Row, and this would have been the next logical evolution of the Front Row app.
. . .

Regarding Front Row:

Apple killing off Front Row, to me, seems a strategy aimed at unifying the Apple "full-screen media experience" via the Apple TV. With Front Row, you could just hook up your mac to your TV and use it to view your photos, videos, and listen to your music. The original Apple TV came out in parallel with Front Row (the two interfaces were nearly identical at first), with the philosophy that those people who wanted to watch their media on the big screen, but didn't want to manage a whole computer to do it, could use the ATV as their media center. You could store a certain amount of media on your original ATV via "synching", and have the ATV be your TV "computer".

With the release of the ATV2 last year, Apple seems to have changed their strategy. Now they have basically turned the ATV2 into a wireless TV adapter. It doesn't store ANY media long term in itself. It just streams media to your TV, either from the internet or your computer in your household. With that new strategy, in Apple's view, no will NEED to hook their computer up to their TV to enjoy their computer-stored media on the big screen. So killing front row serves to unify that vision/strategy, and simultaneously motivate mac-users to just go ahead and buy an ATV2.

Airplay mirroring of the mac screen would complete that vision: the ATV2 would be a wireless TV cable for your mac, eliminating the need for a "TV computer" (in Apple's view). Just my speculation.
 
iMessage is actually one of my favorite features of iOS 5 (I still have in iPhone 4 so i have not experienced Siri). The fact that my messages sync across my iPad and iPhone is awesome. Can't wait for it to sync with my MacBook Pro as well.

Great news! :)
 
What's interesting though is how this is what Google TV was cut off from doing. Networks wouldn't be able to tell you were mirroring in this fashion. If Apple redesigned the remote app to allow access your to Mac's screen, this would rock. They could even offer some of the functionality of Google TV in this way...

Google never really tried to work "with" the TV networks. Google tried to make it easy for the consumer to watch the TV shows that networks were willingly posting for free on their websites, using the consumer's TV. The TV networks know that anyone can do this themselves by plugging their computer into the TV directly with a video cable, but most people don't go to the trouble, so they never saw that as a major threat. But google TV made it "too easy", allowing you to do a search, have the internet version of that show pop up on the screen, and using your google TV remote to select, play, pause etc. The networks, nervous and cautious about protecting their advertising revenue by controlling their content distribution, weren't ready for that step. They wanted to be more in control of how and when their shows came to TV sets via the internet, and Google was doing it on its own terms. Hence, they got spooked and blocked Google TV.

Airplay mirroring from a mac would indeed do more-or-less the same thing Google TV tried to do, by letting consumers watch the free streaming version of TV shows on their big TVs without hooking up their computer via video cables. BUT it doesn't make it QUITE as easy as google tv made it. You can't (without jailbreaking) use your physical remote to select a website-based TV show and just press play. You would have to enable Airplay mirroring on your mac, then control your mac (not the Apple TV) to move the mouse, navigate the web, and play the show. One could argue that this is no different than using a video cable to connect your mac to the TV, it's just that the Apple TV basically BECOMES that video cable.

So the question is, how will the networks respond? I see two possible options: 1. they try to disable the functionality for streaming their shows, like Hulu+ has done with iPad mirroring. 2. They do nothing, and allow it.

The optimist in me is betting on #2. Since you could argue airplay mirroring from the mac is functionally no different than mirroring your mac screen over an HDMI cable, if the networks aren't threatened by people hooking up their computers to a TV, they shouldn't be threatened by people using Airplay mirroring in the same way.

Also, apparently this airplay-like functionality has existed for some time in the PC world (You always see those microsoft ads where people send the zombie movie they are watching on their laptop to their TV). What has the TV networks response to that been? (I actually don't know: do they ignore it or somehow disable their websites when mirroring is operating?)
 
I want AirPlay from my Mac now, to mirror my desktop to Apple TV for presentation.
 
I wonder if they will save these features for Mac OS X 10.8...:confused:

And make us wait another two years? I really hope not. It really can't be that difficult to do, especially if it can be done through an Apple ID from iPads and iPod touches. Then again I could be wrong, I'm not a software engineer for Apple...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.