Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
365 days later we are still trying to find the use-case for a $549 Bluetooth Headphone that you can't create content on.
content you create on others devices...you cant create music with headphones (or just with headphones)
 
I love my AirPods Max Headphones. Listening to an album on them is like a luxurious event. I listened to Jon Coltrane's Love Supreme in spatial audio before and it was a top notch listening experience. Their sound and the way they flawlessly connect instantly between my Apple devices puts them as my favorite headphones over my SONYS.
 
content you create on others devices...you cant create music with headphones (or just with headphones)
My point was that these have tremendous latency/lag issues while using them for anything besides content consumption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: colinwil
I returned them. Amazing ANC and ambient sound mode but super heavy and wasn’t feeling the sound quality.
 
I love my AirPods Max Headphones. Listening to an album on them is like a luxurious event. I listened to Jon Coltrane's Love Supreme in spatial audio before and it was a top notch listening experience. Their sound and the way they flawlessly connect instantly between my Apple devices puts them as my favorite headphones over my SONYS.
Bluetooth just isn't good enough for a 'top notch' listening experience yet. It's great for what it was intended for - Wireless headphones while traveling, and you don't mind the compression. However, there is no way in hell i'd use BT headphones while sitting at home when even a cheap pair of HD-6XX's and a $25 USB DAC will perform better.
 
Last edited:
I like the AirPods Max a lot. Great sound and battery life. I use them a lot for conference calls, since I work from home most of the time. The only downside is that I think a couple of cm shorter from the weight.
 
I own a pair of Airpods Max headphones. I like them. But they have glaring design flaws. First, the bluetooth codec the headphones support lack sufficient bandwith for lossless standard resolution audio. Second, the headphones lack a digital input that can transmit either lossless or high resolution audio.

Here are features I'd like to see in the next generation Airpods Max heapdhones (assuming the product isn't killed off like the original HomePods):

1. Support for improved bluetooth codecs like AptX HD, AptX Lossless and LDAC. Of course, this would also require that Apple support these codecs on their iPhones, iPads and Macs. Good luck with that.

2. An ultra low power wi fi chip. This would be a real game changer. Why even bother with bluetooth if the headphones can receive digital audio via wi fi? More than sufficient bandwidth for lossless audio, and possibly for hi res audio.

3. A USB-C digital input. This would probably be the best way to listen to hi res audio. Simply connect the headphones to a USB-C output on an iPad or Mac (and hopefully an iPhone once Apple comes to its senses and scraps the lightning connector.

4. A real case. Sorry, but the bra just doesn't cut it.
 
Bluetooth just isn't good enough for a 'top notch' listening experience yet. It's great for what it was intended for - Wireless headphones while traveling, and you don't mind the compression. However, there is no way in hell i'd use BT headphones while sitting at home when even a cheap pair of HD-6XX's and a $25 USB DAC will perform better.
What I hate is you can have either spatial audio with these or lossless audio with HD-6XX's and a $25 USB DAC, you can't get both features on one pair of headphones.
 
I own a pair of Airpods Max headphones. I like them. But they have glaring design flaws. First, the bluetooth codec the headphones support lack sufficient bandwith for lossless standard resolution audio. Second, the headphones lack a digital input that can transmit either lossless or high resolution audio.

Here are features I'd like to see in the next generation Airpods Max heapdhones (assuming the product isn't killed off like the original HomePods):

1. Support for improved bluetooth codecs like AptX HD, AptX Lossless and LDAC. Of course, this would also require that Apple support these codecs on their iPhones, iPads and Macs. Good luck with that.

2. An ultra low power wi fi chip. This would be a real game changer. Why even bother with bluetooth if the headphones can receive digital audio via wi fi? More than sufficient bandwidth for lossless audio, and possibly for hi res audio.

3. A USB-C digital input. This would probably be the best way to listen to hi res audio. Simply connect the headphones to a USB-C output on an iPad or Mac (and hopefully an iPhone once Apple comes to its senses and scraps the lightning connector.
I've been saying the same thing for a while now. What I hate, too, is that Macs, iPhones, iPads, and headphones don't have 24-bit/192K DACs builtin. We have to get external DACs that support it. I know it takes a while to design the appropriate hardware, but same could be said of getting Apple Music ready to support hi-def audio. Is it really that hard for the Apple Music guys to send an email to the hardware engineers "Hey, we're going to implement 24-bit/192K music, make sure we have the hardware to support it!"
 
I could swallow the price point on these things if they offered wireless lossless support. However, without that, they are just such overpriced garbage. For half the cost the Sony's, Bose, etc. all perform on par, if not better. Further, these are not portable at all. At least with the other brands they fold into something smaller and easier to pack into your travel bag.

The only game changer Apple could provide here is true wireless lossless support with iOS devices by offer a direct link via WIFI or something.
Gotta disagree with you. I think they are superior. And I picked mine up used but in mint condition for 380. Totally worth it for office work where other employees can be distracting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dogg
What I hate is you can have either spatial audio with these or lossless audio with HD-6XX's and a $25 USB DAC, you can't get both features on one pair of headphones.
That's the most insane part about these things to me. Like, OK, BT doesn't do lossless - Got it. However, why in ****'s name couldn't we at least get full 24-bit/192khz lossless via lightning cable straight from my iOS device to the Airpods Max? It's idiotic. Given the cost of these things there is no reason they couldn't have put a 24-bit/192khz capable DAC inside the Airpods Max to accept the digital stream over cable from iOS.
 
A lighting to lighting cable would be a nice one year anniversary product to further enhance the Max experience.
 
If I bought a pair, I would be afraid to wear them outside the house they're so expensive..
 
Gave me a headache due to the clamping force on Day 1. Returned them and haven't found anything similar ever since. Almost bought a Bang & Olufsen pair of headphones afterwards for gaming but due to connectivity issues I passed on those as well.

Airpod Max's have promise but they need to be adjustable for big heads like myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
HomePod doesn't have great bass. You need a subwoofer and HomePod doesn't have it...maybe barely because when I had a HomePod (I returned it) bass was weak. AirPods Max have good bass sounds and you're not annoying people around you with the boom-boom-boom from a subwoofer.
Who am I annoying when I'm at home alone? Real speakers are always going to provide better sound than headphones.

If I really want big sound I can turn on my stereo and let the 200w 10" sub shake the place. In general daily music listening, I don't want that while working.
 
When you've got people saying they've never even used other ANC cans before.. It's all you need to know.

I'm glad these people are happy, but it's mind-numbing how people will just buy it apparently without doing any level of cross-comparison or they do, and decide they'll just bend over and let Apple have the $200 premium.

With how bulky these things are, I also wonder how many people are just using these in a home/desktop environment where they'd be far better served with other $550 offerings on the market that don't need to attempt to be portable.

I was able to get mine a few weeks back with a decent discount and I wanted a comfortable pair of over-ears that meshed seamlessly with the rest of my Apple ecosystem. For those points alone, the headphones are great.

If you want other things out of them or own PC's/Android devices, maybe they aren't for you.
 
Still one of the most underwhelming products apple has released in recent history. Why you would go with these over the latest offerings from Bose or Sony boggles the mind...
If people having slightly different preferences in products "boggles" your mind, well, I don't know what to tell you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theyearof84
Five things Apple could do to fix the problem of the Airpods Max:
1. Halve the price
2. Make then fold so more portable.
3. Halve the price
4. Provide a real case
5. Halve the price.

1. Sure
2. Absolutely not - folding only introduces parts that can bend more easily and eventually break (ex: Beats Studios)
3. Sure
4. Sure
5. Sure
 
  • Like
Reactions: jprmercado
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.