I guess unlike small AirPods this one is not so easy to be lost. Its size is easily detectable and when travel it should be in your traveling bag that's supposedly has AirTags in it.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
AirPods Max Don't Contain U1 Chip for Ultra Wideband
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
You would be surprised what can be lost. I tried reflective, photo-luminescent tape, Bluetooth tags, but my wife still loses her laptop somewhere in the house on a near daily basis.
Seeing as Apple is trying to saturate the market with devices containing U1 chips before they release the UWB tracking feature, this looks like an incredible oversight. Just one more reason to wait for Gen 2.
I don't think that's the case. AirPods Pro doesn't need U1 for spatial audio feature.
Spatial Audio (which the AirPods Max and AirPods Pro incorporate) is a different thing from spatial awareness (which is what the U1 chip supports).
A U1 chip would help you locate AirPods Max if you lost track of them, but that is about it.
More disappointed about the lack of wireless charging - I assumed we'd be going all-in on the magsafe charging route
U1 chip comes next year in the Airpods Pro Max at $149 extra.
Nope I'll never buy these, even at half the price because I don't listen to music
Talk about inconsistency! U1 chip aside, if you look at the female connection socket of Apple's other offerings this Fall:
1- New iPad Air: USB-C
2- iPhone 12: Lightning.
3- Beats Flex: USB-C
4- AirPods Max: Lightning.
Is it a coin toss for every product or something?
1- New iPad Air: USB-C
2- iPhone 12: Lightning.
3- Beats Flex: USB-C
4- AirPods Max: Lightning.
Is it a coin toss for every product or something?
I have to see these monstrosities in person. Is it just me or do Beats look better then these?
Lineup, c.2021
AirPods, $199
AirPods Pro, $249
AirPods Max $549, available in 5 colors.
AirPods Pro Max $999 with U1 and USB-C, available in Gold, Rose Gold, and Chrome.
AirPods, $199
AirPods Pro, $249
AirPods Max $549, available in 5 colors.
AirPods Pro Max $999 with U1 and USB-C, available in Gold, Rose Gold, and Chrome.
Maybe.
I think 2/4 may have more to do with keeping related products tight. This was probably tested and determined it would be worse for the consumer to have them different. Not me, I hate this garbage. But someone tested this and decided the complementary products required the same port.
1 was probably peripheral driven as they expanded iPad functionality.
3 may have been a nod to the non Apple ness of the product and the dissatisfaction non Apple users had with the proprietary port.
Apple intentionally withholds technology from version 1.0 of anything. The next iteration of their $500 headphones should have it.
AND YOU GET THAT CHIP EVEN IF YOU DON’T WANT IT!!!
I’m sure some will. The “gatherings of loud” here get loud for different reasons
The ones saying u can’t lose them aren’t necessarily the same ones that will throw a party. Though some WILL most definitely throw a party, that’s a different GoL. There’s a thread here that indicates... “it’s done been bought!”
because then they’d have to charge $850. $500 for headphones is the sweet spot for most people during COVID
Not really, no. The U1 chip is for devices to determine where they are in relation to each other via wireless signals. How far is your iPhone from mine, are they pointed at each other, etc. The spatial audio feature is all about where your head is (and thus the headphones) in space. It doesn’t really matter if you’re juggling your phone while you’re listening to music, or if it’s in your pocket or on the table. The headphones really just care if your head it tilted in relation of the ground or not (which isn’t transmitting ****).
The headphones probably just use gyros and accelerometers like everything else. No fancy wireless chip required.
I actually like this better than my Beats Studio 3 if I'm being honest.
If U1 was all about finding lost things then I don’t know why my HomePod minis have U1 chips. I’m not transporting them anywhere.
I too thought this U1 thing was an all in from Apple, but not putting that chip in these headphones throws my assumptions out the window.
(I’m through guessing with Apple, just give me my M-series iMac sometime in 2021 please.)
I too thought this U1 thing was an all in from Apple, but not putting that chip in these headphones throws my assumptions out the window.
(I’m through guessing with Apple, just give me my M-series iMac sometime in 2021 please.)
And if you misplace your iPhone and/or keychain with an attached AirTag how do you suppose they'll be located by another Apple device on your account if that device doesn't have an ultra-wide band chip in it?
HomePod mini is always on, and a home hub device. This one is not. (It's on when you wear it).
This can do 44.1 16bit! Why can't these headphones do that ?
Apple's new AirPods Max headphones are not equipped with a U1 chip for Ultra Wideband, according to Apple's tech specs, and confirmed by MacRumors. (This chip is not to be confused with the H1 audio chip in each of the AirPod Max's ear cups.)
First introduced in iPhone 11 models last year, the U1 chip enables improved spatial awareness. The distance between two devices that support Ultra Wideband can be measured precisely by calculating the time that it takes for a radio wave to pass between them, with much more accuracy than Bluetooth LE and Wi-Fi.
Apple's rollout of the U1 chip has been inconsistent, with all iPhone 11 and iPhone 12 models, Apple Watch Series 6 models, and the HomePod mini equipped with the chip, but not the second-generation iPhone SE, Apple Watch SE, or the latest iPad, iPad Air, and iPad Pro models. Apple has also yet to release a Mac with Ultra Wideband support.
Apple's use of Ultra Wideband technology has been limited so far, such as a directional AirDrop feature in iOS 13 and later, but the company has promised more exciting use cases in the future. One of those use cases will likely be its long-rumored AirTags items trackers, which analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has previously said will support Ultra Wideband, which should allow users to locate their lost items with greater accuracy.
Multiple leakers had suggested the AirPods Max (which were dubbed AirPods Studio in rumors) would be equipped with the U1 chip, including Jon Prosser.
Article Link: AirPods Max Don't Contain U1 Chip for Ultra Wideband
