In the audio industry, perfectly normal.Seven years between (meaningful) product updates is... something
In the audio industry, perfectly normal.Seven years between (meaningful) product updates is... something
You don’t need to replace them simply because a new version is out.High end headphones used to be a near 'buy it for life' purchase. Sad that we are willing to dump a $500 product after 5 years for one with another bell or whistle.
In the audio industry, perfectly normal.
It's not one their main, high-volumes products, so it doesn't need to only be pitched to their "main customers".not sure that's who Apple's main customers are
I like your "buy it for life" thought, DonutHands. As long as my AirPods Max keep working, they can be "for life" just like my AKG's and others. But I appreciate that Apple would continue to update the headphones because new buyers would then get the latest and best product to start with, as I did when I bought mine. Also, if someone wants to dump their old set on eBay and get an updated one, the refresh cost then is potentially much less than $500.High end headphones used to be a near 'buy it for life' purchase. Sad that we are willing to dump a $500 product after 5 years for one with another bell or whistle.
It's not one their main, high-volumes products, so it doesn't need to only be pitched to their "main customers".
More realistically, Apple is so big now that their "main customers" are whoever has the money to pay for the products and is prepared to give Apple that money.
Apple charge high prices, but they're not particularly elitist beyond that. It's a mistake to feel special or entitled because Apple will sell you things. They sell things to anyone.
Yes! This x100! 💯Just give me one thing. On/off button! My Max is with me all day, on my head, around my neck, in my bag. But I never take that weird case with me. So just give me some way to turn them off.
re: sound quality, lack of EQ discussion …
Exactly. There's no point quibbling about Apple's "main customers", as if there are requirements , other than having the money and desire to buy, to be a customer.It's a mistake to feel special or entitled because any company will sell you things. What company doesn't sell things to anyone with money?
What’s wrong with the current ones?
Exactly. There's no point quibbling about Apple's "main customers", as if there are requirements , other than having the money and desire to buy, to be a customer.
There is a strange attitude on here sometimes that it's a privilege to be an Apple customer. It's not. Buying Apple stuff doesn't make a person special.
My "Apple's main customers" point was that Apple's customers come from the tech world where they're used to seeing a constant stream of product updates and thus have expectation for that.
There are countless people that won't buy APMs simply because they are already seven years old and, in their minds, technology has gone forward by leaps and bounds, so it's unwise to buy something that old at full price.
Said another way, a company doesn't get to choose its customers, the customers choose the company - which is why every company need to some degree adhere to the expectations of their "main customers".
I wanted to buy these, but the lack of updates to even keep pace with the AirPods Pro made me too nervous. About a year and a half ago, I went with a pair of Bose. I'd rather have the Max, but Apple needs to take care of the product or it won't be popular enough not to discontinue.
Apple's AirPods Max have now been available for almost five years, so what do we know about the second-generation version?
![]()
According to Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, the new AirPods Max will be lighter than the current ones, but exactly how much is as yet known. The current AirPods Max weigh 0.85 pounds (386.2 grams), excluding the charging case, making it one of the heavier options in the premium over-ear headphones category. It is unclear what other changes they might have, beyond weighing less.
Both Bloomberg's Mark Gurman and Ming-Chi Kuo believe that new AirPods Max are on the way. Kuo expects the AirPods Max 2 to enter mass production at some point in 2027—seven years after the first-generation model launched.
In 2024, Apple updated the AirPods Max with a USB-C charging port and new color options, but they are still considered to be first-generation AirPods Max. The headphones did not receive Apple's H2 chip that debuted in the AirPods Pro 2 in 2022, so they continue to miss out on Adaptive Audio features, and there were no other changes. The AirPods Pro 3 have a range of features that could feasibly come to the next-generation AirPods Max, including:
- IP57 dust, sweat, and water resistance
- H2 chip
- 2.4GHz and 5GHz connectivity
- Lossless audio support with Apple Vision Pro
- "Siri" voice commands
- Adaptive Transparency
- Adaptive Audio
- Loud Sound Reduction
- Hearing Protection
- Hearing Test
- Hearing Aid
- Conversation Boost
- Conversation Awareness
- Live Translation
- U2 chip for Precision Finding
By 2027, the AirPods Pro could be even more advanced than the recently unveiled third-generation model, adding the "H3" chip and IR cameras. As a result, these features are also possibilities for the second-generation AirPods Max.
A refreshed design seems likely, especially given the rumored weight reduction and complaints from some users about the durability of the headband's mesh canopy. The Smart Case, which simply serves to put the headphones into their ultra-low power state, could also be due a redesign.
Gurman said that the long wait for a new model is due to the fact that the headphones are stuck in a kind of commercial limbo—"too popular for Apple to stop selling them, and not popular enough for the company to invest a ton of time and money into creating a new version." Apple's audio team is apparently more focused on annual updates for earbud AirPods and supporting audio components across other products.
Article Link: AirPods Max 2: Everything We Know So Far
It's a self-fulfilling cycle. They don't update them. I buy Bose instead when I wanted to buy the AirPods Max. Assuming others do the same, then Apple will see less reason to update them. Continue to improve them and they will become a more dominant product. Just look at how many people still buy them when they are 7 YEARS OLD! What would happen if they actually updated them every 3 years or so?I get that these must not be big sellers, thus there's little reason to regularly update them, but you would've thought that last year's "refresh" was an opportunity to actually upgrade the features and introduce a second generation model. These headphones are apparently important enough to keep around, but not important enough to meaningfully update in smaller than seven year intervals? I finally had a real reason to get over-ear Bluetooth headphones this year, and I opted for the Sonos Ace rather than the five-year-old AirPods Max. I'll consider the APM 2 in two years, I guess.
It's a self-fulfilling cycle. They don't update them. I buy Bose instead when I wanted to buy the AirPods Max. Assuming others do the same, then Apple will see less reason to update them. Continue to improve them and they will become a more dominant product. Just look at how many people still buy them when they are 7 YEARS OLD! What would happen if they actually updated them every 3 years or so?