I don't think this eurodouch cares about the price of the H95's.
If they weren't selling, they wouldn't sell them. B&O has always been, to me, the Saab of personal electronics.
View attachment 1694857
So, why is there still a review embargo for professional reviewers?
Agreed. What's taking so long? I'm pretty impressed with mine but that damn case might be the deal breaker. Its aweful.So, why is there still a review embargo for professional reviewers?
All I hear are people justifying spending $200-$300 more for headphones than they need to.
Yeah the price doesn't bother me as much as the case and weight.I’m so sick of the price shock.
High quality headphones can cost well over $550. It’s all going to be down to the sound. People that buy high end headphones will judge their worth.
Don’t just blame the buyer, those who made 500$ headphones before Apple, might have a great product but they didn’t market it, didn’t position it in a way that shows me, the customer, why they’re better.The major sticking point for me with regards those that have bought the $550 APM is why? These owners have headphones that are in the $200 - $300 price bracket thus having ignored the $500 - $600 range of headphones that are out there. So why take the leap now for a $550 pair from Apple?. There are already very very good $500 - $600 headphones that have been out in the marketplace for years and years way before Apple even thought of making a pair but yet when looking for a decent pair of headphones, they opted for a $200 - $300 pair of headphones, knowing $500 priced headphones were out there. Why not spend the $500 on an already existing pair of $500 headphones? or save up for a $500 pair of headphones?.
If these APM owners wanted to spend $500 - $600 on a pair of headphones, why has it taken for Apple to build a pair for them to spend that amount of money?
Let me know when you have something constructive to say about the headset, accept the fact you own them and you enjoy them, without being objective at all. Those are the reasons I don't like them. Use things in context, not just trying to justify them by any means. That's plain stupid.yeah. you are right. you are still confused if you are looking for one selling point. as has been detailed numerous times by others, there are a multiple selling points. It not just the clear sound, or not just the quality build, or not just the H1 chips ease of use in device switching and powering on and off, or not just the spatial audio, or not just the great ANC and transparency, it is the sum of all these. Perhaps you don't want all that in a headphone, perhaps you just want some base thumping your ears. That's cool. These aren't made for you. Apple knows their target audience and I suspect they hit it well. Time will tell.
But judging from the sheer number of posts you have on this topic, Apple has succeeded in catching your eye. When are you going to actually try them so you can give feedback from experience? You might then be less confused. Or, more sure these are not for you.![]()
Does a portable mouse get worse sound quality when it's bluetooth and cost $550 US?Is a Bluetooth mouse designed to be portable ?
I don't get the complaints about the weight. 🤔 My headphones weigh 450g, compared to 385g, and I sometimes wear them for hours and it's no problem at all.
You are likely in the minority - that will find a full pound of weight on your head to be pleasurable for extended periods.
Why would I disagree with that? I said the only thing that matters is ANC. So, uhh, clearly I would turn it on. But the MX4's ANC is not nearly good enough (and neither is Bose's) to make the sound on a plane a joy to listen to. It gets the job done to prevent boredom, but the resulting quality (pass-through noise included) is worse than the cheapest headphone in a quiet environment.Glad to know the ONLY thing that ranks in your books is ANC, but even the MX4 does a reasonable job of that so that listening to music, watching movies, on a plane is better with ANC on than off. Or do you disagree with that?
Waves hand. in the minority after 4 hours of actual use. shrugs.
All I hear are people justifying spending $200-$300 more for headphones than they need to. The improvements that people are citing are pretty much all niche. For the vast majority of consumers, the XM4s will make them happy.
no doubt XM4 sales will increase due to the AirPods Max announcement.
Let me know when you have something constructive to say about the headset, accept the fact you own them and you enjoy them, without being objective at all. Those are the reasons I don't like them. Use things in context, not just trying to justify them by any means. That's plain stupid.
" I'm just not sold on: weight, headband, polyester, crown control, no jack or cable included (yes sold separately, i know), no personal equalizer, no case, no option to turn them off, no charger, not sure if they have transparency mode?
I'm sold on: sound, magnetic cups.
So it's no only about the money. After the whole pros and cons I endup being sold only on one and a half thing compared to a dozen of cons. Will I buy it? No. Unless they change the cons to pros, I won't, even if it was $350, which is still not cheap by any means."